Dr Y.V. Reddy, deputy Governor,
RBI, speaks to BT's
Roshni Jayakar on the challenges facing the banking sector.
Excerpts:
|
Banks, whether private or public, will
have to compete and be efficient
|
Q. It is ten years since the start of fiscal
reforms and the liberalisation of the financial sector. Where does
the sector stand today?
A. You have rightly combined fiscal reforms
and the liberalisation of the financial sector because both are
closely linked. While the end to automatic monetisation of the government
deficit is the most crucial step in fiscal reforms, there is still
a long way to go in terms of fiscal consolidation. There is a need
for not only reduction in revenue deficit but also enhancement of
quality of fiscal adjustment through fiscal empowerment.
As far as the financial sector is concerned,
its progress has been significant alhough further acceleration is
possible only once fiscal reforms pick up.
What would be our major achievements? The
external sector, for instance, seems a winner...
Yes, it's a sure winner. The achievement is
particularly impressive because the international experience as
well as intellectual opinion on exchange rate management has recently
moved dramatically in favour of our policy package.
Actually, we withstood domestic uncertainties
and external shocks; in addition we have strengthened the capabilities
to meet exigencies, with a build-up of forex reserves and the flexibility
in the management of monetary policy and financial markets.
Overall, the tasks ahead in fiscal and financial
sectors are essentially structural in nature and the milestones
have been identified by the ten advisory groups set up in the context
of international standards and transparency codes.
The Indian banking and financial sector
survived the crisis of 1991, the securities scandal of 1992, the
Mexican tequila effect, the Asian contagion, the non-banking companies
scandal, the Pokhran effect, and the bubble of 2000. However it
still seems vulnerable in terms of its long term survival-particularly
the profitability challenge that it faces and the huge problem of
non performing assets.
I do not agree that it is more vulnerable now.
There is greater sensitivity and consciousness about what has to
be done. The resilience in the banking sector is mainly because
a number of recommendations of the two Narasimham committees have
been implemented. What remain are essentially structural reforms.
The problem of NPAs exists but it is inappropriate
to put the responsibility solely on the banking sector in as much
as the overall credit recovery system and credit culture are still
to be improved.
Given the precarious state of some public
sector banks would you say the role apportioned to the banking sector
through its nationalisation in 1969 is still relevant. Is the public
vs private debate still relevant?
I agree with you about the precarious state
but it is not of some but only of one or at the most two or three
of the public sector banks and a few private sector banks too. Whether
it is public or private sector, there will be some banks that are
not strong and some that are strong. The critical issue is of really
improving the overall efficiency of the banking system.
Banks are banks and they have to compete. They
have to be efficient and regulated properly irrespective of their
being public-or private-owned.
In terms of monetary policy, the RBI has
moved towards a softer interest rate regime. This conflicts with
the huge borrowing programme of the government. And the fact is
that this hasn't quite triggered a rise in credit offtake. Could
we then say that the monetary authority's role in triggering growth
is now limited?
In a particular context, a softer interest rate
regime may be alright but the general thrust of the monetary policy
is towards appropriate interest rate. According to the monetary
policy statement, there are rigidities in the interest rate regime
in India. The financial markets are not well-developed. The financial
institutions themselves are in a state of transition. The impact
of the monetary policy should be viewed in this background, and
in any case the credit offtake and the overall output are functions
of several factors. Monetary policy in India, we believe, is playing
an enabling role.
|