Scorecard : Close Ended Debt Funds
UR=Univarsal Rank
CR=Category Rank
RR=Risk Rank
|
Scheme Name
|
Mutual Fund
|
Date
|
Performance
|
NAV
|
Fund Size
|
Fund Manager
|
Rank
|
Investment Pattern
|
||||||
|
Incept.
|
Redmpt.
|
3 Mths
|
1 Yr
|
Since Incept.
|
30-Sep
|
UR
|
CR
|
RR
|
EQ
|
Debt
|
||||
|
Close Ended
Debt Funds
|
||||||||||||||
|
Chola Amity
|
Cholamandalam Cazenove MF.
|
Mar-99
|
Mar-04
|
3.93
|
16.85
|
14.94
|
12.69
|
|
D Ravishankar
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
na
|
na
|
|
Chola HI 99
|
Cholamandalam Cazenove MF.
|
Mar-99
|
May-04
|
3.14
|
14.51
|
13.00
|
12.47
|
|
V.P.Chaturvedi
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
na
|
na
|
|
Escorts Income Bond
|
Escorts Mutual Fund
|
Oct-96
|
Oct-01
|
-1.44
|
10.83
|
13.51
|
16.43
|
13.2
|
K K Mittal
|
22
|
2
|
Low
|
0
|
100
|
|
GIC Suraksha 96
|
GIC Mutual Fund
|
Mar-96
|
Mar-06
|
0.93
|
-2.94
|
9.12
|
14.2
|
47.9
|
P N Akolkar
|
50
|
6
|
Low
|
na
|
na
|
|
LIC Dhanavarsha (8)
|
L.I C Mutual Fund
|
Aug-96
|
Oct-01
|
3.49
|
11.76
|
18.31
|
17.48
|
819.5
|
Manish Chordia
|
31
|
3
|
Low
|
0.33
|
99.7
|
|
PNB RIPS 90 RO++
|
PNB Mutual Fund
|
Aug-90
|
Sep-01
|
-2.78
|
3.20
|
-13.00
|
83.91
|
14.6
|
D S Arora
|
46
|
5
|
Avg.
|
na
|
na
|
|
PNB RIPS 94
|
PNB Mutual Fund
|
Sep-94
|
Sep-02
|
-7.23
|
-2.88
|
-2.12
|
8.19
|
68.8
|
D S Arora
|
41
|
4
|
High
|
na
|
na
|
|
SBI MMIS 98 (II)
|
SBI Mutual Fund
|
Oct-99
|
na
|
-0.23
|
12.94
|
16.79
|
12.92
|
209.3
|
|
17
|
1
|
Avg.
|
na
|
na
|
|
UTI MIP 2000 (Third)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Oct-00
|
Oct-05
|
na
|
na
|
na
|
na
|
|
V Ramanan
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
na
|
na
|
|
LIC Dhanavarsha (10)
|
L.I C Mutual Fund
|
Jul-97
|
Sep-02
|
2.81
|
11.25
|
26.02
|
14.64
|
37.8
|
V Ramanan
|
32
|
7
|
Low
|
3.22
|
96.8
|
|
LIC Dhanavarsha (11)
|
L.I C Mutual Fund
|
Jan-98
|
Mar-03
|
1.85
|
14.46
|
21.42
|
13.77
|
22.6
|
V Ramanan
|
28
|
6
|
Low
|
1.56
|
98.4
|
|
LIC Dhanavarsha (12)
|
L.I C Mutual Fund
|
Jun-98
|
Jun-03
|
0.69
|
9.71
|
17.86
|
13.11
|
128.4
|
V Ramanan
|
35
|
9
|
Low
|
2.46
|
97.5
|
|
LIC Dhanavarsha (13)
|
L.I C Mutual Fund
|
Oct-98
|
Oct-03
|
2.75
|
11.41
|
17.69
|
13.08
|
145.9
|
Nagendra Singh
|
23
|
4
|
Low
|
3.58
|
96.4
|
|
LIC Dhanavarsha (6)
|
L.I C Mutual Fund
|
Sep-95
|
Oct-01
|
-2.14
|
-1.84
|
5.49
|
9.62
|
25.5
|
Nagendra Singh
|
49
|
15
|
Low
|
7.84
|
92.2
|
|
LIC Dhanavarsha (7)
|
L.I C Mutual Fund
|
Jan-96
|
Apr-02
|
0.93
|
15.66
|
15.32
|
17.28
|
18.8
|
R M Tanaikar
|
26
|
5
|
Low
|
8.17
|
91.8
|
|
LIC Dhanavarsha (9)
|
L.I C Mutual Fund
|
Oct-96
|
Jan-02
|
1.79
|
6.54
|
16.46
|
16.45
|
66.0
|
R M Tanaikar
|
39
|
11
|
Low
|
6.86
|
93.1
|
|
SBI MMIS 97
|
SBI Mutual Fund
|
Apr-97
|
Jun-03
|
-2.12
|
8.91
|
9.53
|
10.15
|
47.2
|
K Muhund
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
6.87
|
93.1
|
|
SBI MMIS 98 (I)
|
SBI Mutual Fund
|
Feb-98
|
Mar-03
|
-0.67
|
15.05
|
17.31
|
14.91
|
135.0
|
Mihir Vora
|
21
|
3
|
High
|
9.07
|
90.9
|
|
SBI MRIS 93
|
SBI Mutual Fund
|
Feb-93
|
Dec-00
|
-1.24
|
16.13
|
5.78
|
14.38
|
92.0
|
Mihir Vora
|
20
|
2
|
Avg.
|
33
|
67
|
|
UTI IISFUS 97 II
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Jan-98
|
Jan-03
|
-15.38
|
-10.21
|
0.01
|
9.85
|
665.6
|
Parijat Agarwal
|
44
|
14
|
High
|
33.5
|
66.5
|
|
UTI DIP 91 - Capital Growth
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Oct-96
|
Oct-01
|
-2.58
|
3.93
|
19.76
|
17.74
|
278.8
|
Veena Rathi
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
53.6
|
46.4
|
|
UTI GCGIP 94
|
Unit Trust of India
|
May-94
|
Jun-04
|
-4.30
|
-0.28
|
0.71
|
10.45
|
211.4
|
Manish Bhatia
|
40
|
12
|
High
|
44.6
|
55.4
|
|
UTI IISFUS 95
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Sep-95
|
Sep-00
|
-5.39
|
-8.31
|
7.10
|
10.7
|
60.9
|
|
52
|
16
|
Avg.
|
46
|
54
|
|
UTI IISFUS 96
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Dec-96
|
Dec-01
|
-8.64
|
8.72
|
12.33
|
11.21
|
179.0
|
Parijat Agarwal
|
33
|
8
|
Avg.
|
19.5
|
80.5
|
|
UTI IISFUS 97
|
Unit Trust of India
|
May-97
|
Jun-02
|
-17.37
|
-7.45
|
13.32
|
9.94
|
738.9
|
Parijat Agarwal
|
43
|
13
|
High
|
47.7
|
52.3
|
|
UTI IISFUS 98
|
Unit Trust of India
|
May-98
|
May-03
|
-3.25
|
-7.34
|
34.37
|
10.22
|
1036.4
|
Parijat Agarwal
|
18
|
1
|
Avg.
|
38.2
|
61.9
|
|
UTI IISFUS 98(II)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Dec-98
|
Dec-03
|
-13.99
|
-4.13
|
3.10
|
10.45
|
1074.3
|
Parijat Agarwal
|
38
|
10
|
High
|
37.8
|
62.2
|
|
UTI MIP 2000
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Jun-00
|
Jun-05
|
|
|
-2.40
|
9.28
|
1104.2
|
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
53.3
|
46.7
|
|
UTI MIP 95 (III)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Dec-95
|
Dec-00
|
1.10
|
7.83
|
18.80
|
20.25
|
609.1
|
K. Roychaudhary
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
37.2
|
62.8
|
|
UTI MIP 95
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Jun-95
|
Jun-02
|
0.83
|
14.37
|
17.08
|
19.33
|
644.1
|
K. Roychaudhary
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
29.5
|
70.5
|
|
UTI MIP 96 (II)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Jun-96
|
Jun-01
|
0.10
|
14.88
|
19.85
|
19.45
|
415.0
|
Anagha Hannurkar
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
31.9
|
68.1
|
|
UTI MIP 96 (III)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Sep-96
|
Sep-01
|
-2.37
|
12.58
|
16.11
|
17.31
|
407.2
|
A V S Ramanujan
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
18.7
|
81.3
|
|
UTI MIP 96 (IV)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Dec-96
|
Dec-01
|
-1.70
|
12.57
|
15.87
|
16.19
|
877.6
|
A V S Ramanujan
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
43.5
|
56.5
|
|
UTI MIP 96
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Apr-96
|
Apr-01
|
-3.49
|
13.90
|
17.10
|
19.09
|
239.0
|
Anagha Hannurkar
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
39.2
|
60.8
|
|
UTI MIP 97 (II)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Jun-97
|
Jun-02
|
2.72
|
3.22
|
1.97
|
10.59
|
1707.1
|
K. Roychaudhary
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
49.7
|
50.3
|
|
UTI MIP 97 (III)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Aug-97
|
Aug-02
|
-0.95
|
-3.24
|
1.74
|
10.46
|
894.4
|
K. Roychaudhary
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
31.6
|
68.4
|
|
UTI MIP 97 (IV)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Oct-97
|
Oct-02
|
4.39
|
1.61
|
2.91
|
10.7
|
1000.4
|
Ajay Argal
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
47.2
|
52.8
|
|
UTI MIP 97 (V)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Dec-97
|
Dec-02
|
-1.72
|
-6.62
|
1.31
|
10.3
|
496.0
|
Sandeep Shirsat
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
44.6
|
55.4
|
|
UTI MIP 97
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Apr-97
|
Apr-02
|
1.18
|
-0.83
|
0.84
|
10.27
|
1214.0
|
Ashish Ranawade
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
39.5
|
60.5
|
|
UTI MIP 98 (II)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Jun-98
|
Jun-03
|
-2.14
|
-10.35
|
0.24
|
10.05
|
868.7
|
Ajay Argal
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
24.7
|
75.4
|
|
UTI MIP 98 (III)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Aug-98
|
Aug-03
|
-6.54
|
-11.82
|
1.07
|
10.15
|
1193.2
|
K. Roychaudhary
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
65.3
|
34.7
|
|
UTI MIP 98 (V)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Jan-99
|
Aug-04
|
-2.36
|
-3.54
|
2.72
|
10.34
|
850.4
|
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
33.8
|
66.3
|
|
UTI MIP 98
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Mar-98
|
Mar-03
|
-2.29
|
-6.98
|
1.70
|
10.26
|
981.9
|
Vinay Agarwal
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
42.5
|
57.5
|
|
UTI MIP 99 II
|
Unit Trust of India
|
July-99
|
Jun-04
|
0.00
|
|
2.80
|
10.28
|
1176.2
|
Ajay Argal
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
51
|
49
|
|
UTI MIP 98 (IV)
|
Unit Trust of India
|
Nov-98
|
Nov-03
|
-2.36
|
-6.60
|
6.36
|
10.76
|
848.9
|
Ajay Argal
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
36.3
|
63.7
|
|
UTI MIP 99
|
Unit Trust of India
|
May-99
|
May-04
|
-2.90
|
|
7.10
|
10.71
|
2758.9
|
Ajay Argal
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
39.2
|
60.8
|
|
UTI NRI Fund
|
Unit Trust of India
|
May-99
|
Nov-03
|
-3.51
|
-7.60
|
2.47
|
10.46
|
64.9
|
Ashish Ranawade
|
#
|
#
|
#
|
38.4
|
61.6
|
|
Mutual Funds Scorecard,
lists major schemes offered by various Asset Management Companies in India.
However, for the purpose of risk rating and performance ranking, only
the schemes with life of more than one year have been considered. # denotes
funds included in scorecard but with life of less than one year or non
availability of regular NAVs. Various options under a scheme have been
ignored as portfolios are same and compounded performance works out to
be similar. Performance ranking have been done considering growth options.
NAV data and returns are shown as on 29.09.00/ 30.09.00. Fund Size, Asset
Break Up and Entry-Exit Load are based on the latest reported figures
by the AMCs but not earlier than 30.06.2000. Classification of funds:
Fund schemes have been classified on the basis of their last disclosed
portfolios rather then going by the name or stated nature of fund; Returns
: 3 months - Absolute gain/loss (%) in the scheme's NAV in last 3 months;
1 year - Percentage gain/loss in the scheme's NAV in last one year; since
inception - annualised compounded gain/loss in the scheme's NAV in since
its inception; * Balanced Funds ranked among equity due to heavy equity
exposure; ++ Face Value Rs. 100/-; + Face Value Rs. 1000/-; $ Equity funds
having more than 60 % exposure in ICE (Information, Communication & Entertainment)
stocks; $$ Equity Funds having ICE exposure between 40 % to 60 %.; $$$
Equity Funds with less than 40 % exposure in ICEstocks. UR - Universal
rank, i.e. rank within broad category of Equity, Balanced and Debt Funds.
CR - Category rank, i.e. rank within the same type of funds on the basis
of portfolio composition/ objective
|
||||||||||||||