|
The MNC Retreat
In 1998,
when the prime minister announced that companies listed in India could now
buy their shares back from shareholders, the stockmarkets rejoiced. With
good reason. For corporate India, here was a chance to build up the
barriers to protect itself from tomorrow's raiders as well as an
opportunity to prop up their depressed share values. However, what the
wise men who put together the buyback package never anticipated was that
it would be used by multinational corporations as a route to exit the
Indian stock markets. Over the past few months, a host of MNCs have
announced plans to boost their holding in their Indian operations by
buying back their shares from Indian shareholders. The worry is that many
of these companies, enticed by the low valuations of their stock, are
going in for a 100 per cent buyback, thereby paving the way for a
delisting from the Indian bourses. For local investors, who aren't exactly
being spoiled for choice with investment options, this isn't the best
piece of news. True, they stand to make some good profits in the short
term, given the apparent premium with which many of these companies are
trying to seduce investors, but the worry for those who opt for the
buyback is: are there enough opportunities in the market in which to
deploy that cash?
It's not just minority shareholders who
should be worried. The swadeshi lobby too has begun re-emerging from the
given-up-for-dead Bombay Club woodwork. And this time the domestic
industry has a point. Global majors are allowed into the country as
fully-owned subsidiaries, they begin making cola or chips or cornflakes,
gradually pile up the marketshare-and also the losses. The losses are, of
course, the proverbial drop in an ocean in the perspective of the MNCs'
global operations, but what they're gaining in the process is valuable
marketshare at the cost of domestic players. The objective, more than
making money, is to simply kill domestic competition. This may all sound
suspiciously like protectionist propaganda, but fact is that if a company
is under no pressure to worry about the bottomline-since it doesn't have
to worry about shareholder activism-buying up marketshare becomes so much
easier.
That's where shareholder accountability comes
into play. If a company has to listen to shareholders overseas, there's
little reason why it shouldn't in India too. If creating shareholder value
is the stated objective globally, the same goal should be pursued in India
too. And one needs to look no further than Hindustan Lever to justify
those statements. HLL strives for growth in a flat market. It continues to
be a significant contributor to Unilever's profits, and Indian
shareholders are in the process duly rewarded. HLL is a classic example of
an MNC that's bottomline as well as market share-focused.
Rather than allowing unbridled buybacks and
100 per cent FDI, it's time for the government to take another track.
Every multinational that comes into India should be asked to offload 20-25
per cent of its holding to the public in a stipulated timeframe-perhaps
three-to-five years. This may appear restrictive, and disastrous for a
country that's anyway starved of foreign investment. The danger of 100 per
cent owned multinational subsidiaries-not just for Indian industry, but
more for Indian minority shareholders-far outweighs that fear.
|