CASE GAME
The Case Of Sales Promotion
Should VK Appliances continue with its
sales promos to ratchet revenues? Consultant A. Marfatia, M.G.
Parameswaran of FCB-Ulka, and V. Crishna of Godrej Appliances debate.
By R.
Chandrasekhar
Pretending
to check the side panel of a double-door frost-free refrigerator, Otto
D'Costa used the opportunity to check if his false french beard was still
in place. The CEO of VK Appliances was incognito: he was at a durables
showroom to check how his company's 15-day-old sales promotion campaign
was doing. D'Costa had chosen to visit the biggest dealer in Mumbai for
two reasons. One, this dealer got all kinds of customers from places as
far as Vashi and, two, his product returns were low compared to the
industry average. And that intrigued D'Costa. He wanted to know why he
sold better than VK's other dealers.
In the 40 minutes that D'Costa had already
spent at the showroom, he was getting mixed signals from observing
customers. But he knew that a clearer picture would emerge once the army
of 'ghost' customers unleashed by the company last week returned to the
headquarters with its findings. For now, though, one thing seemed clear.
The dealer's salesman was the biggest influencing factor on purchase
decision. Even if a customer walked in with pre-conceived notions about a
particular brand, the salesman almost always managed to sell the customer
what he thought was the best option given the customer's budget and need.
Surprisingly enough, the customer invariably seemed happy delegating the
decision-making to the salesman. ''Promotional incentives,'' D'Costa said
to himself, ''seem to figure low on the list of priorities of a
customer.''
The Pros And
Cons Of Promotion |
THE
REWARDS
»
Moves products in the marketplace
»
Helps induce first-time customers
»
Strengthens relations with dealers
»
Enhances excitement at retail end
THE RISKS
»
Adversely impacts
brand equity
»
Adds to costs and
reduces margins
»
Diminishes brand
loyalty among customers
»
Customers begin
to expect sops |
As he got into his car, D'Costa wondered
whether VK's promo schemes for its range of durables-washing machines,
air-conditioners, refrigerators, and CTVs-were worth it after all. Heading
for a luncheon appointment with Ravi Pandey, the head of the ad agency
that was handling the VK account, D'Costa called his Vice President
(Marketing) Mohan Dubey on his mobile and asked him to join them at the
Oberoi Palms.
''I had reservations about the promos even
before launch,'' said D'Costa, as they settled down with starters. ''But I
allowed myself to be overruled by you. I have just spent almost an hour at
a showroom and I am convinced that the best way to attract customers is to
strengthen the hands of the dealer and enhance our brand equity.''
''So, what's new?'' asked Pandey. ''It is the
season of the year when we keep having these debates.''
''Yes, for sure,'' said D'Costa. ''But you
can't deny that a promo is in the nature of a knee-jerk reaction. The
shoppers are not in a mood to buy, or sales are flagging? Give a freebie.
And the goods begin to move. It works. But, the point is: at what cost? A
promo, in my view, is like administering a steroid. It peps up the
structure, but weakens the system in the long run. But what is it doing to
the brand equity of VK? Are we creating brand value? Is there a long-term
perspective in what we have done? Are we ensuring that a customer buys VK
without a bait next time round?''
''We are not the only one to have taken the
promo route,'' said Dubey. ''Nor is this the first time. Remember what
happened last year? Six of our competitors also went in for promos. Four
of them offered a straight price-reduction of between 15 and 20 per cent
for the festival season. The other two ran a raffle for the period with
the lure of an all-expenses paid trip to an overseas destination for the
winner drawn from lots. The schemes, as we know, bombed. Their sales went
up by only one or two percentage points and they were stuck in
single-digit growth rates. The consumer saw them for what it was: a
gimmick. Everyone thought that they were clearing up unsold stocks. But
VK's was different.''
''Tell me,'' asked D'Costa, ''how was it
different?''
''In two ways,'' said Dubey. ''Take our
washing machines. We gave away a four piece set of non-stick cookware
(costing Rs 1,200) free with every purchase of our low-end washing machine
(costing between Rs 5,500 and Rs 8,000). First, there was product synergy.
Washing machines and cookware offer several common consumer benefits:
functional utility, operational safety, and ease of maintenance. The
target customer is common: a housewife belonging to the median income
household. Second, the scheme was cost-effective. KitchenAid, which owns
the cookware brand, billed the dealer only Rs 720-amounting to 60 per cent
of the price-while under writing the remaining Rs 480. The dealer
recovered 80 per cent of the bill-amounting to Rs 576-from VK, while the
balance was adjusted through reducing his commission from VK to the extent
of Rs 144. KitchenAid made up the unit loss by volume sales. The dealer
made up his cut in the margin on VK through increased turnover. VK spent
Rs 1 crore towards direct reimbursement to the dealers on KitchenAid
account and another Rs 50 lakh towards promotional costs.''
''My point is that the expenditure towards
the promo was diverted from our budgeted ad spend of Rs 1.75 crore for
washing machines,'' pointed out D'Costa. ''We spent 86 per cent of the
budget on a promo, which yielded quick results all right. After all, our
washing machine sales grew by 14 per cent compared to the industry average
of 8 per cent. But, unlike an ongoing advertising campaign, it is unlikely
to impact on the sales of later years. The spin-off would have been
possible only if we had gone in for a regular brand promotion through
advertising.''
''I think we should look at it in relation to
what we sought to gain from the promo,'' said Pandey. ''The main objective
was to prop up sales in a sluggish market. There were other related
objectives: induce the first-time customer to buy; get the retailers on
our side; accelerate stock movements from dealer shelves; break out of the
clutter through a value-added product offering; and hold on to our
marketshare. We managed to achieve all of these objectives.''
''Pandey spoke of cost-effectiveness,'' said
Dubey. ''There is another issue here: the cost of carrying inventories. It
is better to offer a discount of 20 per cent-in whatever form-and move the
tonnage than incur a 3 per cent interest cost per month, which works out
to 18 per cent for a six-month season.''
''I am somehow not convinced,'' said D'Costa.
''I don't see the big picture. A promo has a habit of self-perpetuation.
And I think that's bad for our brand.''
CASE
SOLUTIONS
Send us your solution
|