Indian
industry has seen many changes since we attained independence in
1947. At the time of independence there were a few large organisations
that controlled Indian industry. Most of them were family-run enterprises,
but there were also others, who could be looked upon as public limited
companies in the private sector.
With the advent of independence, there was
a great surge towards public services and the first two decades
saw the emergence of many heavy industries in the public sector,
the ''temples of modern India'' as Jawaharlal Nehru termed them.
It was unfortunate that whilst developing the public sector, the
growth of the private sector was stymied. With the advantage of
hindsight, one can now judge that the growth of our organisations
in India would have been enhanced if both the sectors were encouraged
to grow concurrently, and thus provide competition and stimulation
to each other.
In the early days it was felt that the main
objective of the corporate sector was to provide employment and
social services to the population. This was an extremely socialistic
point of view. The private sector was looked upon as politically
unacceptable because the wealth generated by it was supposedly for
the benefit of the private parties who owned the industry. The concept
of generation of wealth in general, and of profit in particular
was not considered important. It took a long time for the Indian
organisation to realise that whereas we need not follow the narrow
capitalist concept of pursuing profit only, the ''generation of
wealth'' is essential for all good things that flow out the organisation.
The concept of 'trusteeship', which was enunciated
by Jamsetji Tata and his successors, had finally found acceptance
in our country. The wealth generated by the Tata Enterprises has
not been used for private consumption, but has been put to good
use in the development of the society.
Many other organisations in India have realised
the importance of the concept of trusteeship and are now actively
pursuing good corporate governance as well as supporting institutions
for the further development of the country. As a result, all the
stakeholders; the employees, the suppliers, the customers, have
benefited along with the government. And of course, the shareholders
(owners) also.
The shareholders are the true owners of an
industrial enterprise, and they will park their monies with those
companies whom they can trust. The sharemarket will hold managements
accountable and will punish those in whom their trust has been misplaced.
The private sector must work in the public interest.
Corporate objectives now include benefits to
the community in which the organisation is located. It is very well
appreciated that the enterprise cannot thrive if it stands out as
a pillar of prosperity in a sea of poverty. In line with this policy,
the vision of Tata Steel, for example, covers the benefits that
would accrue to society in general and to the employees in particular,
along with delighting the customer and ensuring a healthy system
of wealth generation. It also ensures that in this fast-changing
world, it is essential to remain in front with path-breaking activities.
The past, however glorious it has been, should
not be taken as an insurance for the future. In the current scenario,
where information technology has made redundant yesterday's leaders,
it is most essential to keep on changing. Those organisations that
have refused to, or could not be changed, have perished in the quagmire
of 'status quo'. Organisations of tomorrow will need to be more
fleet-footed, flexible, and seek out opportunities to grow rapidly
as never before. In such an environment, it would be essential for
the employees and their managements to secure for themselves the
early-bird advantages of daring to dream and developing the high
skills required for successful entrepreneurship. It is no longer
an environment where the employees and the management look upon
themselves as adversaries. Rather they should form a team, and the
government, acting as the third party in the 'triumvirate', should
lead Indian industry to the successes it is quite capable of achieving.
|