|
COMPETITION
Network Busy
Wipro has a stake in a call-centre
company. HCL Tech has a subsidiary in the business. And transnationals are
increasingly setting up their own. Now, where's the room for small
enterprise?
By Moinak
Mitra
On October
18, while declaring the company's results for the second quarter of this
financial year to analysts and the business press, Wipro Chairman Azim
Premji and Vice Chairman Vivek Paul slipped in an announcement about a
surprise acquisition. India's most valuable software maker was acquiring
17 per cent in equity and 7 per cent in preffered stock of call-centre
company Spectramind for Rs 48 crore.
WHY
A SHAKEOUT |
FUNDING:
Most small call centers are funded by venture capitalists who are
unwilling to wait for returns and pull the plug.
CAPITAL:
It takes at least Rs 50 crore to put up a 500-seater international
call center; most entrepreneurs can't afford this.
EXPERTISE: Companies can move
into high-end IT-enabled services only by building or acquiring
skills; again, this isn't easy for all companies.
MARKETING: To make it as an
international call center, a company will have to invest in
marketing its services abroad; few can afford to. |
LOOMS
LARGE |
TECHNOLOGY:
Given the obsolescence curves, companies have to invest
in upgrading technical skills and equipments; that's difficult for
some.
MANPOWER:
Manpower costs that account for up to 35 per cent of
operating costs, and high attrition rates may faze smaller
companies.
COUNTRY-COMPETITION: Yesterday's
call center capitals like UK and Australia are renewing their
efforts to catch up with India.
MNC-COMPETITION: MNCs are
discovering the many advantages of investing in their call center
operations in India. |
Eleven days later, on October 29, HCL
Technologies, which entered the business on February 6, 2001, through a
subsidiary eServe, announced the formation of a 90:10 joint venture with
British Telecom to run a 400-seat call centre in Belfast.
That's bad news for Mr Gupta. Mr G, the chief
exec of an international call centre who'd like to remain unnamed told
this correspondent, is a self-made shirt tycoon. One day, the CEO received
a visit from the portly 40-something exporter. ''Sign on as a director in
my new company,'' exhorted Mr G, ''and I will fill your hands with gold.''
It didn't take long for the man to find out why Mr G was so keen to have
him on board; he wished to put up a call centre. The reasoning behind this
decision? ''I've invested Rs 35,000 per sewing machine; each machine sits
on a 2.5 square feet table; and I have it on authority that I can increase
my returns 300 per cent by investing the same amount in a call centre.''
Mr G may belong to the realm of apocrypha,
but fact is, call centres were the great white hope for everyone who hoped
to make it big in the turbulent 2000s. The domain attracted all kinds:
angel-funded Defection Capital, like Raman Roy who left GE's call centre
ops in India to start Spectramind; entrepreneurs trying to regain their
past tech glory, like DCM Data Products' Veer Sagar who went the
medical-transcription way; software hotshops, like HCL Tech and TCS (it
has a JV in the call centre business with HDFC) keen not to miss out on a
possible revenue stream; transnationals like Conseco's EXL Service; even
cash-rich corporates like the Emami group and the Hero group, looking for
diversification opportunities.
|
SUJIT BAKSHI,
CEO HCL eServe Technology
The entry of serious
software player like HCL eServe Tech bodes ill for small-time
entrepreneurs hoping to make a quick buck
|
Meanwhile, the business itself has acquired
enough aliases to do a fbi-10-Most-Wanted lister proud: it-enabled
services, business process outsourcing, and back-end processing.
Irrespective of the name, though, each company was (and is) in the same
business. And that was leveraging India's time-zone advantage (it is day
here when it is night there), and huge pool of cost-effective graduate and
post-graduate labour to do what are, at the end of the day, fairly mundane
and routine tasks. In some cases it was all about following up on credit
card payments; in others, answering customer queries; in still others,
processing insurance claims, maintaining books of accounts, or
transcribing medical records.
There was reason enough for the sector to
boom: a study conducted by International Data Corporation (IDC) for the
National Association for Software and Service Companies (Nasscom),
estimates revenues from it-enabled services to contribute Rs 4,800 crore
($1 billion) by 2005. And a recent report by research firm Frost and
Sullivan puts the size of the business today at Rs 1,146 crore ($244
million). Compared to projections on India's total software exports in
2001-02, Rs 40,000 crore, that may seem like chump change, but it is the
growth rate, 30 per cent, that served (and continues to serve) as a magnet
for companies.
But the entry of serious software players
into the sector bodes ill for small-time entrepreneurs hoping to make a
quick buck with 50 or 100-seater call centres. And as India's competitive
edge in the business (cost, cost, and cost) starts to pale marginally,
continuing competition from countries that have traditionally housed call-centre
clusters-Canada, UK, Ireland, and Australia-is starting to tell. For Sujit
Bakshi, the chief executive of hcl eServe Technologies, it is strangely
reminiscent of the past. ''In 1985, the government gave permission to
130-odd pc manufacturers to sell their PCs. Today, only two survive.''
|
ISHITA
SWARUP & TINA SAPRA, (L to R), Directors, Orion Dialog
Orion Dialog caters
exclusively to the domestic market and services clients like AirTel
and Nokia, and makes a reasonable go of it
|
Country-competitiveness (See How the
Countries Stack Up) is only one reason for the impending shake-out in the
business. Funding is another. Starved of good dotcom and tech investments,
several venture capital firms invested in call centres. But the slowdown
in the US-the main market for Indian call centre services-has only served
to lengthen the already long gestation period in the business.
Then, there is the issue of scalability. ''If
you cannot convince the client that you will be able to ramp up fast,
should the business demand it, there's no chance of any business coming
your way,'' says Samir Chopra, the founder-President of Cybiz, a
100-seater call centre located at Gurgaon (near Delhi). But while all
these matter, the one thing driving the shakeout is the very
characteristic of the call centre business.
The typical Indian call centre charges
customers between Rs 384 and Rs 576 ($8 and $12) a hour (per seat) for
providing e-mail services, Rs 720 and Rs 864 ($15 and $18) a hour for real
time chat, Rs 875 and Rs 1,680 ($25 and $35) a hour for voice-based
services, and Rs 1,680 and above ($35 upwards) for technical help. The
last includes value-added business process outsourcing activities such as
processing insurance claims, mining customer databases for information and
maintaining books of account. Operating margins vary from as less as 15
per cent for low-end e-mail contact centres to 60 per cent for bpo-centres.
Ergo, the only way a company wanting to succeed at the low-end of the
business can do so is by building up its volumes.
Therein lies the catch; it takes between Rs 8
lakh and Rs 10 lakh per seat to put up a call centre focussed on the
international market. That works out to around Rs 10 crore for a
100-seater, and that amount doesn't include the operational costs.
''Indian companies need to build outstanding management teams, be
adequately capitalised, and have extensive human resource orientation to
succeed in the business,'' says Sanjeev Aggarwal, CEO, Daksh eServices, a
company that works out of three offices in Gurgaon (combined capacity:
1,500 seats) servicing clients like Amazon.com.
|
RAMAN ROY, CEO
Spectramind
Call centres were
the great white hope in the turbulent 2000s. Raman Roy left GE's
call-centre ops to start Spectramind
|
Logic Of Success
Success at the higher end of the spectrum
isn't dependent on volumes, but it is a function of skills and technology.
That's why, says Srikant Shastri, the Secretary-General of the Call Centre
Association of India and the ceo of Solutions, a call centre focussed on
the domestic market (yes, it has global aspirations), ''it makes sense for
a software company to venture into the business than someone else without
the requisite technical expertise.''
For the MNC deciding to 'make' rather than
'buy', there's enough logic to invest in a fully-owned, or part-owned call
centre. It's easier to outsource a critical process to a division of the
company than a rank outsider and often, investments made by MNCs in call
centres in India end up being more lucrative than those made by them in
their main lines of business in the country. GE (which runs the largest
call centre operation in the country with 9,000 seats), American Express,
and British Airways have discovered this to their benefit. As has US
insurance major Conseco, which wholly owns the NOIDA-based EXL Services.
The larger companies are also better equipped to deal with attrition,
which industry-insiders put at around 40 per cent. ''The trick,'' says
Raman Roy, President and CEO, Spectramind, ''is to reduce attrition by
making the company a fun place to work.'' Roy also has the advantage of
heading a business that is focussed on the high-end business of knowledge
services.
Does it make sense to focus on the domestic
market at all? It does, but only if the company's objective is limited
either in terms of investment, or vision, or both. Ishita Swarup and Tina
Sapra run the Rs 3-crore Orion Dialog, a call centre operation catering
exclusively to the domestic market. While their returns aren't anywhere as
high as those of centres targeting customers in the US, they do service
clients like AirTel and Nokia, and make a reasonable go of it. As the
domestic market evolves, especially in areas like banking, insurance, and
financial services, the number of call centre seats devoted to the
domestic market (around 5,000 right now, according to the CCAI) could
increase.
It's unlikely that India loses out on its
country-advantages in the business anytime soon. In businesses like claims
processing and accounting, the country boasts a time-zone advantage that
suits the US, the main market for such services, fine. In other
information technology-enabled businesses, it enjoys a significant labour-cost
advantage. But as the business becomes more capital- and
technology-intensive, the Indian market for it-enabled services will
increasingly become a playground for the big boys.
|