CASE SOLUTIONS
Cut Costs And Seek AlliancesThe
reasons behind hind's predicament are two fold: an absence of vision and
foresight; and the inability to respond to changing competitive trends in
the market. The signals would have been evident well in advance. That
Sethi did not catch them in time is clearly a failure on his part. While
finding a new CEO is certainly a step in the right direction, it is only
part of the solution. It is important, in my view, that the incumbent is
from the synthetics industry. Time is not on Hind's side. The new CEO
cannot simply have the luxury of a learning period, and he should be able
to bring to bear a strong techno-commercial orientation on the job from
day one.
|
"The
immediate priority at Hind is to arrest cash losses and generate
enough liquidity in the working capital cycle."
R.C. Bagrodia, Chairman GSL India
|
|
The immediate priority at Hind is to arrest
cash losses. The second is to generate enough liquidity in the working
capital cycle. Both these measures can together help build confidence
levels among lenders who can then be persuaded to agree to measures like a
moratorium on payment of interest and the rescheduling of loans. There are
four measures that I suggest in this context.
- Focus on exports: Rayon in particular has
high export potential. Hind should target to export at least 25 per cent
of its production. This move reduces the rate of interest by 4 to 5 per
cent, and brings in the benefits of incentives like packing credit. It
also eases pressure on working capital by a minimum of 25 per cent.
- Go in for domestic alliances: Hind should
identify niche segments within each product category towards enhancing
revenues from domestic sales. These would be areas where the customer is
assured of a value added offering. Close on the heels of this initiative,
Hind should quickly strike alliances with one or two major customers in
each category. Alliances with these ''preferred customers'' could take
various forms depending on mutual benefits but the major fallout is that
Hind will be able to secure tangible benefits from each alliance. These
could be liberal credit terms for supply of raw materials, advance
payments for sales orders accepted, or payment against delivery. All these
steps enhance liquidity in the working capital system. Alliances will also
improve the image and credibility of Hind. That in turn could help secure
better terms from other business associates.
- Cut costs: Next only to raw materials, which
comprise 60 per cent of the cost of production, power is a major item of
cost at about 18 per cent. Putting up a furnace-oil-based power
plant-which the institutions would be willing to finance-cuts power costs
by 50 per cent. Even leasing a dg set can cut power costs by 30 per cent.
Another element of cost is the payroll. Hind
should follow the example of a number of firms in the country that have
managed to achieve a voluntary reduction in wages and salaries to tide
over difficult times.
- Finally, Hind should source finished goods
from both domestic and overseas manufacturers and use its existing
marketing resources to sell them at a higher margin towards generating
quick cash.
The
turnaround-strategy should cover three specific areas over the long-term.
The first comprises changes in management and corporate governance.
Clearly, it is time for Hind to call in a professional manager. It is, of
course, imperative that he should have successfully managed turnarounds in
the past. But it is also imperative that he should have the support of not
only the existing management but, of the consortium of lenders as well.
The time is ripe to install a rigorous framework of corporate governance
as part of an attempt to enhance shareholder value.
|
"The
basic question here is whether it makes sense for Hind to retain all
its existing four product lines.
Shailesh Haribhakti, Director, Haribhakti Financial
Services
|
|
The second area pertains to business
restructuring. Hind must evolve a business restructuring plan based on a
detailed analysis of the viability of its current operations. The basic
question here is whether it makes sense to retain all existing products.
Hind must identify the markets in which it can create a niche for itself
by fully leveraging its available pool of resources. A detailed SWOT
analysis of each of its four products could help the company.
It may be prudent to consider each product as
an individual strategic business unit. It is possible that Hind's limited
capacity turns out to be its strength-particularly while operating in
niche markets. The SBU approach will help separate non-viable units from
the mainstream business and facilitates their sale to companies who may
find a better strategic fit. As part of this exercise, it is necessary to
reassess manpower requirement in all viable units.
The third area pertains to financial
restructuring. A major risk here is in undertaking it in isolation of the
business restructuring exercise. Financial restructuring can only support
the existing business restructuring plans and should be dictated by the
'servicing capacity' of the chosen business model.
While detailed business plans for next five
to seven years should be chalked out as part of these initiatives, Hind
should examine how it can best leverage its brand. For instance,
technology partnerships can enhance its brand equity.
In the short-term, of course, Hind should
prune costs across the board, liquidate unproductive and non-core assets,
and improve cash flows. The company should utilise the cash from the
liquidation of unproductive assets and funds from the divestment to reduce
its debt and improve its working capital position.
Hind should also take up contract
manufacturing for larger players. This will not only generate resources
but also enhance its credibility in the market. Catering to export
markets-or importing from a supplier-are some other options.
A successful transition will require clear
and well-understood strategy, a buy-in of this strategy at all levels of
the organisation, customer orientation and flawless implementation. A
dedicated task force should be created to implement and monitor these
strategies.
Hind's
very survival is at stake. There are, therefore, some immediate measures
it should take to ensure that the business continues to run and on course.
These measures are, by their very nature, aimed at scoring some quick
hits.
|
"The
message should be clear: minimise spending and get the biggest bang
from every buck you spend."
Ajit Kumar, Partner Accenture
|
|
- Cost reduction: This must be undertaken on an
aggressive basis covering all aspects including raw material, working
capital, logistics and manpower.
- Financial restructuring: This covers a wide
area, but three areas that Hind should focus on are, securing a reduction
in interest rates, extending its repayment schedules; and converting its
debt to equity. Evidently, the consortium of lenders will drive this
initiative.
- Getting a grip on product profitability:
Herein lies the key to survival. Hind should identify products that make a
negative contribution (after accounting for working capital cost) and
rationalise its product portfolio without delay. This single step will go
a long way in stopping the internal haemorrhage at Hind.
- Liquidating unproductive assets: Selling off
surplus office space and land, and outsourcing are some of the measures
that Hind should undertake to generate immediate cash.
The message in the medium- to long-term is,
'consolidate and grow'. This requires Hind to pursue the following
initiatives.
- Get the business focus right: Hind should
undertake only those businesses that have a potential for the future. This
assessment should factor in issues related to scale because of the
impending rationalisation of the Customs duty structure as recommended by
the WTO. That would open the Indian marketplace to global players.
- Divest: Hind should simply exit from
businesses that do not have a long-term future.
- Restructure: It makes sense to look at each
product as a distinct business entity. This will enable realistic
valuations resulting in possibilities of raising funds at competitive
rates for businesses that have a long-term future.
In those businesses that have been identified
as having a bright future, Hind would have to decide whether it wants to
be a volume player or a speciality player.
In case it chooses to be a speciality player,
the company will need to enhance quality, focus on R&D and tie up with
a commodity player like Vimoline to provide customers with a complete
basket of products. This may be the preferred approach. However, if it
chooses to be a volume player, it will have to look at significant
capacity enhancements as well as expanding markets at home and overseas.
This is a decision that it should take once the issue of survival has been
dealt with successfully.
Send us your solution
|