| INTERVIEW: PRAMOD MAHAJAN, MINISTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
 "I
      am not here to create red tape"
 He's one of the most visible and
      articulate faces of the Vajpayee government. But when he took over as the
      minister for the newly-formed Information Technology Ministry 14 months
      ago, he had to contend with a skeptical industry, which wondered why the
      ministry had been formed at all. They don't ask that question anymore. In
      an interview with BT's Ashutosh
      Sinha and
      Bharat
      Ahluwalia,
      the IT Minister Pramod Mahajan, explained how his ministry
      won over the infotech czars and what the government is trying to do to
      spread the infotech revolution further. Excerpts:  Q. When the information technology
      ministry was created, there were a lot of apprehensions about whether such
      a ministry was needed. Have these been laid to rest?
 
      A. Frankly, I don't think I am the right person to respond to that
      question. This comment was made by people in the industry and they are the
      right people to decide. For my part, all I can say is that I have made it
      clear that I am not here as a regulator, but as a facilitator. I am not
      here to create red tape, but with a red carpet. I told them you can deal
      with me as a friend and a guide. Treat me as your lobbyist in this
      government. I sincerely believe that the infotech revolution has changed
      the image of Indians internationally. For the first time in the history of
      independent India, we have something to feel proud of. So, it's my duty to
      see that from the government's side we remove obstacles rather than create
      them. So, how successful have you been?  It's been about 14 months now, and what we've actually done in this
      time has little parallel in India's history of lawmaking. We drafted the
      IT Act, presented it to Parliament, sent it to the Standing Committee, got
      it passed by Parliament, framed rules and regulations, and made the
      necessary appointments. This law was needed for e-governance and
      e-commerce, since neither was possible without legal sanction. It's true that till today digital
      signatures aren't valid, since there is no certifying authority yet. I do
      have a Controller for Digital Certification, and will in a few months have
      a certifying authority. Then, people can register their signatures and get
      their numbers. That's when technically e-commerce and e-governance can
      start. On the law-making side, the last budget saw
      some initial problems, relating to concessions given to software
      technology parks. I believe I was able to lobby with the finance minister
      and he was kind enough to change things to the satisfaction of the
      industry. I have an IT advisory committee, comprising
      a virtual who's who of the Indian IT and telecom industry. They have met
      twice and if you see their responses to the issues raised in the meeting,
      the active correspondence they maintain on issues discussed and in their
      conversations with me, I can say that the industry is happy with the
      creation of the IT ministry. After a year, I can say with some sense of
      pride, that if tomorrow this ministry is abolished, the IT industry will
      miss it. I may be one of the few ministers who often
      meets the finance minister, taking my proposals from the industry.
      Budget-making in this country is done at the bureaucratic level. The
      secretaries meet and take the decisions. Seldom does a minister call on
      the finance minister, saying I would like to get these things done. I
      think I am one of the few who lobby for their ministries. To the best of
      my knowledge no other minister does this. What are the demands that you have
      placed before the finance minister for this budget?  There are many tax anomalies, and naturally, the industry always wants
      the lowest taxes. I want IT penetration to increase, so wherever changes
      in tax rates help do that, I want that concession. We must make computers
      as cheap as possible, but taxation is only one part of that. What efforts are being made to bring
      infotech to the education and health sectors?  
       The department of education has made a beginning. My real worry is
      whether distance education will replace the classroom. On paper, or in
      theory, it seems to be very rosy-one best teacher in the country can teach
      a billion people. But again, the availability of computers is limited. I
      can donate computers to selected schools. But from where will I get the
      electricity between 10 and six. In theory, these applications are
      exciting. But in practice, I am afraid things won't change overnight. But the one area in the public sector where
      we have not made an effort is health. I recently inaugurated one of the
      rural centres of Apollo Hospital. I asked them to provide me with a video
      film I could show to the 800 Members of Parliament on how IT can make a
      big difference to the healthcare system. Using infotech helps, but the
      public sector has not taken an initiative yet. It is still at the 'talking
      level', apart from one or two examples. One experiment we are doing is in the North
      East: we are connecting 484 blocks with what we call CIC (Community
      Information Centres). We have already completed 30 blocks as a pilot
      project. These 484 blocks will be interconnected and each will also be
      connected via VSAT with the rest of the world. When this project is
      complete, you will have centres at block levels that the state government
      can use for educating people, e-governance, health, and others. So, this
      is really an ambitious project and a lot depends on how state governments
      can exploit the infrastructure. My ambition is that in every state, one
      block should have a centre like this. Is there any private
      participation?  
       No. Only the government is involved at present. But many companies
      have offered to participate in this. Microsoft has, for example, offered
      to participate. I had gone last summer to MIT to visit their Media Lab. It
      was then that I thought of having a similar thing in India. They said
      there wasn't anything like that anywhere else in the world. Ireland is the
      country where Media Lab, Europe, will be located. The site is yet to be
      selected though. Similarly, Media Lab, Asia, is to be located in India. I
      think within the next three-to-four months it will become a reality. MIT
      has told me that they will fund the project to the tune of 80 per cent and
      expect me to finance the rest, which will work out to Rs 500 crore over a
      10-year period. I think it will be prestigious for India if Media Lab,
      Asia, is set up here. But the biggest problem that the IT
      industry is facing today is the lack of telecom infrastructure. How will
      that problem be solved?  On policy issues, as long as you have different ministries you cannot
      go faster. We have a convergence bill. So, are we
      going to end up having a converged ministry?  No. This has nothing to do with the convergence of ministries. You
      cannot expect one minister to look after telecom, IT, as well as
      communications. Which states are leading in terms of IT
      initiatives? How well are they doing? 
       Basically, there are seven states, the four southern states, Madhya
      Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Gujarat. Unfortunately, (parts of) Gujarat will
      have to do it all over again. But, I am not satisfied with these states'
      progress. Actually, Indian states compare themselves with their own past.
     |