|
CORPORATE FRONT:
STRATEGY
Can Videocon Change Its Value
Perception?The
Dhoots' open offer to buy 2 per cent of VIL is an attempt to excite its depressed scrip
price.
By Nanda Majumdar
The Brothers Dhoot are
fattening their consumer electronics flagship, the Rs 1,724-crore Videocon International
Ltd (VIL), for the deal. Last fortnight, Venugopal Dhoot, 48, chairman of the Rs
3,000-crore Videocon Group, announced that the promoters have made an open offer to buy 2
per cent of VIL at Rs 140 per share. Given that the Dhoots are masters in the art of
street-smart business, this may be more than a cleverly-crafted stunt aimed at exciting
Videocon's lacklustre scrip. In the long run, it may also be a trailer to a sellout.
For, the Dhoots are comfortably entrenched in VIL,
controlling 35 per cent of its Rs 70-crore equity. Coupled with their associates' 7 per
cent stake, the promoters, effectively, hold a 42 per cent stake in VIL--a figure that
would deter any hostile predator. The public--with a 1.2-million shareholder base--holds
31 per cent of VIL's equity; Global Depository Receipt (GDR)-holders and foreign
institutional investors, another 17 per cent; and the financial institutions control the
remaining 10 per cent.
Venugopal Dhoot explains his reasons: "We are
consolidating our businesses, ensuring that our strengths are better-perceived, and
indicating our commitment to our company. There's no truth in the divestment theory."
But it is clear that the Dhoots needed to trigger off a change in the sentiment for VIL's
flailing scrip, which has shot up from Rs 62.45 on Announcement Day (April 9, 1998,) to Rs
77.90 on April 13, 1998. Contrast this with VIL's earlier scrip movement: it fell from Rs
110 in April, 1995, to Rs 60 in April, 1996. And the fall continued to Rs 30 a year later,
after which VIL slid to Rs 24 in February, 1998.
Says a Mumbai-based investment analyst: "The scrip is
grossly undervalued, largely due to the investor's lack of confidence in the group."
That obviously rankles, since its arch-rival, the Rs 2,600-crore BPL, has seen its scrip
soar over the last seven months to about Rs 170 in mid-April, 1998. Admits S.K. Shelgikar,
42, advisor, Videocon Group: "We believe that the current market price does not
reflect VIL's intrinsic value. This step enhances shareholder value and is good corporate
governance. There really is no hidden agenda."
Early last month, trading interest in VIL swung up sharply,
fuelled by the talk that its Japanese partner, the $11.06-billion Matsushita, was picking
up a 10 per stake in the company. Assuming that VIL feels threatened by a
potentially-hostile raider, why has it taken the creeping acquisition route? After all,
couldn't the Dhoots have made an open offer for 20 per cent of VIL's equity?
Unfortunately, this would entail an outgo of Rs 180 crore--a
big sum for a cash-strapped company afflicted by low margins. VIL's net profit margins
have continued to slide: from 7.75 per cent in 1995 to 5.36 per cent in 1996 and, finally,
to 4.80 per cent in 1997. Under no obvious threat, the Dhoots did not deem it fit to
trigger off the Securities & Exchange Board of India Takeover Code of 1994, which puts
a cap of 2 per cent on open market transactions if the promoters' shareholding is between
10 and 51 per cent.
Of course, by following the creeping acquisition route, the
Dhoots will rev up the cost of any acquisition attempt--friendly or hostile. Says
Shelgikar: "Our timing is right. The market mood is just beginning to change, and we
should drive it." This strategy is already delivering results: the Dhoots' 42 per
cent stake, worth Rs 67 crore in February, 1998, has already increased to Rs 187 crore.
And if the scrip goes up to, say, Rs 120 per share, the promoter's shareholding will be
worth Rs 320 crore. Moreover, Dhoot's expressed desire to buy a 2 per cent stake every
year--regulation and resources permitting--does give investors an exit option, and could,
perhaps, keep interest in the scrip alive.
This strategy would also increase realisations if the Dhoots
decide to sell out. Street-smart and aggressive they may be, but the Dhoots are also
pragmatists. Stiff rivalry and a lackadaisical market are eating into VIL's margins. In
fact, BT learns that the marketer is offering cash discounts of 4 per cent to its dealers,
a shift from the typical 30-day credit cycle. Moreover, the group's Rs 100-crore
diversifications into petroleum, power, construction, real estate, and leasing are yet to
generate any returns.
As far as the consumer electronics segment goes, Shelgikar
concedes that "fluidity in policy and market conditions does imply that we cannot
accurately plan beyond three to five years. However, we do have our long-term
vision." For one, the group is strengthening its capabilities upstream as a supplier.
On the other hand, taking the lead from global majors like Sony, Videocon has been
tomtomming the benefits of the communications-technology-entertainment convergence.
Considering that the group lords it over the value-for-money segment--a distinction that
has been severely challenged in recent times--such a strategy entails a significant change
in mindset.
A beginning has been made with Videocon Infochannels, which
has made a foray into the manufacturing and trading of infotech and high-end
electronics-related products. While the future depends on how the group can leverage its
relationship with its partners, like Toshiba, Matsushita, and Sansui, the road ahead will
not be smooth, both in terms of resources as well as technology.
On the other hand, the Videocon Group has a lot to offer.
Specifically, a 1,000-strong sales- force, 150 service-centres, and over 5,000 retail
outlets. VIL also had a 27 per cent share in the colour TV market in 1996-97, as per org
data. Assuming the Dhoots retain their manufacturing capabilities, VIL's brands and
distribution network would be attractive for many a transnational.
Despite the initial enthusiasm, the Dhoots' gamble could
backfire. After all, the benchmark--even if it is more than double the existing
price--remains artificial. Moreover, 14 lakh shares--out of 200-odd lakh shares--is a
minuscule figure. As a huge over-subscription is likely, the promoters' claim that the
small investor will be favoured through a pro-rata basis. Sure, but the unlucky multitudes
will still remain. For them, the only hope is that VIL's performance improves. Ultimately,
that is the minimum guarantee for investor confidence.
EXIT: THE
STRATEGIST |
He's a man of his word. Twenty years ago,
S.K. Shelgikar, then 23--and now the Videocon Group's chief financial strategist--took a
decision: two decades later he would walk away from it all to fulfil his moral obligations
to society in line with the Bhartrihari doctrine. Well, he's done it. Over the past few
months, Shelgikar has quietly withdrawn from an active role in the group, and now operates
solely in an advisory capacity. Shelgikar's
agenda over the next two years is philanthropic research. "For effective
co-habitation in a society which is fundamentally not equitable, the institution of
charity must be strengthened," he avers. How? Through the evolution of mechanisms and
instruments--including valuation systems--to develop the resource market for non-profit
organisations. Subsequently, he plans to work at the grassroots level .
Shelgikar will be sorely missed at Videocon. In 1978, while
visiting relatives in Aurangabad, Shelgikar--a chartered accountant--got into a debate on
tax revenues with the young Dhoot brothers. Impressed by his keenness, the Dhoots
continued to seek his counsel, initially on direct taxes, and later on indirect taxes. In
1985, when Videocon moved to Mumbai, Shelgikar joined as financial consultant. Behind his
detached simplicity, the Dhoots realised that Shelgikar was financially canny, a shrewd
strategist, and an unconventional thinker.
It didn't take long to harness him into an empowered,
all-encompassing strategic and, eventually, operational role. After handling tax and
revenue matters, Shelgikar grew to be the group's key strategic planner and policy-maker.
From liaising with banks and financial institutions, to crafting innovative investment
strategies, this maverick has done it all. For now, the non-profit sector is richer. |
|