RESTRUCTURING
Battered, But On The Mend
A mountain of bad loans and shrinking
profits have put IFCI in a tight spot . To survive, it needs to
restructure ownership-fast.
By
Suveen K.Sinha
At the Industrial Finance Corporation
of India's (IFCI) headquarters in Delhi, the story goes that none of its
chairmen has ever seen the inside of ICRA-a credit rating agency in which
IFCI holds 26 per cent equity. Apparently, the Chinese Wall ensures the
independent functioning of ICRA.
But now times are such that IFCI's current
Chairman and Managing Director, P.V. Narasimham, 58, may be forgiven if he
gives in to the temptation of breaking the age-honoured rule. The
provocation? ICRA has just downgraded IFCI's long-and medium-term ratings
from LAA+ and MAA+ to LAA- and MAA-, respectively. That makes it the
second downgrade in the last 13 months. Earlier, IFCI's bonds were
downgraded from AAA to AA+. Says P.K. Choudhury, 53, Managing Director,
ICRA: ''There is great pressure on the yields of IFCI due to competitive
reasons.''
Choudhury's is an understatement. Things are
downright alarming at the 52-year-old, one-time financial powerhouse, the
oldest development financial institution, and till date the only one in
North India. Its non-performing assets (NPAs) are mounting, burning a hole
in its bottomline, and forcing it to make higher provision for bad debt.
There has been a drop in interest spreads due to low yields and
historically high cost of funds. As a result, IFCI's reserves are drying
up. It has a capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 8.8 per cent, making it the
first public financial institution to report a car below the Reserve Bank
of India's stipulated 9 per cent. So, the big question is whether IFCI can
survive in its present form.
A Matter of Faith
Sitting in his tennis court-sized 18th-floor
office in New Delhi's glistening IFCI Towers, Narasimham gives the
impression of a man on the move. Deeply religious, he seems keen to clean
up the dirt that was swept under the carpet all these years. IFCI's
critics say that it is teetering on the edge. But Narasimham-who was
brought in two years ago for the no-nonsense reputation he acquired during
his stint with the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI)-says it is
far from true. He asserts: ''As I see it, things will only get better and
better.''
At the moment, it sounds more like a matter
of faith than fact. IFCI's balance-sheet paints a grim picture. At 20.8
per cent of Rs 20,000 -crore assets for the last fiscal, IFCI's NPA-levels
are alarmingly high. Sure, the current figure is a marginal improvement
over 1998-99's 21.4 per cent. But it is still higher than IDBI's 13.5 per
cent and ICICI's 11.5 per cent. ''They need to improve the quality of
their clients,'' says an executive of a rival financial institution.
The Downward Spiral
Part of IFCI's NPA problem is historical. In
the early 1990s, the institution raised funds at relatively high rates of
interest. Within a few years of doing so, a benign monetary policy pushed
interest rates down by as much as 200 basis points. While IFCI had to lend
at the lower market rates, its cost of funds had already been fixed at the
higher end.
What made matters worse was the fact that
IFCI lent primarily to capital-intensive projects, and particularly to
those in cement, steel, textiles, and chemical industries. The
quasi-recession of the late 90s sent most of its projects into a spiral of
cost- and time-overruns. Those that managed to go on-stream were plagued
with problems of low capacity utilisation. In fact, the power sector-where
IFCI had some of its biggest borrowers-is still struggling to sort out
regulatory issues.
Says Mukul Gupta, 36, a financial services
expert with Andersen Consulting: ''IFCI needs to tap the retail market to
hedge risks and source funds cheaper.''
Besides, it needs to move towards universal
banking by getting into areas like insurance and asset-management to
diversify its sources of income, stabilise its earning, and improve
corporate image. Here it could take a leaf out of ICICI's book. The FI has
been focusing on automobile loans, home loans, and consumer loans.
Taking It Head On
Narasimham is cracking the whip on NPAs. Last
year, IFCI made a one-time settlement in as many as 160 cases, raking in
Rs 432 crore. The year before it had netted Rs 600 crore. By the end of
this financial year, he intends to lower the NPA-level to 15 per
cent-about Rs 3,000 crore at current levels. Simultaneously, he is
restructuring the debt of borrowers to help them repay. In the last two
fiscals, debt worth Rs 668 crore has been reorganised by adjusting their
repayment schedules.
Where the incumbent management of borrower
firms proves inept, IFCI is seeking the ouster of senior managers. And
those units beyond help could be put on the block, with the proceeds
helping other ailing units of the borrower.
IFCI is restructuring some of its own debt
too. In 1999-2000, it retired Rs 800 crore high-cost debt and borrowed Rs
3,170 crore at an average cost of 12.3 per cent. It also issued new
preference shares worth Rs 20 crore for a tenure of two years, bearing an
interest rate of 10.5 per cent. Besides, it has drawn up a comprehensive
list of don'ts (See IFCI's 7 New commandments).
Narasimham's list of challenges doesn't end
there, though. He has to perform the more arduous task of transforming
IFCI from a bureaucratic and uninspired set-up into an aggressive,
on-the-ball institution. No doubt, a large part of IFCI's malaise stems
from the government's majority ownership of 51 per cent.
Narasimham admits that the government has a
say in policy-making at the institution. But adds that it is in no way a
disadvantage.
ICRA's Chaudhury, however, is unequivocal
that for IFCI to turn around, the government must lower its stake to 26
per cent, as in the case of ICICI. But, with a little over a year to go
before Narasimham retires, a turnaround of IFCI is probably not on the
horizon he gets to see from his 18th-floor office.
|