|
Ranjit Sahani, VC and MD, Novartis India:
Is eager to tap into the parent's pipeline |
Talk
to pharma analysts, and they will tell you that what excites them
is not multinational pharma companies, but the home-grown challengers.
After all, these are the companies spreading their wings elsewhere
abroad, fighting and winning fierce battles in the generics markets,
and raking in tidy profits in the process. It is not surprising,
then, that the market cap of the top three pharma MNCs is just a
quarter of the top three Indian companies-Ranbaxy, Dr Reddy's Labs,
and Cipla-combined. The MNC rivals, in contrast, have had to focus
on the lacklustre domestic market, and make do with minimum support
from their colossus of parents. Expect that scenario to change soon.
Starting January 1, 2005, India will bid goodbye
to its system of process patents that has held sway over the last
25 years, and say hello to a brand new, and vastly more competitive,
product patents regime. The switchover has grave implications for
Indian companies. Until now, Indian drug makers have launched products
by "reverse engineering" popular and patented drugs (i.e.,
by finding a slightly different way to make the same drug). But
under the new regime, the patent will be to the product and, therefore,
Indian companies will be unable to produce the same drug, never
mind that the process of making it is different. Their new launches
will have to be either their own drug or a drug that no longer enjoys
patent protection.
Getting Into Shape
That implies a big opportunity for pharma MNCs
who, having sat on the sidelines over the years, will race to make
up. As of now, the $4 billion (Rs 18,000 crore) pharmaceutical market
is dominated by generics, a large number of which are copies of
the original molecule. Often, as many as seven companies produce
variations of the same drug. In the last couple of years, a number
of Indian firms, fearing that they may not have access to these
products post-2005, rushed to get a toehold in as many products
as possible. As a result, the number of launches in 2003 was a whopping
1903, compared to 563 a decade ago.
WHAT PRODUCT PATENT IMPLIES |
» Companies
cannot reverse engineer (read: copy) drugs patented after January
1, 1995. It suddenly shrinks their universe of opportunities.
» Products
for which patent was applied for prior to January 1, 1995
can be reverse engineered. But this already is a low-margin
business with a number of players in the fray.
» The
market for patented drugs could soar to $3 billion, or 20
per cent of the projected market by 2015, according to a McKinsey
estimate.
|
With product patent in place, the pace of launches
by Indian companies will likely slow, and those of MNC rivals will
accelerate. Says Ranjit Sahani, Vice Chairman and Managing Director,
Novartis India: "Novartis like other MNCs will launch its latest
discovery products, given the changing environment." But don't
expect a flood of new drugs. For one, pricing will continue to be
an issue. Prices of key drugs are controlled in the country, and
those that are not, won't be able to sell at international prices-at
least not in the mass market. McKinsey & Co., however, estimates
that by 2015, one out of every five dollars spent on medicines will
be for the patented variety, and fetch $3 billion (Rs 13,500 crore),
which is two-thirds the current market size. Says Kal Sundaram,
Managing Director, GSK Pharma: "It's going to be a transition
phase for the next four to five years, and one has to gear up and
prepare to face the real patent protected market that we'll see
from 2007."
In the transition phase, MNC players like GSK
will move on several fronts, ranging from product launches and marketing
to research and manufacture tie ups. On the products front, the
initial years will likely be devoted to pruning the portfolio. After
2008, when the patent protected products start entering the market,
GSK may consider dropping drugs that are mature and not a part of
its core therapeutic segments. Bangalore-based Astra-Zeneca is reported
to have already trimmed its portoflio down to 14 patented products
from 35 earlier. Pfizer India plans to simultaneously launch in
India drugs put out by its parent in the US. "We are waiting
for the right signals to come," says Kewal Handa, Executive
Director, Finance, of Pfizer. Till that comes, it will focus on
launching products outside patent protection.
SPRUCING UP THEIR ACT
How the top pharma MNCs are preparing for
life after product patent. |
GSK Pharma: Entering
more chronic disease areas like diabetes, cardio-vascular
and CNS (central nervous system), and growing power brands.
Plans to launch the first patented product in 2007-08.
Pfizer India: Planning
to focus on 12 products from existing portfolio. Looking at
aligning with Pfizer, which has a pipeline of products, and
simultaneous launch of patented drugs globally-meaning India.
Novartis India: Has
made a beginning with contract research with Dr Reddy's Labs
for diabetes molecule and one with Torrent for age breaker,
a novel drug for dealing with metabolic disorders relating
to hypertension and cardiovascular illnesses. Has created
manufacturing capacities for group sourcing in generics business.
Ely Lilly India: Looking
at India as centre for R&D and contract research. Also plans
to beef up product portfolio in the months to comes.
|
The dawn of product patent will demand newer
skills of the pharma MNCs. Most of them do not have a field force
comparable to, say, that of Ranbaxy, Dr Reddy's or even Cipla. Why
is the presence of a big sales force important? "In India,
the name of the game is reach," explains Sameer Narayan, an
analyst at Enam Securities. "It's important to have a good
communication line with doctors and patients." Besides, in
the last 10 years, the market for drugs related to chronic diseases
such as diabetes, treating which requires a longer and more intensive
doctor-patient interaction, has grown at 31 per cent per annum compared
to the overall market growth of about 9 per cent.
It's this last mile that pharma MNCs now want
to strengthen. GSK's strategic five-year plan, for instance, aims
to "upskill" its sales and marketing teams using global
models. Pfizer has set up a core team to study post-2005 issues,
including sales and marketing. Besides beefing up their own marketing
machines, these companies will almost certainly strike co-marketing
partnerships with big players abroad. Agrees Anupama Arora of ICRA:
"Some of them may in-licence products from players who do not
have a presence in India and offer comprehensive therapeutic coverage
besides entering into co-marketing arrangements." A revenue
sharing arrangement will ensure that it's worth the while of both
the players.
The Outsourcing Opportunity
It's not the domestic market alone that excites
pharma MNCs. They see equally big opportunities in outsourcing research,
clinical trials, and manufacturing. Novartis has two projects underway
in the country, one at Dr Reddy's for a diabetes molecule and the
other at Torrent Pharma for an age-breaker, a novel drug for dealing
with metabolic disorders relating to hypertension and cardiovascular
illnesses. Novartis has created manufacturing capacities for group
sourcing in the generics business under Sandoz, where the company
has a healthcare development centre for generics. Pfizer India has
been a pioneer in clinical research having begun its clinical research
operations way back in 1995-96. GSK, which considers clinical research
as a crucial, scientific, regulatory and pre-launch medical marketing
tool, plans to use it to get blockbuster drugs to India in competition
with other countries. Eli Lilly is sourcing bulk drugs such as Nizatidine
and Methohexital for its global requirements from Shasun Chemicals
& Drugs, which is also working seven other molecules for Lilly's
industrial production process. But data exclusivity is still an
area of concern for those outsourcing research to India.
|
Kal Sundaram, MD, GSK Pharma: Plans to
launch new drugs starting 2007 and in the interim beef up marketing |
Nevertheless, in each of these areas, therapeutic
diversity, quality of trained investigators, computing infrastructure
and cost are a big edge. For example, in the US, it takes about
a billion dollars to bring a drug to market, with most of the time
and money getting spent on the four phases of clinical trials. Done
in India, the cost of the entire process can be reduced by half.
There are several issues that pharma MNCs need
to grapple with before they start profiting from their new products.
Cost is one big stumbling-block. To recover the cost of research
and development, new drugs are usually priced sky-high. For example,
Viagra sells for $8 a pop-a price unaffordable to most Indian patients.
Says D.G. Shah, CEO, Vision Consulting: "The biggest problem
for pharma MNCs is going to be that they can't sell in India at
international prices and at Indian prices, given the size of the
market, the new drugs won't be viable for them."
The ones that do decide to bring in patented
drugs at international prices will have to sacrifice volumes. (That,
however, does not mean they will not make money on those drugs.)
More worryingly for them, such launches must be preceded by a legal
infrastructure to ensure that product patent rights are not infringed
upon. Says Handa of Pfizer: "Major issues like compulsory licensing
and issue of remuneration of the patentee need to be resolved in
the Patents (Amendments) Bill 2003, which has the prime objective
of confirming to trips obligations under WTO."
But even the most pessimistic pharma mnc will
agree that India 2005 and beyond promises to be their best time
yet.
-additional reporting by Swati
Prasad
|