|
ACQUISITION
Why JCT Is Selling Its
Polyester Business...
...and why Reliance is buying it. An
exclusive look at the details of the deal-to-be.
By
Ranju Sarkar
If events
surrounding the acquisition of JCT Ltd's polyester division by Reliance
Industries Ltd (RIL) come with a generous dash of déjà vu that's because
the classic Ambani-touch is very much in evidence: yet another polyester
plant; yet another company in financial distress; and yet another buy-out
for a steal. Neither RIL nor JCT would comment on the subject, but some of
the latter's creditors confirmed that the liability-based deal
(transaction value: Rs 148 crore) was on.
Terene Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd, a Reliance
Group company, has proposed two options to a consortium of JCT's
creditors. One, it will pay out Rs 160 crore as a one-time settlement of
the Rs 492 crore (the rest will have to be written off) the polyester
division owes the 43 banks and financial institutions who make up the
consortium.
Two, the division's debt will be
restructured, reducing it to around Rs 444 crore; Terene will pay the
creditors a third of this (Rs 148 crore) in cash; a third as equity in
itself; and a third as zero-coupon debt redeemable at the end of 13 years.
The total sum involved in this three-tier transaction, explains Manish
Saxena, an analyst at Mumbai-based securities firm First Global: ''Can't
be more than what Polysindo was willing to offer.''
Polysindo Eka Perkasa, part of the Hong
Kong-based Texmaco group, had agreed to buy the polyester division for Rs
504 crore in September, 1997, signed a sale deed for Rs 413 crore in
December, 1997, and brought the price down to Rs 395 crore after a
due-diligence exercise in March, 1998, before finally calling it off in
the wake of the South East Asian crisis in April, 1998. The second
proposal has found favour with most creditors, but Terene has informed
individual constituents of the consortium that they're free to choose
either.
The deal makes sense for JCT: the company's
debt, at Rs 1,141 crore (on December 31, 1999), is almost identical to its
turnover for the year ended September 30, 2000, and the sale of the
polyester division is just one part of a larger effort to restructure the
company's debt (See The Finer Facts). Sameer Thapar, JCT 's Joint Managing
Director, refused to speak to BT.
The RIL gameplan
The
Finer Facts |
» Thapars
agree to infuse Rs 80 crore & write off the Rs 84 crore debt
extended to JCT in 1997
»
Institutions
agree to waive off Rs 107 crore debt; restructured debt stands at Rs
324 crore
»
JCT makes
Rs 59 crore down-payment for institutional dues, issues zero-coupon
debt of Rs 59 crore
»
Also
issues preference shares worth Rs 20 crore to FIs; converts Rs 18
crore liabilities into equity
»
Residual
firm left with interest-bearing debt of Rs 168 crore & annual
interest burden of Rs 25 crore |
Reliance does have a history of snapping up
sub-scale capacities: starting from its acquisition of ICI's 30,000 tpa
(tonnes per annum) PSF (Polyester Staple Fibre) facility at Thane in
Maharashtra, the company has bought close to 200,000 tpa of capacity over
the last seven years (See Reliance: The Acquisition Trail). Explains
Sanjeev Prasad, Analyst, Kotak Securities: ''It's better to acquire a
capacity than build fresh capacity. You are taking over marketshare and
competition.'' For instance, when RIL acquired DCL Polyester's 40,000 tpa
PFY (Polyester Filament Yarn) plant, its marketshare increased from 33 per
cent to 38 per cent. RIL's real gains, however, could be in terms of
enhanced reach, better supply-chain management, and feedstock-linkages.
The JCT acquisition will cut RIL's time to
reach the northern markets. Says a senior executive at a Mumbai-based
Polyester major: ''Why does an FMCG company create warehouses? To enable
it reach its customers. (Using the same logic), JCT provides Reliance with
an opportunity to service markets.'' Equally critical from the RIL-perspective
is the pta (Purified Terephthalic Acid ) connection. pta is the basic
input in the manufacture of polyester, and Reliance uses just 0.7 million
tonnes of the 1.15 million tonnes it produces. Every acquisition,
sub-scale or not, increases the captive consumption of this pta. And
freight-economics (it costs Rs 2.50 to transport a kilogram of PSF over a
distance of 1,000 km; for a kilogram of pta it costs Rs 0.75) make it
cheaper for the company to manufacture PSF locally.
Restructuring
JCT |
When
the Industrial Finance Corporation of India (IFCI), the lead
financial institution for JCT, convened a joint meeting of JCT's
lenders on February 15, 2000, to consider the hiving off of the
fibre unit to Terene Fibres, Indian and foreign banks insisted on
a parallel restructuring of the residual company's debt (Rs 649
crore on December 31, 1999). So, JCT submitted a proposal on
February 22, 2000, wherein the Thapars would infuse Rs 80 crore
(in two tranches of Rs 50 crore and Rs 30 crore), and recast the
equity from Rs 120 crore to Rs 83 crore, while FIs would
reciprocate by writing off some debt.
The Rs 649 crore debt
includes current liabilities of Rs 89 crore; but since the company
has matching current assets, this amount was not considered for
restructuring. Leaving out the Rs 103 crore of unsecured debt (the
Thapars are to write off Rs 84 crore of unsecured debt they
extended to JCT in 1997) and the Rs 25 crore of lease rentals, the
residual company would be left with a debt of Rs 432 crore. The
same will be restructured to Rs 324 crore, with the lenders
waiving off the remaining debt-foreign banks will waive off Rs 58
crore while Indian banks and FIs would waive off Rs 49 crore.
Of this Rs 324 crore,
JCT will make a down-payment of Rs 59 crore to banks and FIs;
issue Rs 59 crore worth of zero-coupon debentures to be repaid
over a six-to-nine year period and Rs 20 crore worth of OPCPS
(Optional Partly Convertible Preference Shares), 20 per cent of
which could be converted into equity in the eighth year; and
convert Rs 18 crore of loans into equity.
Thus, the residual firm
would have Rs 168 crore debt, Rs 97 crore of non-interest
liabilities, an annual interest burden of Rs 25 crore, and lease
rentals of Rs 2 crore. Can these be serviced by the profits from
textiles (operating profits of Rs 39 crore) as the steel and the
nylon divisions don't make too much money? Clearly, the Thapars
and FIs believe it's better to be late than declared sick. |
RIL also has the option of using the
smaller-capacity manufacturing facilities it acquires to produce
value-added fibres like triobal that fetch Rs 4-5 more a kilogram than PSF.
This is not required in the same quantity as white polyester, and by using
the smaller facilities for their manufacture, RIL will save on things like
change-over time at its larger plants. Thus, the acquisition of JCT's
polyester division can only help Reliance consolidate its position in the
petrochemical and polyester industry. At a throwaway price.
|