INTERVIEW WITH RAY STATA 
      "India Will Be The IT Design House Of The World"
      In the year that his company touched $1
      billion in sales, Ray Stata stepped down as the CEO. Five
      years on, Stata continues to be the chairman of the board of Analog
      Devices, Inc. (ADI), the Massachusetts-based semiconductor company he
      founded in 1965 with partner Matt Lorber. Now 67 years old, Stata-born
      into a family of farmers-has lost none of his zeal for new technology or
      venture funding. Although Stata's association with India is almost 20
      years old, it was only recently that he committed serious money to the
      region by setting up a new design company, acquiring Hyderabad-based Chip
      Logic, and investing $10 million from his own pocket in Ventureast TeNet
      Fund, set up by Ashok Jhunjhunwala, professor of telecommunications at IIT-Madras.
      In Chennai recently, Stata spent more than an hour with BT's Nitya
      Varadarajan to talk about his management philosophy,
      and where he sees India's strength in it could be. Excerpts: 
       Q. It's been five years since you gave up
      active involvement in ADI. Now you are sought after as a venture
      capitalist. How do you like this change in role? 
      A. I was always a venture capitalist.
      When Analog Devices was started, the concept of VC funding was unknown.
      Borrowings were from banks, and there was a compulsion for generating
      returns both for growth and repayment. Analog Devices had to make profits
      from the first year, and it did. In that sense of internal funding, I was
      a VC. Now, of course, I do more hands-on investments. One investment I
      made, which was purely personally motivated and not with a financial end
      in view, was with the TeNet companies of Ashok Jhunjhunwala. But other
      investments are not socially motivated like this one; they have been made
      with the material end in mind. 
      Your links with India go far back... 
      Yes, Analog Devices has had a relationship
      with India for the last 20 years, selling components in a modest scale. My
      first trip to India was in the mid-1990s (when I met Jhunjhunwala) and our
      associations with Indian companies for digital signal processing
      applications (at least 15 of them) intensified. Then, last year we bought
      out Chip Logic, which is our only acquisition in India. That apart, I have
      personally invested in Ventureast TeNet Fund. 
      This is a question that every foreign
      investor is asked: do you have significant investments in other key
      markets? 
      We do have investments, but in a more modest
      scale, in China, Australia, and some in Europe. But our focus by far is in
      India. 
      What would you essentially look for in a
      company that you fund? 
      I am not a numbers' guy, so I don't foresee
      future profits immediately. But I would look at the technology the company
      is offering, how innovative and relevant IT is. If the company does not
      have an entirely new product then how does IT plan to value-add to bring
      out competitive alternatives. I would also look at the quality of
      people... the technical talent. Then I would assess the people: are they
      assertive or are they participative. I dislike authoritarian minds. 
      Where do you think India stands globally
      in IT? 
      I foresee that India will be the design house
      of the world. Not in manufacturing, but definitely in design. However, a
      few important measures have to be taken. Indian engineers would have to
      stay on in the country, work from here, bring in success stories, and
      highlight sustainable models. 
      Remember that the US has engineers who have
      the experience of several years behind them. Indian engineers would also
      have to 'accumulate' their experience. But the TeNet model of Prof.
      Jhunjhunwala is doing precisely this, and there are other companies
      too-although not as many as one would wish. It may take a decade, but
      since the country has world-class engineers, it is achievable. 
      Is it that faith which prompted you to set
      up Integrated SoftTech Solutions here? 
      Yes. iSoftech will be an R&D outsourcing
      company, which will develop, implement, maintain products at the behest of
      companies. 
      It has already started working on several
      important projects related to networking (intelligent core optical network
      equipment) and embedded products, e-mail client software, and telecom
      provisioning software, which enables users select services they want on
      the web. Currently, the company has a team of 15, and will grow to 100 in
      a year-and-a-half. The break-even should come in the second or the third
      year. There are many small American enterprises wanting to source design
      from India, but don't know where to go. The iSoftech experiment will help
      break barriers between both countries, and link smaller enterprises
      together. 
      Talking of engineers staying back, Prof.
      Jhunjhunwala is trying to do precisely that, and also create technology
      relevant to the Indian market. 
      Prof. Jhunjhunwala is an absolutely
      remarkable man. He has a singular vision of developing affordable products
      that can be used by the masses, for popularising IT at the ground level,
      and for linking industry and university together. Jhunjhunwala is the
      greatest of leaders, a great salesman, strategist and a technologist. 
      Is there any model that Indian IT
      companies could follow to become more relevant globally? 
      The IIT model (as practiced by Jhunjhunwala's
      TeNet group) would be invaluable for showcasing purposes. The brightest
      people have to stay here, have to learn total quality management (TQM)
      through 'mutual learning'-that is, learn collectively through groups of
      affiliates. Even competitors should come together and learn to do well in
      management. 
      Analog Devices has inspired a lot of
      management practices, including the balanced scorecard. How did a
      technology company get to be so good at management? 
      In the early 80s, Jay Forrester (founder of
      Digital Computer Lab at MIT) put together a group for the new management
      staff project, which focussed on management culture, the making of
      successful employers, and management from a systemic point of view. I was
      part of this group of six to eight CEOs that met three to four times a
      year. We discussed many common elements that made for success. Peter Senge
      was a research assistant for this project, and I can say that our
      discussions formed the genesis of his book (The Fifth Discipline). 
      And the balanced scorecard? 
      It was (Art) Schneiderman (a consultant) and
      I who worked together in finding a tool that would elevate the matrix of
      quality. The Crosby School advocated the 'do it yourself mode' and 'read
      books', but this did not work. Then I hired Schneiderman who already came
      with a 'learning curve' concept, which helped to reduce waste
      exponentially in a given period of time. Quality measures were added to
      this, and we had what is known today as the balanced scorecard. Later
      presentations were given to universities, and it caught on in a big way. 
      Although Analog Devices had a much slower
      growth than, say, Intel, it was always considered a great company to work
      for. How did you manage to create that reputation? 
      Analog Devices has more than 10,000 people
      today. The reason why it has grown so much is the underlying principle of
      having respect for people and providing them a framework and suitable
      environment to work in. A lot of people working in hi-tech areas while not
      being entrepreneurs in their own right nevertheless like freedom from
      authoritarian type of management. They need the space to be creative and
      we offer that. 
      You went to a small school in a rural
      community. What gave rise to your interest in technology? 
      In school, there were small courses in
      science, but I read much more on science and mathematics. This, in turn,
      fuelled me to expand the knowledge frontier further. My first turning
      point in that direction came after I slammed my head into a wall while
      playing basketball and ended up in hospital. There another patient, an old
      gentleman, after listening to me talk, advised me to head for MIT. ''Set
      you sights to MIT, don't go anywhere else,'' he said and that became my
      singular ambition. 
      From the village school you went to the
      Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). What did you gain from the
      MIT experience? 
      Many things. Even getting into IT was an
      experience. I had a four-year completely pre-paid naval scholarship that
      any university would accept-except MIT. Funds were a constraint, but get
      in I did, and worked my way upwards. Apart from learning to be persistent,
      I learnt a lot about relationship building and managing. I was clever, but
      there were people a lot smarter than me. The workload was very high and
      challenging. It was so strenuous that nothing could have been worse-and
      this really prepared me for anything that could happen in the future. 
      Given your years of experience right at
      the top, what do you think is essential for an organisation to grow and
      succeed? 
      A willingness to change, adapt and integrate.
      Analog itself started with a single product line, shifted to functional
      circuits, then we shifted from simple parts to integrated circuits,
      subsequently from signal processing to digital processing. Now we also
      offer complete design solutions, solutions to handsets, and GSM solutions.
      As Ross Ackoff, a management guru said, ''Performance depends on how parts
      work together than separately.'' Most work only in perfecting parts. Of
      course, leadership style is also important. 
      How is the tech slowdown impacting the
      semi-conductor industry? 
      The answer lies between hope and speculation.
      I think the worst is over. Historically, it has taken about a year for the
      industry to recover from previous bad spells, but this time I think IT
      will take 18 months to two years to get into its previous footing. 
      Looking back, what do you have to say
      about the life that you have led? 
      I have satisfied all my material needs. Now I
      am in the value curve of innovation and creativity, which motivates and
      which is, in turn, the path to self-actualisation. It is important to
      remember that the learning of the individual and the corporation is
      linked. 
      |