|
MCD on the prowl: Illegal
buildings are symptomatic of the industry malaise |
If
you thought real estate was catching the high tide in terms of
fund flows, then think again. Were it not for a few snags, the
industry could be attracting far more capital. Topping the list
of impediments is the opaque nature of the business in India.
"The challenges of investing in Indian real estate relate
to transparency, limited market history and forecasting difficulties,
as well as title complexities and imperfections," says Kurt
Roeloffs, Head, RREEF Asia Pacific. Ownership records and land
titles are one of the biggest blind spots in property valuations.
Further, there is no title insurance in the country. Title insurance,
as the name suggests, guarantees against massive losses in case
of a faulty title. While domestic funds are able to negotiate
these issues, foreign funds too are learning to handle them.
One interesting fall-out of such intense
scrutiny by global and domestic funds is that transparency in
the market is increasing. According to a global transparency index
evolved by realty consultant, Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL), India
stood at #41 this year in a list comprising 56 countries-its rank
unchanged since 2004. On a scale of 1-5, with a score of 1 showing
highest transparency, India's transparency score was a low 3.46.
However, as India was among the top 10 countries (the 10th though)
in showing the largest improvements, it moved from "low transparency"
status to the band that includes "semi-transparent"
countries. A flood of major retailers and other MNCs looking to
capitalise on India's recent exceptional economic growth, plus
an increasing presence of international property consultancies,
have significantly improved the quality and availability of market
information across all sectors," the JLL report says.
As more transactions between foreign firms
and local developers get done, the general accounting and reporting
processes are expected to improve, since the local firms will
need to start matching global reporting benchmarks. The public
offers by real estate developers and the attendant disclosure
norms will also lead to more information about real estate assets
being released into the market. Similarly, the introduction of
real estate mutual funds will aid the process further.
The opaqueness is evident in customer sales
as well, where the rampant malpractices are significant enough
to inhibit demand. Issues such as cost of property related to
built-up, super built-up areas or carpet area have created a lot
of confusion in the market. Land use issues, as evidenced in the
sealing drive in Delhi, are pointers to an overall lack of urban
planning. Stamp duties and archaic laws such as Urban Land Ceiling
Act and Rent Control Act need to be rationalised or scrapped.
However, as with many other institutional reforms, much of the
initiative rests with the state governments.
Even as the government talks of a real estate
regulator, many in the industry are wondering what will be its
terms of reference. "Considering its importance in economic
growth, foreign direct investment and employment generation, it
is high time to have a federal regulator for the sector,"
says Cushman & Wakefield's Verma. Fortunately, he won't have
to wait for too long.
|