|
HEALTHCARE
The Next Big
Thing?
It's a jigsaw that has puzzled
corporates for years. Now, thanks to a new organised-retail type business
model the business of healthcare may well end up being the next big thing.
By Suveen
K. Sinha
''Healthcare is the next big thing''
Anon.
Circa 1982
''There's a revolution waiting to happen
in healthcare''
Anon.
Circa 1988
''After IT, it is going to be the turn
of healthcare''
Anon.
Circa 1994
''Healthcare is the next big thing''
Anon.
Circa 2000
These
declarations can be attributed to just about anybody: chief executives,
analysts, consultants, even futurists at large. If healthcare is still
everyone's bridesmaid-of-choice, not a happily married mother-of-three,
there must be reason for it. Not that there have been no efforts in the
organised, or corporate, healthcare space. In 1984, Prathap C. Reddy set
up the first of what's now become the five-hospital Apollo chain; the
Escorts group followed suit with the Escorts Heart Institute in 1988; and
pharmaceutical company Wockhardt did its bit by opening a hospital in
Bangalore in 1989, and another in Calcutta last year.
Still, these remained the destination
stores of the healthcare domain. The supermarkets, a corporate presence in
neighbourhood clinics, and the real harbingers of the rev, were (and are)
nowhere to be seen. Worse, there's some sort of vile-pursuit-of-Mammon
stigma attached to the business of healthcare. ''It's not a business,''
emphasises Naresh Trehan, the medic who heads Escorts Hearts Institute.
Unravelling
the jargon |
Primary
care: Health maintenance clinics providing
preventive care. Typically, they have a doctor/nurse/trained worker
and are equipped to check temperature, blood pressure, sugar level,
and ECG |
Secondary
care: Diagnostic clinics. These have CT scan, MRI,
and X-ray facilities |
Tertiary
care: Large super speciality hospitals that boast
of world class equipment and an army of doctors conducting
complicated surgery |
So, healthcare remained a bridesmaid, and
companies seeking diversification opportunities that promised higher
returns than the market, opted for infotech. And the numbers have stayed
abysmal: India, a country of a billion people, spends just $17 billion a
year on healthcare; the US does $1.2 trillion. India has a hospital bed
for every 1,300 people; first world countries have one for every 250; and
the World Health Organisation recommends that each country have at least
one for every 700. Oh, and lest we forget, 70 per cent of the US-spend on
healthcare comes from the private sector.
Still, dismissing claims that healthcare
could be the next big thing could prove presumptuous: two companies which
coincidentally share some sort of blood-link, are approaching the business
from its supermarket end (or 'bottom-up' as the CEO of one of the
companies insists on calling it), an approach that has also been
discovered by a born-again vet of the business. The first is Analjit
Singh's Max India that will build, by 2005, a network of between 35 and 40
primary care clinics, four diagnostic centres (with ambulatory surgery
facilities), two medium-sized hospitals, and a large state-of-the-art
tertiary care hospital.
The second is Fortis Healthcare, in which
Analjit Singh's nephews Shivinder and Malvinder (sons of Ranbaxy's late
Parvinder Singh) own an 84-per cent stake. In April this year, the hub of
their unique business model, the Rs 155-crore Fortis Heart Institute at
Mohali near Chandigarh, will start operations. Then, by end-2002, the
spokes-diagnostic centres and health maintenance clinics in Amritsar,
Jalandhar, Ludhiana, Shimla, Jammu, and Ambala-will be in place.
Plans
and more plans.. |
Apollo
Present: Five
super-speciality hospitals; another one under construction in
Colombo
Future: Similar hospitals in Mumbai, Colombo,
Muscat, Dhaka, Dodoma, Accra, and Riyadh; 200 Apollo Lifestyle
Clinics to come up across the country and will provide primary care
BT's view: A pioneer, it is
reinventing itself to tap the primary care market |
Escorts
Present: Escorts
Hearts Institute in New Delhi
Future: Will remain confined to
super-speciality care; the Delhi hospital to be replicated in Jaipur
and Amritsar
BT's view: Has identified
heartcare as its strength and wants to retain their focus; doesn't
think of healthcare as mere business |
Wockhardt
Present: Hospitals
in Bangalore and Calcutta
Future: Two new super-speciality hospitals in
Mumbai and Bangalore
BT's view: Will remain confined to tertiary
care |
Max
Healthcare
Future: A
focus on Delhi alone for the next four years, the model envisages a
branded network comprising 35-40 primary care clinics, four
diagnostic centres with ambulatory surgery, two medium-size
hospitals, and one state-of-the-art large tertiary care
hospital
BT's view: Looking to cast its
net wide |
Fortis
Healthcare
Future: Fortis Heart
Institute in Mohali to commence operation in April this year; an
array of diagnostic centres and health maintenance clinics being set
up across north India
BT's view: Similar to Max, but goes much
beyond Delhi |
Reliance
Present: Harkishen Das Hospital, Mumbai
Future: Not talking of healthcare as a
business
BT's view: With the Ambanis, you can never
tell |
Marico
Industries
Future:
Has set up a separate healthcare division; believed to be interested
in a setting up a chain similar to Max's and Fortis'
BT's view: Early days |
The
Delhi Government Future:
Plans to set up some 30 hospitals in the capital
BT's view: God knows |
And Apollo, which is extending its
destination-store concept of speciality hospitals to more locations within
and without the country-Mumbai, Colombo, Dhaka, Muscat, Dodoma, Accra, and
Riyadh-has tweaked its business model to create Apollo Lifestyle Clinics,
200 of which will open their doors for business by end-2002. The economic
logic behind these ventures is straightforward: address the educated
middle-class that may prefer the benefits offered by an 'organised'
corporate clinic as opposed to a neighbourhood general practitioner; and
continue to tap overseas markets to fill up the capacity in the speciality
hospitals. Says Narayan Seshadri, Head (Business Consulting), Arthur
Andersen: Some of our doctors are really good but continue to practise in
hospitals one may not like to visit. They will perform better in an
organised and efficient system. If the doctors can be given a value
proposition, it will make a great difference.''
One thing that sets the two new ventures
apart is the language of numbers their CEOs speak. ''This isn't about
philanthropy,'' says Vinay Singhal, the CEO of Fortis who's had stints at
HLL and JK Synthetics before this. ''A healthcare business must be run on
a commercial basis if it has to grow.'' Adds Max Healthcare CEO Nripjit
Singh 'Noni' Chawla: ''Ours is a business-for-profit.''
And one benefit they will almost certainly
offer is better service. If a Dubai-based NRI wishes to undergo heart
surgery at its hospital-costs in India are one-tenth those in Western
Europe and the US-Fortis arranges everything from the ticketing onwards.
''We have to acquire a customer-orientation. That's how the
hospital-phobia will go away,'' chuckles Singhal. Adds Chawla: ''The
central point of our module is customer focus. We are training doctors,
nurses and technicians in that aspect.'' Indeed, Fortis has a single-line
brief for its six-man hr team screening applicants: all recruits must have
a mindset to serve.
Getting The Biz To Work
It's not as if past efforts at organised
healthcare haven't paid off. Apollo closed 2000 with revenues of Rs 278.9
crore and a net profit of Rs 27.83 crore. But the business is a
capital-sink. A 200-bed hospital could set a company back by as much as Rs
70 crore. For those interested in specifics, Max will invest Rs 400 crore
over the next four years in its network. An MRI (Magnetic Resonance
Imaging) machine, for instance, could cost as much as Rs 10 crore. A
hospital can conduct a maximum of 10 MRI scans a day, with each earning
between Rs 5,000 and Rs 7,000. A basic number-crunching exercise indicates
that it will take 10 years to just recover the cost of the machine. Then
there are the costs associated with staffing the hospital, and running it
24 x 7. ''There is no way a hospital (of our scale) can be profitable in
the first five-to-seven years,'' says Trehan.
Lobbying for tax-breaks is one way out.
Reddy's wishlist includes ''granting an infrastructure status to
healthcare, and the reduction of duty on equipment''. Another way out is
to leverage a business model that captures customers at the primary-care
level through a vast array of neighbourhood clinics, and channels the flow
of patients upwards if the need for specialised care arises. Says Seshadri:
''Given our population, the volumes will come from preventive or primary
care that will also channel the flow of patients into secondary and
tertiary care. Secondly, in the long run, the money may come more from
preventive care since an improvement in its quality will reduce the number
of patients needing tertiary care even as the number of beds goes up in
super speciality hospitals. And insurers insist on preventive care.''
It is on the basis of this economic
principle that Max's Chawla expects the Dr Max Network (that's what it is
called) to start generating profits in three years; and Fortis' Singhal,
the hub-and-spoke one, in mid-2004. And the sector could benefit when the
private healthcare insurance business takes off. ''This,'' avers Reddy,
''should greatly enhance people's ability to pay for high-quality
healthcare.'' There is more that it could achieve: like midwifing the
emergence of the concept of Health Maintenance Organisations-firms that
offer a managed care health plan that provides healthcare in return for a
fixed payment from individuals or employers. While the US-experience with
HMOs has been a patchy one-type HMO into any search-query and you are
likely to end up on webpages rubbishing them-there's one thing that they
will prevent: unnecessary tests, medication, even surgery that many
believe form the other side of organised healthcare.
|