|
The 540 MW nuclear power plant
at Tarapore |
A
large 250-member delegation of us business executives landed in
Mumbai in the last week of November. Apart from the unusually
large size of the delegation, what was interesting was its composition-it
included representatives of about a dozen companies that are present
in the nuclear sector-like GE Energy, Thorium Power, BMX Technologies
(BMXT) and ConverDyn. The high-level us delegation met the domestic
industry to sniff at potential opportunities in the nuclear power
generation business that, on a conservative scale, will be worth
more than $9 billion (Rs 40,500 crore) over the next five years.
"We are excited about the opportunities as they unfold,"
says Ron Somers, President, Indo-US Chamber of Commerce, who was
here to herd the 25-strong nuclear industry team from the us.
Somers is not new to India or the power business-he headed the
controversial 1,000 mw Cogentrix fast track power project close
to a decade ago.
The visit was timely; the US legislature
is in the process of approving legal amendments that will lift
the three-decade long ban on sale of civilian nuclear equipment
and fuel to India. As India returns from nuclear exile, are there
others who will embrace it? How will the nuclear power business
play out? What do the global players have to say and how is the
domestic industry shaping up?
Interestingly, nuclear power industry in
the US has not added a single megawatt of power capacity over
the last quarter century on its home soil. "We have done
most of our business out of Japan but have ensured that we maintain
our technological edge over the last decade," says Andrew
White, CEO of GE Energy's nuclear business. For others, like the
$4-billion (Rs 18,000-crore) BMX Technologies, participation in
classified us nuclear programmes gives it the edge. "Participation
in military programmes has enabled us to hone our technical skills,"
says Craig Hansen, Vice President (Washington Operations), BMXT.
|
|
|
"Indian industry
has substantive resource capability in the specialty steel
manufacturing"
Craig Hansen
VP (Washington Operations), BMXT |
"The early rollout
of regulations is key to private sector participation"
Rajendra Srivastava
General Delegate, EDF |
"We are excited
about the opportunities as they unfold"
Ron Somers
President, Indo-US Chamber of Commerce |
Invitation to the Club
It has been a bootlegger's existence since
1975, when India first exploded a nuclear bomb and refused to
surrender its new found power. For, in the same year, a Nuclear
Supplier Group (NSG) was formed in London (hence, the name, London
Club) that shut the doors on India. Consequently, the fuel tap
for the power plants (3,900 mw costing around Rs 35,000 crore)
went dry and the country was left to the goodwill of nations like
China and Russia that had not then signed the treaty to keep these
plants running.
Now, the US is lifting the apartheid and
plans to allow its industry to sell civilian nuclear wares to
India as a first step. And, as a second step, it will lobby with
the 45-member London Club to allow laissez faire.
Now, the US industry is here in India to
net the first mover advantage. "We have met several companies,
including power developers like National Thermal Power Corporation.
We are looking for strong partners with credible track records,"
says Ganpat Mani, Senior Vice President, ConverDyn, which recycles
spent fuel.
Chinese Chequers |
It's nearly a
repeat of the oil story. China's appetite for nuclear power,
at 10,000 MW, has driven up uranium prices from $10 per pound
(Rs 480) in 2002 to around $62 (Rs 2,790) per pound now. Besides,
China is developing industrial manufacturing capability to
sell equipment at a later point of time. Uranium ore, per
se, constitutes less than 2 per cent of power tariff; so India
has little to fear on this count. On the equipment side, reliability
and track record may work against the Chinese. |
M&A Season Is On |
With the nuclear
power business gaining ground across the world, the equipment
industry has begun the consolidation process. Early this month,
General Electric Company and Hitachi formed a global alliance
to bid for equipment supply. Prior to that, electronics major
Toshiba Corporation bought out Westinghouse Electric Corporation's
nuclear business. All in aid of quenching the globe's power
thirst at the lowest price. |
The Power Of The Atom |
A truckload of
nuclear fuel can power a city like Nagpur for an entire year.
To do the same using coal-fired power will require as many
as 730 truckloads or two train loads of coal every day. In
short, 2 tonnes of nuclear fuel equals 2 million tonnes of
coal. Besides, power turbines last 60 years against 30 years
in the case of coal-fired plants and 15 in the case of gas
fired plants. On the operational side, however, nuclear stations
are as fragile as cotton. They "trip" at the slightest
provocation, like a disturbance in the grid. Since electricity
flows like water (by displacement), any unscheduled intervention
causes a ripple-enough for the nuke plant to trip. |
While US interest is on the rise, the pace
of business deals will be determined by another legislative move-one
that allows private ownership of nuclear plants in India. According
to industry officials, the entire process could take up to a year-and-a-half.
Consequently, domestic companies like Tata Power and Reliance
Energy are only exploring opportunities at this point in time.
Says GMR Senior Vice President Avinash Shah: "We are talking
to the global industry and exploring the possibilities of setting
up nuclear plants in the country."
Project developers are obviously upbeat about
the opportunities, but so are equipment makers like Larsen &
Toubro (L&T). This is endorsed by several us majors. Says
Hansen, whose company has already done business in the country
with Thermax: "The Indian industry has substantive resource
capabilities, especially in the specialty steel manufacturing
business." Adds Timothy L. Richards, Director, International
Energy Policy, GE Energy: "This visit has allowed us tech
companies to engage with prospective business partners and customers
here in India."
Nuke the Winner
The increasing popularity of nuclear power
globally can be partially attributed to the rising costs of alternate
fuels. Gas and coal prices have hardened like never before and
equipment costs have not eased. But unlike other power generation
fuels that hardly undergo any treatment before use, nuclear fuel
has to go through several stages of processing. Little wonder
then that the cost of raw material is a mere 10 per cent of the
total fuel cost. As much as 60 per cent of fuel cost goes towards
enriching the fuel and another 30 per cent is spent on fuel fabrication
(milled from uranium ore and rolled into pellets and rods that
find their way to the reactor). More importantly, fuel cost is
a mere 15 per cent of total tariff, even at the prevailing rates
of $62 (Rs 2,790) per pound (See Bang for your Buck). This is
a major asset in times of oil and gas price volatility.
But India has not been able to take advantage
of this due to the nuclear apartheid that it has been subjected
to over the last three decades. Result: the country's nuclear
energy capacity is 3,900 mw, a minuscule 3 per cent of its installed
power generation capacity. The government plans to add another
6,000 mw capacity over the next 10 years. There is, however, the
possibility that capacity additions by the private sector will
result in this figure being overshot. Says V. Raghuraman, Principal
Advisor, CII: "The government needs to quickly amend the
Atomic Energy Act, 1962, to hasten the pace of private participation
in the sector." Agrees Rajendra Srivastava, General Delegate,
EDF: "The early rollout of regulations is key to private
sector participation."
|
"We are
exploring the possibilties of setting up nuclear plants in
the country"
Avinash Shah
Senior Vice President, GMR |
Safety versus Economics
The scars of a nuclear accident leave a deep
imprint on society. A few years after India was barred from accessing
nuclear material, The Three Mile Island (a nuclear power plant)
accident in 1978 brought an end to the capacity addition programme
in the US.
The re-emergence of nuclear power as an acceptable
energy source has as much to do with the redressal of safety issues
as with the cost of abating carbon emissions. In a deposition
before the us Senate in September this year, Assistant Secretary
for Nuclear Energy, Dennis Spurgeon said: "Nuclear technology
is the only one currently available that is capable of delivering
large amounts of power without producing emissions. US nuclear
power plants displace millions of tonnes of carbon emissions each
year."
But the development of a vibrant nuclear
energy industry depends critically on not only addressing the
safety issues but also on clearly defining who picks up the tab
in case of an accident. "No private company will buy the
entire accident insurance for a nuclear plant. A sovereign cover
is essential depending on the plant capacity," says Omer
Brown II, Attorney, Harmon, Wilmot and Brown, LLP, a firm representing
several nuclear operators in the us. "The global practice
is that the country concerned provides an insurance cover of up
to $450 million (Rs 2,025 crore)." Will India blink on this
count? That remains to be seen, but it will add to power costs.
Interestingly, China offers an insurance of less than $50 million
(Rs 225 crore), industry officials point out.
The opportunity, clearly, is huge. The global
nuclear scenario, from India's perspective, is better than it
was anytime in the past. And private players, both Indian and
foreign, seem eager to move in. It's now up to the government
to deliver sensible regulations to unlock this potential.
-additional reporting by
Aman Malik
|