| CASE SOLUTIONS
 Cut Costs And Seek Alliances
 The
      reasons behind hind's predicament are two fold: an absence of vision and
      foresight; and the inability to respond to changing competitive trends in
      the market. The signals would have been evident well in advance. That
      Sethi did not catch them in time is clearly a failure on his part. While
      finding a new CEO is certainly a step in the right direction, it is only
      part of the solution. It is important, in my view, that the incumbent is
      from the synthetics industry. Time is not on Hind's side. The new CEO
      cannot simply have the luxury of a learning period, and he should be able
      to bring to bear a strong techno-commercial orientation on the job from
      day one. 
        
          | 
 |  
          | 
 "The
            immediate priority at Hind is to arrest cash losses and generate
            enough liquidity in the working capital cycle."R.C. Bagrodia, Chairman GSL India
 |  
          | 
 |  The immediate priority at Hind is to arrest
      cash losses. The second is to generate enough liquidity in the working
      capital cycle. Both these measures can together help build confidence
      levels among lenders who can then be persuaded to agree to measures like a
      moratorium on payment of interest and the rescheduling of loans. There are
      four measures that I suggest in this context. 
        Focus on exports: Rayon in particular has
      high export potential. Hind should target to export at least 25 per cent
      of its production. This move reduces the rate of interest by 4 to 5 per
      cent, and brings in the benefits of incentives like packing credit. It
      also eases pressure on working capital by a minimum of 25 per cent. 
        Go in for domestic alliances:  Hind should
      identify niche segments within each product category towards enhancing
      revenues from domestic sales. These would be areas where the customer is
      assured of a value added offering. Close on the heels of this initiative,
      Hind should quickly strike alliances with one or two major customers in
      each category. Alliances with these ''preferred customers'' could take
      various forms depending on mutual benefits but the major fallout is that
      Hind will be able to secure tangible benefits from each alliance. These
      could be liberal credit terms for supply of raw materials, advance
      payments for sales orders accepted, or payment against delivery. All these
      steps enhance liquidity in the working capital system. Alliances will also
      improve the image and credibility of Hind. That in turn could help secure
      better terms from other business associates. 
        Cut costs: Next only to raw materials, which
      comprise 60 per cent of the cost of production, power is a major item of
      cost at about 18 per cent. Putting up a furnace-oil-based power
      plant-which the institutions would be willing to finance-cuts power costs
      by 50 per cent. Even leasing a dg set can cut power costs by 30 per cent. Another element of cost is the payroll. Hind
      should follow the example of a number of firms in the country that have
      managed to achieve a voluntary reduction in wages and salaries to tide
      over difficult times. 
        Finally, Hind should source finished goods
      from both domestic and overseas manufacturers and use its existing
      marketing resources to sell them at a higher margin towards generating
      quick cash. The
      turnaround-strategy should cover three specific areas over the long-term.
      The first comprises changes in management and corporate governance.
      Clearly, it is time for Hind to call in a professional manager. It is, of
      course, imperative that he should have successfully managed turnarounds in
      the past. But it is also imperative that he should have the support of not
      only the existing management but, of the consortium of lenders as well.
      The time is ripe to install a rigorous framework of corporate governance
      as part of an attempt to enhance shareholder value. 
        
          | 
 |  
          | 
 "The
            basic question here is whether it makes sense for Hind to retain all
            its existing four product lines.Shailesh Haribhakti, Director, Haribhakti Financial
            Services
 |  
          | 
 |  The second area pertains to business
      restructuring. Hind must evolve a business restructuring plan based on a
      detailed analysis of the viability of its current operations. The basic
      question here is whether it makes sense to retain all existing products.
      Hind must identify the markets in which it can create a niche for itself
      by fully leveraging its available pool of resources. A detailed SWOT
      analysis of each of its four products could help the company. It may be prudent to consider each product as
      an individual strategic business unit. It is possible that Hind's limited
      capacity turns out to be its strength-particularly while operating in
      niche markets. The SBU approach will help separate non-viable units from
      the mainstream business and facilitates their sale to companies who may
      find a better strategic fit. As part of this exercise, it is necessary to
      reassess manpower requirement in all viable units. The third area pertains to financial
      restructuring. A major risk here is in undertaking it in isolation of the
      business restructuring exercise. Financial restructuring can only support
      the existing business restructuring plans and should be dictated by the
      'servicing capacity' of the chosen business model. While detailed business plans for next five
      to seven years should be chalked out as part of these initiatives, Hind
      should examine how it can best leverage its brand. For instance,
      technology partnerships can enhance its brand equity. In the short-term, of course, Hind should
      prune costs across the board, liquidate unproductive and non-core assets,
      and improve cash flows. The company should utilise the cash from the
      liquidation of unproductive assets and funds from the divestment to reduce
      its debt and improve its working capital position. Hind should also take up contract
      manufacturing for larger players. This will not only generate resources
      but also enhance its credibility in the market. Catering to export
      markets-or importing from a supplier-are some other options. A successful transition will require clear
      and well-understood strategy, a buy-in of this strategy at all levels of
      the organisation, customer orientation and flawless implementation. A
      dedicated task force should be created to implement and monitor these
      strategies. Hind's
      very survival is at stake. There are, therefore, some immediate measures
      it should take to ensure that the business continues to run and on course.
      These measures are, by their very nature, aimed at scoring some quick
      hits. 
        
          | 
 |  
          | 
 "The
            message should be clear: minimise spending and get the biggest bang
            from every buck you spend."Ajit Kumar, Partner Accenture
 |  
          | 
 |  
        Cost reduction: This must be undertaken on an
      aggressive basis covering all aspects including raw material, working
      capital, logistics and manpower. 
        Financial restructuring:  This covers a wide
      area, but three areas that Hind should focus on are, securing a reduction
      in interest rates, extending its repayment schedules; and converting its
      debt to equity. Evidently, the consortium of lenders will drive this
      initiative. 
        Getting a grip on product profitability:
          
      Herein lies the key to survival. Hind should identify products that make a
      negative contribution (after accounting for working capital cost) and
      rationalise its product portfolio without delay. This single step will go
      a long way in stopping the internal haemorrhage at Hind. 
        Liquidating unproductive assets:  Selling off
      surplus office space and land, and outsourcing are some of the measures
      that Hind should undertake to generate immediate cash. The message in the medium- to long-term is,
      'consolidate and grow'. This requires Hind to pursue the following
      initiatives. 
        Get the business focus right: Hind should
      undertake only those businesses that have a potential for the future. This
      assessment should factor in issues related to scale because of the
      impending rationalisation of the Customs duty structure as recommended by
      the WTO. That would open the Indian marketplace to global players. 
        Divest:  Hind should simply exit from
      businesses that do not have a long-term future. 
        Restructure:  It makes sense to look at each
      product as a distinct business entity. This will enable realistic
      valuations resulting in possibilities of raising funds at competitive
      rates for businesses that have a long-term future. In those businesses that have been identified
      as having a bright future, Hind would have to decide whether it wants to
      be a volume player or a speciality player. In case it chooses to be a speciality player,
      the company will need to enhance quality, focus on R&D and tie up with
      a commodity player like Vimoline to provide customers with a complete
      basket of products. This may be the preferred approach. However, if it
      chooses to be a volume player, it will have to look at significant
      capacity enhancements as well as expanding markets at home and overseas.
      This is a decision that it should take once the issue of survival has been
      dealt with successfully. Send us your solution
      
      
 |