|
"The best of SMEs get
credit at interest rates which are at least around 175-200
basis points higher than those of blue chip large corporates"
J.S. Gujral (left), Director, and Sanjiv Narayan,
MD/ SGS Tekniks |
A
petrochemical engineer by education and entrepreneur by choice,
Nagesh Basarkar, 33, is a happy man. Core Energy Systems Pvt.
Ltd, an enterprise set up by him in 1999 with a capital of Rs
40 lakh, is growing and growing fast. In less than six months
of 2006-07, it has clocked Rs 10 crore in revenues. The tiny enterprise's
journey has been well worth the trouble. But once in a while,
Basarkar still gets to sample the constraints that bind a small
business. In January this year, for instance, four banks-including
private and public sector banks-turned down his request for a
loan. Core, which provides turnkey solutions for capital equipment
projects, had won an order worth Rs 6.2 crore from one of the
top government-backed research organisations. With impeccable
execution credentials, Basarkar felt the new order would be his
ticket to realising his dreams: A turnover of Rs 100 crore by
2010.
What was the problem? A hefty collateral
as a pre-requisite for the loan. And the collateral size? The
usual 20 per cent of the order-or a whopping Rs 1.24 crore in
Core's case. "At the rate we were growing, no way could we
have put up so much money," says Basarkar. Core has doubled
its turnover in 2005-06 to Rs 4 crore. The inland letter of credit
from his client meant little for the bankers. A new generation
private banker told Basarkar that the nervousness stemmed from
the huge size of the order, given Core's puny turnover of Rs 2.2
crore. "They did not doubt my technical capabilities of delivering
on the project. The bankers probably expect small enterprises
to grow at only 20-25 per cent and no more," he says. Basarkar's
case, though representative of the chicken-and-egg situation that
most small and medium enterprise (SME) promoters get into, did
not end in the manner it usually does for most SMEs. He did manage
to find the funds.
Lucky him. A study of 32,000 SMEs and 2,500
large corporates by rating agency, crisil, shows that SMEs have
lower access to bank funding. SMEs have a significantly low median
gearing (that is, debt as a percentage of shareholders' equity)
of 0.34 times as against 0.73 times for the large corporates,
according to CRISIL. "The difference was even more evident
when promoter loans are considered quasi-equity," says D.
Thyagarajan, Director, CRISIL SME Ratings.
THE SME SEGMENTATION
Size plays an important role in
access to credit. |
Turnover/ Status
< Rs 50 lakh
Usually run by promoters themselves, has limited manpower
and understanding of market or needs of bankers. Lack of knowledge
and awareness predominates. Has little recourse to organised
finance. Most distressed.
Rs 1-5 crore
May be mostly linked to a medium-sized or large unit or
large suppliers. Only 35-40 per cent get adequate credit.
Rs 5-25 crore
Reasonably well established, has educated management, proper
business processes and organisational structure. Books are
in order. 85-90 per cent get finance without difficulty.
> Rs 25 crore
Having attained critical size, this segment provides most
comfort to organised channels of finance. This segment is
chased by banks and others for margins that they provide.
|
Insistence on collateral, personal guarantees
and other such credit enhancements spring from the historically
high non-performing assets in the SME sector. Heightening the
caution levels are the poor information flow about the sector
and its informal business practices. "Traditionally, such
companies have been very opaque about their disclosures to banks,"
says Vijay Chandok, General Manager, ICICI Bank.
Consequently, the higher risk perception
gets factored into the cost of funds and the time taken for disbursement.
Sometimes the due diligence by banks takes as long as three to
four months. "The best of SMEs get credit at interest rates
which are at least around 175-200 basis points higher than those
of blue chip large corporates," says Sanjiv Narayan of Gurgaon-based
SGS Tekniks, which manufactures industrial electronics at its
plants in Gurgaon and Baddi. Narayan points out that even aggressive
private sector and foreign banks are of no help. "They are
willing to lend but only at bigger ticket sizes," he says.
Other channels of organised finance, whether
it is private equity and venture firms or institutions such as
Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI), are constrained
by the same factors. According to SIDBI Chairman N. Balasubramanian,
the smaller units are the most distressed ones. He splits the
SME universe into four categories on the basis of turnover and
their access to finance (see The SME Segmentation). As the enterprises
increase in size and scale, they become more sophisticated in
their business processes. "The smallest category typically
has just one to two people running the enterprise, so there is
limited manpower and little understanding of funding requirements,"
he says. Manish Gupta, Managing Director of advisory firm IndusView
Advisors, agrees. "A lot of SMEs do not maintain good books,
and then there is the management structure-typically family-run
with no second rung in place," he says.
Kunwer Sachdev, a first generation entrepreneur
who heads Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd and now has Reliance Energy
India Power Fund and Temasek Holdings as private equity investors,
explains the start-up issues. "In the early stages, accounting
or finance-related issues are often the last priority for the
entrepreneur as he is focussed on just growth in sales. Private
equity investors or banks on the other hand need assurance of
safety of their investment." Moreover, in pursuit of their
goal of high returns, VCs have a preference for scalable ventures-untried
or untested ventures; or ventures which are highly technology
oriented, difficult to replicate or have entry barriers for others.
|
"At the rate we were
growing, no way could we have put up so much money (a collateral
of Rs 1.24 crore against a bank loan of Rs 6.2 crore)"
Nagesh Basarkar
CMD/Core Energy Systems |
The other big issue in India is that of reaching
out to this granular pool of SMEs stretching across multiple industries.
"Since it is a diffused set that is being targeted, accessing
SMEs in a cost-efficient manner is a difficult task," says
Gupta. With demand far outstripping supply, Balasubramanian readily
owns that "the needs of the smaller outfits could not be
addressed appropriately, even by SIDBI". SIDBI was formed
in 1990 as a development finance institution for the sector.
Slowing down progress is the fact that there
is no published or syndicated information available on Indian
SMEs, unlike some of the other developed nations. Left with limited
options for organised finance, SME promoters often rely on their
own sources of funding such as high cost credit card loans or
approach NBFCs or unorganised money lenders. Such funds come at
a premium and affect the firm's efficiencies and competitiveness.
And the SMEs continue in the vicious cycle of small size and inadequate
finance.
Government Push
Stunted SME growth costs the nation, since
small enterprises are what drive the economy. Aware that the small
sector contributes nearly 40 per cent to the industrial output
of the country and is the largest source of employment after agriculture,
the government is planning to put in place a comprehensive legislation
by October this year (see The Big Invisible on page 100). The
intent is to push for doubling the flow of credit to this sector
from Rs 67,000 crore in 2004-05 to Rs 1,35,000 crore by 2009-10.
Meanwhile, asymmetry of information is being
tackled on two fronts. Beginning May this year, Credit Information
Bureau (India) Ltd (CIBIL) has started compiling credit histories
of enterprises. It has begun with a database of 600,000, of which
nearly 95 per cent are SMEs. "The total targeted database
could be over 1 million," says CIBIL Chairman S. Santhanakrishnan.
|
"In the early stages,
finance-related issues are often the last priority for the
entrepreneur"
Kunwer Sachdev
CEO/Su-Kam Power Systems |
In the interim, banks are also becoming more
flexible in their assessment procedures. Bankers, as seen in Core
Energy's case, have traditionally looked at financial ratios and
have lent against the security of fixed assets. Now, however,
banks are formulating alternate strategies. For example, ICICI
Bank, which has chased SME clients quite aggressively, looks at
surrogates like supply chain linkages and cash flows to evaluate
the credit worthiness of the SME entities. It has also developed
a proprietary scorecard-based model to process credit information
faster. And the result is that the SME strategic business unit
contributes 11 per cent to the bank's total fee income. This points
to the inherent bankability of the sector as a whole.
Credit rating by independent agencies is yet
another way to fill information gaps. Last year, SIDBI teamed
up with Dun & Bradstreet and CIBIL to set up the SME Rating
Agency (SMERA). CRISIL too began its SME ratings business last
year with Su-Kam and has rated some 400 firms already. SMERA has
also tied up with 16 banks, 12 of which have linked their lending
terms to the rating obtained. "With a credit rating, 50 basis
points could be shaved off from the interest rates," says
SGS' Narayan.
However, it is early days yet and the concept
has yet to catch on. "SMEs often fear that since their financials
do not reflect the correct picture, they may not get a good rating
and the same could boomerang via reduced lending," says SMERA
CEO, Rajesh Dubey. But as the good stories get around, the rationale
for transparency will gain ground and it could well lead to a
significant change in the operating environment. "This would
reduce the turnaround time for SME loans, as well as promote risk-related
lending," says Santhanakrishnan of CIBIL. "Currently,
the good SMEs are cross-subsidising the bad ones with high rates
for all," he says.
More Solutions
|
"Traditionally, small
enterprises have been very opaque about their disclosures
to banks"
Vijay Chandok
General Manager/ICICI Bank |
Apart from legislation, other measures such
as Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Small Industries (CGTSI) and
the creation of the Indonext platform (a Bombay Stock Exchange-backed
market for raising debt and equity for small businesses) augur
well. Fiscal measures such as simplification of disclosure requirements
could also help. "The disclosure requirements and accounting
methodology for recognising income as applicable to large firms,
is neither desirable nor feasible," says SMERA's Dubey.
SIDBI's Balasubramanian believes that instead
of relying on government machinery alone, private sector potential
should be tapped in targeting the smaller-sized firms. "For
credit demands up to Rs 5 lakh or so, local experts need to be
encouraged. They could serve as the link between local entrepreneurs
and the banks and could mentor the entrepreneurs on quality, technology
and finance issues," he says.
SME-oriented venture funds such as SBIC (Small
Business Investment Company) programme of us Small Business Administration
can fill the gap in private equity for SMEs. But ultimately as
ICICI Bank's Chandok says, "Efficient business models would
attract capital at competitive rates and natural competition amongst
financiers will drive prices down. In such a context, the onus
of getting cheaper finance to a large extent rests with the SMEs
themselves."
The goods news: The more progressive small
entrepreneurs already get the message.
|