|
CU 2Nite@McLuhan's...
The decision
by Delhi's largest cellular services company to launch a youth club-for
its subscribers of a certain age profile-shouldn't, in normal course of
events, be fodder enough for even a passing mention in a space
traditionally reserved for rarefied pontification. If it does, it is
because there is more to the happening: it is probably the first attempt
by an Indian cellular service provider (or tech company) in lifestyle
marketing. Abstruse as it may sound (and inadvertent as the initiative may
be), that is the truth.
A cellular service, like most other
technology-linked services, is at the end of the day, a commodity
offering. There is only so much a service provider can differentiate
itself on the basis of price, value-added offerings, service quality, or
technology. To get subscribers to continue to pay the premium they do for
the service-and it is, despite falling tariffs, still a premium-companies
have to adopt a lifestyle platform. And that is exactly what the company
in question seems to have done.
Are Indian cellular users ready for such a
shift? Purely going by their itchy-fingers when it comes to SMS, one would
think so. The numbers may be insignificant in comparison, but the SMS
revolution in India is no less a watershed than comparable events in
Finland (where cellular phone penetration is the highest, in excess of 80
per cent, and where teenagers in the streets were playing a SMS-based cops
and robbers game three, may be four years ago), and Japan.
The benefits of moving to a lifestyle
platform can be enumerated in agonising theoretical fashion, but the case
is probably easier to present through the experiences of the world's three
strongest technology lifestyle brands. The first is Apple, and from the
first Macintosh, to the iMac, to the Cube (which didn't do well), to the
iBook, to the iPod, the company that resides at 1, Infinity Loop,
Cupertino, has set itself apart as the world's premier technology
lifestyle brand. It may no longer be possible to get all the software you
want for a Mac, and the company may have, courtesy some early erroneous
decisions, been relegated to the status of niche player, but as a brand,
Apple still retains its lustre. There are enough Mac-fanatics in India to
bear this out.
The second is the only company that is today
in a position to challenge Apple (purely for the label of tech-lifestyle
numero uno), Finn cell-phone maker Nokia. When you are selling as
commoditised a product as a cellular phone, technology (no matter what you
call it) or features don't matter. Which is why Nokia has steadfastly
refused to label itself a technology company. Its CEO Jorma Olilla has
always maintained that Nokia is a consumer products company. You can't get
any more lifestyle-oriented than that. Philips presents an ideal contrast.
The company has tried to leverage its undisputed technology leadership
status into a great consumer brand and not enjoyed as much success as it
could have. Ever heard of someone wanting to own a Philips mobile?
And the third is Japan's docomo, a movement
more than a brand which has managed to create a community of a couple of
tens of millions, merely by putting some dumb devices in the hands of
people, tying in some nifty utilities, and then nurturing a community.
To take a little detour, creating a
lifestyle-platform was what community sites tried to do, in India, and
elsewhere in the world. And their failure, at least in India, can be
attributed to the fact that there wasn't a critical mass of users to
create a community. With mobile phones there is. The service provider that
has launched the youth club boasts just over a million subscribers across
the country.
Talk of technical specifications and service
quality may appeal to informed end-users, like purchase managers of
companies. Retail consumers can't be bothered much about it-whether it be
computers, or cellular phones, or a cellular service. A computer is a
computer is a computer, except when it is Apple. A mobile phone is a
mobile phone is a mobile phone, unless it is a Nokia.
|