|
CASE GAME: INTEGRATION
The Case Of
Post-Acquisition Strategy
How will Sunrise integrate the formerly
state-owned Alco into its umbrella? Ajit Kumar of Accenture, Prashant
Srivastava of TSM, and Haresh Shah of mergersindia.com discuss.
By R.
Chandrasekhar
Surinder
Khanna, Chairman and Managing Director of Sunrise Metal Industries, signed
the cheque with a flourish. It was as though he was signalling the end of
a traumatic saga that had hogged media headlines for long. Once the cheque
was handed over at the special ceremony scheduled to be held at the office
of the disinvestment ministry in New Delhi that evening, Sunrise would
formally acquire 51 per cent stake in the state-owned Aluminium Co of
India Ltd (Alco). ''It's a battle well fought,'' Khanna thought to
himself.
The government's divesture at Alco had
attracted controversy in the corridors of power with which the low-profile
Khanna was not too comfortable. The ideological overtones had overshadowed
business considerations for months. But, hopefully, all that would soon be
in the past. Even as the sense of relief among the members of the A-team
seated around his desk was palpable, Khanna was quick to remind them that
the real task was only beginning. ''It is time to get down to business,''
he said.
|
The drivers
of reorganisation |
Securing the
lowest unit cost of aluminium |
Exploiting the
benefits of scale economies |
Gaining
control over the entire value chain |
Moving from
commoditisation to brand-building |
The risks in
reorganisation |
Duplication of
resources, without cost savings |
Fragmentation
of capacities and competencies |
Accumulation
of organisational fat |
Loss of touch
with the customer |
|
|
Acquisitions were not new at Sunrise. The
company had consciously avoided organic growth in pursuit of its goal of
becoming 'the lowest-cost producer of metals'. It had interests in copper
and zinc, in addition to aluminium, and had extensive refining facilities
in interior Maharashtra. As part of consolidating its position in the
high-end aluminium market, it had taken over Surabhi Aluminium in Chennai
three years ago.
The purchase of a majority stake at Alco
would now give Sunrise access to captive mines, refining, and smelting
facilities, and also a power plant at a sprawling estate in Orissa.
Sunrise would soon become the third-largest player in the upstream range
of standard and specialty alumina products targeted at the growing markets
of refractories, ceramics, electronics, and electricals. The company would
also become the second-largest manufacturer of rolled products targeted
primarily at burgeoning industry segments such as building,
transportation, consumer durables, packaging, and telecommunications.
''We have moved one step forward in the
value chain,'' said Naveen Chintan, Director (Business Development),
excitedly. ''Of course,'' agreed Khanna. ''But,'' he added a note of
caution, ''if costs go out of control, we will be moving two steps
backward. So, we had better watch out.''
''This is an opportunity to replicate our
success with Surabhi,'' said Vidur Chalapathi, Director (Operations), who
had not only overseen the merger of Surabhi with Sunrise, but also had
managed a quick turnaround of Surabhi, which had been making losses prior
to its takeover by Sunrise. ''Let us not forget, Vidur, that the context
is different,'' said Ashwin Narayan, Director (Finance). ''The merger of
Surbahi gave tax benefits to Sunrise. And the cost structure was
manageable because Surabhi had still not exhausted the long-term statutory
benefits associated with a greenfield project. Alco, on the other hand, is
profitable although its costs are high. Surabhi was a small but integrated
unit. In contrast, Alco is several times bigger.''
''But Vidur is right about the learnings,''
said Vishnu Vardhan, Director (hr). ''We have tightened the operations at
Surabhi. The unit costs are down by 30 per cent in two years. There is a
renewed focus on efficiency, quality, and customer service. In fact, we
have used those benchmarks to improve our operations at Aurangabad. I am
sure we can replicate our success on a larger scale at Alco and make it
more profitable.''
''We have taken over Alco not just to run
it profitably, but use it as a platform to take on the international
market,'' said Rakesh Mathur, Director (Marketing). ''Cost control is a
crucial plank for us. Costs in a commodity business like aluminium can be
controlled only through economies of scale. We now have scale. But the
disadvantage is that all our aluminium units are far flung. Can we
eliminate duplication of resources and rationalise common costs in such a
situation?''
''It would be good to work towards a
situation where all aluminium-related operations are brought under one
single umbrella that gives it a focus,'' said Vardhan. ''It means
merger,'' said Khanna. ''There are two reasons why I have some
reservations. Once we merge Alco with Sunrise, we would invariably have
government nominees on the parent board. I would rather have the
government's role confined to the operations of Alco alone. Second, Alco
is a high-cost unit. I would first concentrate on reducing costs and
bringing its operational benchmarks on par with Sunrise before thinking of
a merger. After all, Alco has a baggage. Integration becomes far easier
when there are common business drivers.''
''There are several costs that are out of
control at Alco,'' said Narayan. ''The workforce, for one. It is 45 per
cent higher than our norm. We can, of course, offer VRS, but there is a
pre-emptive clause that runs for a year. And then, electricity, which is
our major raw material. The cost of captive power at Alco is about Rs 3
per unit, which is 60 per cent higher than that of Sunrise. And the
capacity utilisation of the plant-a critical cost element in a commodity
business-must be ramped up. There are also large social overheads at Alco.
Township management, for example, is a non-core activity. It must be
outsourced. There is also the Cost Of Poor Quality (COPQ), which is higher
by about 65 per cent. My point is that a merger with a large but
poorly-run plant like Alco might impact negatively on the overall
operations of Sunrise. That is a risk we should avoid.''
''In fact, in my view, we should break up
each activity in the value chain into an independent strategic business
unit,'' said Mathur. ''The focus is different. Mining requires optimum
utilisation of capacity. Smelting and refining require not only
technological sophistication but also continuous monitoring of costs.
High-end products require brand building and customer focus.''
''An immediate fallout of the strategic
business unit (SBU) structure is escalation of costs,'' said Khanna. ''An
SBU, therefore, hardly fits in with our low-cost ambition. A merger, on
the other hand, gives us the advantage of size, which is in tune with our
global aspirations. We can leverage size to acquire new units-locally and
overseas-and grow bigger with each passing year.''
Readings List
CASE
SOLUTIONS
Send us your solution
|