|
STRATEGY
Lakmé Restages Its Opera
Its turnaround sketch has got just a few
strokes - grab the fashion platform, spruce up the supply-chain, and test
the rural waters.
By Shamni
Pande
High
priestess of sacred Indian temple meets English army officer who's
unwittingly strayed into holy ground. They fall in love. Her orthodox
father vows vengeance... That's the story of Lakmé, a 19th century opera
written by Frenchman Leo Delibes, from which Simone Tata borrowed the name
Lakmé (French for Lakshmi, the name of the priestess).
By 1999, the world looked set for a revised
version of the work. Simone Tata was no longer on the scene. And a
home-grown fashion brand-often personified as the high priestess of
fashion in the country-had been sold to a multinational company whose
provenance was English, well, Anglo-Dutch, actually-Hindustan Lever Ltd (HLL).
Worse, with HLL not appearing too keen
about the brand-the company, predictably, denies this-Lakmé, the brand
looked all set to follow the spirit of Lakmé the opera (a tragedy).
Lever was right. The aria, as is now
evident, wasn't quite over. Standing amidst the jamboree of what is,
arguably, India's first fashion summit, the Lakmé India Fashion Week (LIFW
for short), Anil Chopra, 51, the affable Director who heads Lakmé Lever
Ltd is bullish about the brand's new positioning: ''By taking on the
fashion and glamour platform, we have, in a way, not just taken a lead
(over others), but also got a virtual ownership of this plank. It will be
very difficult for any other brand to adopt a similar approach.'' And
reactions to the born-again Lakmé at the LIFW did suggest that Chopra and
the brand were on to a good thing. ''Lakmé is at the forefront of
product-innovation. Almost everyone has a Lakmé-something in their
(cosmetics) collection,'' gushes Mumbai-based fashion choreographer Lubna
Adams. So, is Lakmé back?
Getting the focus right
A little bit of Lakmé history: in 1995,
Lakmé Ltd (a Tata Group company) and HLL formed a 50:50 venture Lakmé
Lever that would market and distribute Lakmé's products. In 1998, Lakmé
sold its brands (and the 50 per cent it owned in the JV) to HLL, renamed
itself Trent and entered a different business (retail). Only, the years
between 1995 and 2000 saw HLL wrestling with several issues with a bearing
on Lakmé's future.
The FAQs: With Ponds becoming part of HLL,
what happens to Lakmé's skincare business? What does Lever's launch of
Aviance mean for Lakmé? And why is it so difficult to find Lakmé
products?
Chopra accepts that distribution has been
the company's Achilles heel for some time: ''The supply-chain hasn't been
as robust as it should have been, but that has been the result of our
efforts to reposition and reintroduce the brand.'' The positioning bit,
although complex, is clear: Ponds is Lever's primary skincare brand;
Lakmé, its aspirational colour cosmetics brand, which also has a presence
in skincare.
The 'aspirational' qualification would mean
Lakmé would compete at what the company terms the 'upper-mass' (premium)
end of the colour cosmetics spectrum (products priced between Rs 85 and Rs
250) where a slew of competitors, ranging from Revlon (through Modi
Revlon) to Chambor, are already slugging it out. Says Meghna Modi, 26,
Executive Director, Modi Revlon: ''The numbers say it all. According to
ORG-MARG's retail audit, we have an 84 per cent share of the premium end
of the colour cosmetics market.'' Chopra is quick to rubbish this claim;
he says ORG-MARG does not have a representative sample of the 60,000
outlets through which colour cosmetics are sold in India.
Still, it is conceivable that Lakmé's
new-found aspirational strategy could have been brought about by
competitors like Revlon and Maybelline, which targeted this segment.
Indeed, the company's non-transfer lip-colour range follows in the wake of
Maybelline's launch of a similar range, and its new nail-enamel colours
come soon after Maybelline and Revlon launched their nail-enamel range.
The company's defence is that it takes at least 15 months from the
conceptualisation to the actual launch of products.
And fashion consultants like Meher
Castelino believe the brand commands an edge at the high-end: ''By
appropriating the fashion platform for itself, Lakmé has entrenched
itself at the glamour-end.''
Getting the spread right
The premium segment, however, is just a
slice of the Indian market for colour cosmetics (estimated size: Rs 275
crore). Today, the company has three brands: Lakmé itself, which will be
positioned as a fashion-brand; Elle 18, which has enjoyed success as a
college-girl brand; and Orchid, a super-premium brand that hasn't really
seen much excitement since its 1999-relaunch.
The company plans to re-re-launch Orchid by
end-2000, and is test-marketing Elka, a brand targeted at the lowest-end
of the colour cosmetics market. The brand, Chopra claims, could also
catalyse Lakmé's entry into the hinterland, but only if tests show there
is a rural market for colour cosmetics. Says Nikhil Vora, 28, Portfolio
Advisor, Sharekhan.com: ''Though rural markets are big potential, a
company has to think of segments carefully. Any expansion into new areas
should be justified by returns.''
Lakmé will remain a loner in the Lever
stable: Unilever does not have a presence in the colour cosmetics segment.
That means Lakmé Lever will have to depend on its own kitchen garden. But
a focused-most of its skincare business and all of its exports business
have been taken on by HLL-Lakmé does seem to be on a come-back trail.
It's still the second act, but this opera could well have a happy ending.
|