  
      
      
        
     
  | 
    TRIMILLENNIUM
      MANAGEMENT : LEADERSHIP 
      Leading through
      NuancesBy L.
      Zappei, with J. O'Toole & N. Bahadur 
      Why do some
      companies continue to succeed when they have no inherent advantages? Why
      is it that most industries have a handful of champions and many also-rans?
      Clearly, these organisations have an intangible yet crucial attribute
      accounting for their consistent long-term success. This is leadership.
      Leadership is the energy which provides vision, strategy, and objectives
      to a group, whether a small company or a nation. 
      Leadership has often been closely aligned
      with vision and direction. A major challenge of leadership is to
      identify-or create-common ground where diverse interests of followers can
      be made to overlap. The freedom fighters led by Mahatma Gandhi envisioned
      independence from the British as a unifying factor for the diverse Indian
      populace. 
      The leaders of the Ford Motor Co. in the
      1980s saw that a concern for quality could bridge the differences between
      union and management, staff and line, marketing and finance, and
      engineering and operations. Leaders often do not create a vision
      themselves, but invariably initiate a process for developing it and
      generating buy-in. Their tasks include selecting a leadership team,
      creating a shared vision through listening and identifying the needs of
      followers, building a case for change, and linking it to their needs. 
      Successful leaders instill a sense of
      self-confidence in followers. Communication of the organisation's vision,
      goals, and principles is the adhesive that binds a leader's efforts.
      Robert Goizueta, Coca Cola's leader, had a flair for communicating the
      essence of a complex idea in a simple phrase: ''Each of the 6 billion
      people on Earth drinks, on an average, 64 ounces of fluids daily, of which
      only 2 ounces are Coca-Cola.'' 
      Establishing the appropriate behavioural and
      reward structure is a critical task for leaders. It is important for
      leaders to focus on the essentials, define the levels of empowerment,
      reward learning, and innovation. Most systems of evaluating performance
      are still output-oriented and number-driven which encourage unintended
      competition. At ABB, the performance measurement system, abacus (the C
      stands for communication and not control), evaluates criteria such as
      generosity, co-operation, innovation, and flexibility apart from numbers.
      In addition, leaders focus on performance through reframing business
      challenges, linking metrics to accomplishment, creating a sense of
      urgency, and energising the organisation. 
      It has often been argued that the tenets of
      leadership would differ depending on regional culture, customs, and
      environment. And that there is a distinct US, Indian, or Chinese style of
      leadership. Undoubtedly, business practices, customs, and consumer needs
      would differ depending on the region of operations. However, key
      leadership characteristics tend to be the same. IKEA's furniture and its
      concepts of space management vary widely in the 29 countries where its 142
      stores are present; but its philosophy, values, and unique style is the
      same. Its management principles of openness, egalitarianism, informality,
      consensus-based decision-making, learning by doing, and sharing
      information at all levels transcend national boundaries. 
      Finally, most leaders align their
      organisations by creating appropriate structures and inculcating the
      process of adaptability throughout the organisation. In the 1970s and
      1980s, technology change was a key driver in the rapid growth of new
      markets as well as excess capacities, slowdown in growth, and increasing
      cost competition in traditional markets. 
      The key strategic issues of raising capital,
      achieving economies of scale, dealing with product and market diversity,
      and the competitive position were primarily managed by concentrating on
      the processes of planning, resource allocation, and monitoring and
      control. The 1990s witnessed different competitive dynamics in the form of
      the globalisation of competition, market- and technology-led customer
      focus, accelerating technological changes that extended boundaries,
      increased need for speed and flexibility, and cutting-edge infotech. The
      liberalisation of the Indian economy in the 1990s witnessed a significant
      change in the challenges facing Indian businesses. 
      Where, once, the major test of corporate
      leaders was in managing the government and the bureaucracy, today's
      leadership challenges are concentrated on competitive dynamics, domestic
      as well as global. Business restructuring, focus on core competencies, and
      business process re-design are, thus, the key tasks forced on the Indian
      businesses. The key to creating leadership advantage is through developing
      a structure which allows for the continuous self renewal of leaders across
      the organisation. 
      The successful development
      of leadership capabilities requires a transformation on 3
      dimensions-content, processes, and people-in an integrated fashion.The
      content focuses on objective-driven change that draws on the vision of the
      organisation to create implementable programmes of change. This dimension
      underlines institutionalisation of system and behavioral modifications to
      build the capability of continual response to shifting conditions. The
      process deals with successful management of change initiatives. Key
      capabilities for programme management include leadership and relationship
      management, initiative detailing, alignment of resources, integration and
      monitoring of programmes, and communication and education of insights. 
      The people path is the cascading of change
      from the CEO down to the first level of the organisation. This is
      developed through a combination of sponsors who articulate and ideate
      leadership changes, agents who implement the initiatives, and targets who
      participate and learn the new requirements. In summary, Lao-tzu understood
      leadership 2,600 years ago: 
      A leader is best, 
      When people barely know he exists, 
      Not so good when people obey and acclaim him, 
      Worst when they despise him. 
      ''Fail to honour people, 
      They fail to honour you.'' 
      But, of a good leader, who talks little, 
      When his work is done, his aim fulfilled, 
      They will all say, ''We did this ourselves.'' 
      L. Zappei is the
      Managing Partner (India) and N. Bahadur is an Associate at Booz-Allen
      & Hamilton (India), and J. O' Toole is a Professor at the University
      of California  
       
      |