![](grfx/48.jpg) |
Ajay Singh: It's not out
there |
Air
Deccan's chief Operating Officer Warwick Brady is a colourful
man. He does not mince worlds and wears a bright yellow tee shirt
to work-every day. The recurring tee shirt is not a passing whim
or a statement of Brady's taste in clothing. Everybody who works
for Air Deccan, from the senior management to the booking agents,
will sport these fluorescent yellow tee shirts, which are part
of the company's latest branding campaign. A glance at the low-cost
pioneer's bottom line, though, makes you wonder whether red tee
shirts would have been more appropriate. After all, Deccan Aviation
(that's what the listed company is called) has blood dripping
all over its balance sheet, and piled up losses at last count
had hit Rs 341 crore in the 15-month period to June 2006.
To be fair, Air Deccan is not alone-red seems
to be dominant motif of the Indian aviation industry. Spice Jet,
a competitor in the low-cost space, has also run up losses, of
Rs 41.4 crore since inception. GoAir, another low-cost airline,
is also losing money (although Managing Director Jeh Wadia told
BT recently that break-even is round the corner). The pain, to
be sure, isn't restricted to just the low-cost fleet. Full-service
airlines like Jet Airways, Kingfisher Airlines and Air Sahara
are also reeling, with Jet notching up a Rs 45-crore loss in the
first quarter. "Even though it's tough to project the exact
amount of losses incurred by the Indian aviation industry as most
players are privately held, we estimate that the industry will
lose $350-400 million (Rs 1,610-1,840 crore) this year. And that's
an estimate on the conservative side," says Kapil Kaul, CEO,
Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation (CAPA), Indian subcontinent and
Middle East.
Less than 18 months ago, the scenario was
different. The buzzwords in the Indian aviation industry were
capacity expansion, aggressive pricing and, of course, market
penetration. To the credit of most airlines, they did most of
that. Ticket pricing was cut-throat and the market was penetrated
like never before (traffic growth rates of 50 per cent are unheard
of in aviation industry history).
So, what explains today's funeral mood-and
the morbid language of honchos? "It's airline suicide,"
grimaces Deccan's Brady. "If a passenger can pick up an airline
ticket for Rs 6,000 a month before the journey and a thousand
bucks a day before the journey, then you know that there is a
need for sanity." Brady was speaking at the third Annual
India and Middle East Low Cost Carrier (LCC) Symposium, organised
by CAPA. Brady did not stop there. "Right now, it's just
a downward spiral of low fares. Over the next two years, there
will be a couple of deaths along the way. We expect a bloodbath
in February, March when new players will come into the industry.
Back here (India), airlines have an appetite for losses and pain,"
he added even as delegates squirmed in their seats.
Brady was not alone. SpiceJet Director Ajay
Singh feels that the next couple of months could be very tough
for the industry. "All airlines are feeling the pain. However,
we think the threshold for pain has been reached or will be reached
soon," says Singh. "There is bound to be high volume
growth in the industry. But the challenge is to convert that into
growth of profit." Since April 2005, the Indian aviation
industry has added 95 aircraft and 40 more are expected to be
delivered in the next six months. Basically, in the last 18 months,
capacity has doubled. By 2007, India will have more than 300 aircraft
(see A Bulging Order Book). In addition, there are 10 operators
competing for passengers on almost the same routes. Says capa's
Kaul: "Most low-cost carriers are focussed on the Delhi and
Mumbai routes which are dominated by Jet, Indian and Sahara. Most
of the operators are concentrating on similar routes. There has
not been too much innovation by operators in route choices."
This has forced operators to slash prices to attract customers,
leading to predatory pricing practices. Full-cost carriers are
cutting prices to low-cost levels, and some airlines are selling
tickets far below the costs they incur.
Last fortnight, a group of airline heads
met Civil Aviation minister Praful Patel, and appealed for regulation
of prices and restricting entry of new players. The minister,
for the time being, has said even though the entry of new players
will not be restricted, their applications will be "more
closely scrutinised". The minister has also been reported
saying that the losses of airlines could well be exaggerated.
Industry watchers also believe that this
is not the time for regulatory fine-tuning. "I have one word
of advice when it comes to preventing new airline entry-don't.
Government intervention, unless there is a very clear and transparent
framework, would very quickly undermine investor confidence,"
says CAPA's Executive Chairman Peter Harbison.
If such troubled times are prodding players
to unite, or to cartelise, perish the thought. As Air Deccan's
Brady quips, "Airlines are like street dogs right now. There
is no clique."
Very
Heavy Fuel
Fuel and salary costs eat into airlines
profits.
What's
been the biggest factor contributing to Deccan Aviation's humungous
loss of Rs 341 crore, on net sales of Rs 1,236.4 crore for the
15 months ended June 2006? An aggressive, arguably indiscriminate,
expansion programme? Perhaps. After all, Deccan added 20 new aircraft
on 56 new routes in the past 15 months-last fortnight for instance
the airline announced another flight into the North-East, to Lilabari
in upper Assam from Kolkata. But the biggest drag on Air Deccan's
bottom line has been clearly escalating fuel costs, which accounted
for a little over half (51 per cent) of sales for the period ended
June. That's Rs 625.5 crore spent on aviation turbine fuel alone!
Fuel and wages together accounted for 64 per cent of Deccan's
top line, as against 41 per cent in the previous year ended March
2006. For the April-June quarter, wages and fuel swallowed away
69 per cent of sales (for the quarter the net loss stands at Rs
110.26 crore on sales of Rs 398 crore). On a year-on-year basis,
the company's fuel and salary costs have jumped 333 per cent and
278 per cent, respectively. Since 2001, the burden of wages and
fuel charges to sales has been steadily burgeoning, from 13 per
cent in 2001 to 64 per cent in 2006.
Jet Airways too has been feeling the pain
on the wages and fuel fronts. For the year ended March 2006, these
costs shot up to just under 40 per cent from 33 per cent in the
previous year. It got worse in this year's first quarter-when
Jet notched up a Rs 45 crore loss-with fuel and wages eating into
almost half of sales (49 per cent).
-Mahesh Nayak
Yours, Mine(s) and Ours
Are steel makers crying wolf over iron ore
exports?
It
is a spat that is turning rather nasty. In one corner of the ring
is the Indian Steel Alliance (ISA), an association of five major
Indian steel producers-Steel Authority of India (sail), Essar
Steel, the Jindals, the Mittals of Ispat Industries and Rashtriya
Ispat (Vizag Steel). They are clamouring for an outright ban on
iron-ore exports and allotment of captive mines to steel producers.
In the other corner is the Federation of Indian Mineral Industries
(FIMI), a body of non-captive mine owners that has benefited greatly
from India's policy changes since 1997, which allows private sector
players to export ore.
ISA's charges are straightforward (see ISA
vs FIMI). Iron-ore is a scarce commodity, which should be limited
for the consumption of domestic steel producers. Steel production
means a 10-15 times value addition, greater taxes and higher forex
earnings. So, mines should be given only to steel mills for their
captive consumption.
A spokesperson for FIMI points out while
Indian steel production currently stands at around 41.3 million
tonnes (mt), the iron ore available is sufficient for more than
100 years, even if production more than doubled to 110 mt. "In
the next 100 years who knows what will come along to replace steel?
It is like arguing that mid-eastern countries should conserve
oil and gas and not export them. Countries trade in what they
have a surplus of," says the spokesperson. Pointing out that
the quantity of iron ore available has increased by around 15
per cent from 22,108 million tonnes in 2000 to 25,249 million
tonnes at present, FIMI says that this has been possible because
of fresh prospection and better extraction methods.
FIMI also says that existing captive mine
owners regularly sell their additional ore production in the domestic
market or even export it. "This demand for captive mines
is a colonial hangover. There is no shortage of iron ore for domestic
steel industry," claims FIMI.
Even as ISA and FIMI fight it out, the government
is said to be studying the situation and is yet to make its policy
clear. The demand from the Chinese, which some analysts say might
cool off, may determine the future shape of the industry and not
just the policy decisions.
-Venkatesha Babu
Down, But Not Out
Prices of commodities have eased, but the
bull run's intact.
It
is not just crude that has shaved off nearly a quarter of its
price over the last couple of weeks. The easing of prices spans
commodities ranging from energy, metals and agri-commodities.
Not too long ago, the runaway prices were
being explained as multi-year bull runs in commodities. So has
that rally petered out? Well, the current softening of prices
is a combination of many things. One of those is liquidity, a
glut of which triggered a frenzied rise in commodity prices. But
when money supply tightened sharply in the middle of the year,
the bull phase in commodities was the first to suffer. Heightened
concerns about whether the expected slowdown in us will deepen
into a full-blown recession also contributed to the bearish mood.
And as the cost of carry-the cost incurred from an investment
position-increased speculators unwound their positions. This is
especially so in case of the energy market, even as us hedge fund
Amaranth defaulted big time last fortnight. Easing geo-political
concerns coupled with a muted hurricane season in the US drove
down prices further. So, unsurprisingly, crude fell from a high
of nearly $80 a barrel to sub-$60 in roughly 5-6 weeks. According
to estimates, there was a $10-15 overlay of speculative and geo-political
concerns on fundamentally-driven crude prices.
Sentiment apart, other commodities such as
gold have also been witnessing what many commodity experts are
calling "the crude impact". In recent times, strong
cross-linkages of crude oil prices with other commodities have
emerged as crude prices are often taken as a proxy for inflation.
Hence, as crude dipped other commodities followed suit. This is
not to say that the bull run in commodities is over. Only the
hot money has gone away from it for the moment. "The long-term
trend line for a secular bull run is intact," says Unupom
Kausik, Head of Commodities, Anagram Comtrade.
-Shalini S. Dagar
|