|
BEST CITIES FOR BUSINESS
In Search Of Rainbow City
What makes one city buzz with life while
another falls into decay? That each of our cities seems to have a mind of
its own may well have something to do with it.
By R.
Sukumar
|
MUMBAI: the
city of a thousand dreams |
Cities, like
organisations, live. They are born, they grow, they fall ill, and if left
untreated, they die. Each boasts a portfolio of smells, tastes, and sights
all its own. Delhi has its ruins, the pungent whiff of diesel mixed with a
thousand other emanations, and roads so imposing you'll see none like them
anywhere else in India. Chennai has the longest beach in the country, the
smell of kippers (called karuvadu in the local lingo) and the two polluted
waterways that run through it, the Cooum River (ha!) and the Buckingham
Canal, and the closest India can get to New York's El, India's own
elevated Mass Rapid Transit System. And Bangalore has its rain trees, a
hundred darshinis that open their days at seven every morning and serve
the best steamed dumplings (idlis, they're called) money can buy, and
arguably, more laptops per square feet than any other Indian city.
Each city also has a character, a buzz, a
thing-in-the-air that isn't just visible to those given to imbibing
vegetable alkaloids, or are simply born extra-prescient. A colleague
speaks of how years in Mumbai have endowed him with the ability to walk
past the stock exchange building and tell, from that thingamajig in the
air, whether the market is up or down. That may take some doing (and lots
of years of living in the city), but try a simpler ritual. Pick a clear
day in Mumbai, factor out the hustle and bustle of warm bodies going
someplace else, and listen. The sound you hear is that of money. In Delhi,
it is power; in Bangalore, enterprise; and in Chennai, industry of an
extremely self-effacing strain.
Not all cities are born with a character.
Most acquire them over time from their residents. And, in return, they
lavish it on those to come. Bangalore wasn't always a hot-bed of
entrepreneurial activity: it was a sleepy town, with a smattering of
industries, great weather, no pubs, and an indigenous population that was
predominantly Kannadiga or Tamil. Then, sometime in the 1980s the city
discovered infotech, and everything-the large number of engineering
colleges, the research-oriented public sector units, the great
weather-fell into place.
It is this aspect of cities-the fact that
they are alive-that thwarts the designs of city planners. Brasilia was
designed by the followers of Le Corbusier in his image of La Ville
Radiuese (The Radiant City), and instead of growing into a planned wonder
with spacious sidewalks, huge buildings, and well-defined residential and
business zones, the city degenerated into a place in the middle of nowhere
where no one wanted to live. Soon, it was surrounded by sprawling squatter
towns, and the city of the future, as it was publicly proclaimed while it
was being built between 1957 and 1960, became no different from other
urban infestations. Today, Brasilia is probably the world's largest urban
slum.
The interaction between a city and its
residents, with each taking on the characteristics of the other,
introduces an element of variability into the best laid city-plans. And
cities grow around their planned designs, like Brasilia did, or simply
break out of them, as Chandigarh, a city designed by Corbusier himself, is
now doing. In the true democratic tradition of humanity, cities have minds
of their own.
|