TRIMILLENNIUM
MANAGEMENT: PEOPLE
Break all the New
Rules By Anita Ramachandran
Events of
the last 5 years of the previous century have focussed our attention on
knowledge industries. In the first few decades of the New Millennium,
India will witness a proliferation of brainpower- and manpower-intensive
industries. The way we manage people in this millennium must take into
account the contours of these industries and the expectations of a young,
highly intelligent, and ambitious workforce that can choose to work
anywhere in the world.
But it isn't just the hi-tech sector that
will force us to change the way we manage people in this millennium. The
21st Century will witness a boom in retailing and the emergence of new
industries focused on providing a service or an experience rather than a
product. These industries will change the skills that we demand of our
workforce and bring new types of people into the workforce.
The organisation of the future will have an
increasing number of part-time employees as well as a number of employees
doing multiple jobs. As we become sharper in our definition of the skills
we seek, it becomes possible to outsource and seek more expertise.
Besides, with technology helping accelerate processes, service businesses
will be able to offer jobs for a few hours at a time. Thus, the
organisation of the future could well have employees who are hired
part-time to work on a specific activity, and are not overly concerned
with the organisation's vision, mission, or belief in teams.
With the need to be globally competitive on
costs, services and quality, both companies and employees will want more
flexibility: for instance, the option of coming to work for a few hours 3
days a week. As entire activities get outsourced, companies could hire
small teams of up to 10 people rather than individuals. The leader of the
team will have to be an entrepreneur who takes on the responsibility of
hiring employees, training them and delivering work of acceptable levels.
Even today, most companies think of employees
as those with a total commitment to a single organisation. They think of
work as all consuming for an employee and expect him to have the
commitment to put in hours well in excess of his contracted terms. And
they compensate him in various ways for this. Today, companies do this
through different models of compensation that include a mix of cash,
perquisites, and stock or variable pay, or by providing facilities such as
childcare, fitness centres, or a mechanism to take care of chores like the
payment of electricity and telephone bills. But will the employee of the
future seek as much involvement on the part of the employer? And will
companies want to be as benevolent?
Computers and technology have already changed
the definition of the workplace. Employees no longer need to be physically
present in the office. In fact, they don't even have to belong to the same
organisation. The New Millennium will witness an increase in the number of
these bit employees. It will also see the emergence of a few system
integrators who coordinate the employees, align their efforts to the
mission of the company and achieve whatever they set out to do. Companies
will become smaller and essentially be a network of a number of small
teams and individuals. Will vision, mission, company ties, and company
bonding have any relevance in such a scenario? What will be the glue that
will make these constituents interested in the whole picture? And do they
need to be concerned at all?
I see a future where individuals may want to
work on jobs requiring 2 different skills in 2 different places: for
example, being a computer programmer and a music teacher. One may meet the
employee's need for compensation; the other, her need for self-actualisation.
Indian employees will, indeed, have the freedom to make these choices in
the New Millennium because their compensation, adjusted for purchasing
power parity, will, over a period of time, be comparable to
global-benchmarks for most high- skill jobs.
The 21st Century could also see more
employees being entrepreneurs and employees at the same time. As the
number of double-income households keep increasing, the risk-taking
ability of the average employee will increase. So will the ability of the
employee to spend on their own training and learning. In a partnership
structure, it will no longer be the company's responsibility to train the
employee; the latter needs to come to work fully loaded.
Compensation will become more sharply aligned
to the risk-reward potential of a job as it already is in other parts of
the world. It will become more individual-oriented and will be a function
of the time-commitment, results sought, and the risk involved. And the
typical contract will not exceed 2 or 3 years. An employee's productive
lifecycle in the 21st Century will become much shorter. Consequently,
employees will have to focus on maximising earnings in a shorter timespan
like our sportsmen and filmstars! The employee's compensation-cycle will
be a series of 'S' curves, which will reach higher or lower peaks-higher
or lower earnings than in the past-depending on her competency. The series
of compensation-curves of employees who manage to keep ahead of the
learning curve will have two or three high points. But in the case of
those unable to do so, the compensation-curve will be a sharply inverted
'V.'
Will this century see
us being different in our hr practices from the rest of the world?
Clearly, we can't live in isolation as we did in the past. Answers to a
few critical questions will guide our hr policies in this century: will
India continue to have a large number of educated unemployed? Will the
lifestyle and leisure expectations of employees change? And will barriers
to mobility across countries continue to remain?
But for the large majority who do not have
the opportunity to be mobile, there may still remain a culture that will
be common to all low-cost nations: a culture with a focus on productivity
and efficiency. The economic realities of being globally competitive will
force attitudinal changes related to performance, quality orientation, and
cost consciousness. In a market-driven economy there will be no scope for
automatic wage-hikes linked to inflation; nor will jobs be protected. hr
policies in the future are bound to reflect this reality. But some of our
Indian ethos and emotional bonding with the workplace and relationships
will endure all this. The intrinsic Indian need for an anchor, which comes
both from families and the belief that work is worship will, hopefully
remain.
Anita Ramachandran is
the CEO of Cerebrus
|