PERSONAL FINANCE
SHANBHAG'S WONDERLAND
Mutual Distrust
Why ignorance about the mutual funds may not be
bliss.
By A
N Shanbhag
If there has been a
wholesale crisis of retail confidence in the mutual funds industry, it is only because of
the small investor's lack of comprehension of this investment option.
Although it is, partly, the mutual funds and, mainly, the
Government of India that are responsible for this confusion, I thought I should make one
more attempt to restore the confidence of you, the investor, in the mutual fund.
Let me, therefore. tell you three things the mutual fund is
-- and three things it isn't.
Three Things The Mutual Fund Isn't
A Mutual Fund Unit Is Not A Fixed Deposit With A Company.
Because of the launch of the close-ended schemes and the promise of minimum assured
returns by the mutual funds, the investor was led into believing that the mutual fund unit
is identical to a company fixed deposit. Sure, like fixed deposits, units have redemption
dates and assured returns, but they also boast of Section 80-L tax-concessions.
A Mutual Fund Unit Is Not An Equity Share In A Company.
Because the Securities & Exchange Board of India insists that a close-ended mutual
fund scheme must be listed on the stockmarket during its lock-in period of three years,
the investor equates a mutual fund unit with an equity share. And he gets confused when
units, because of the lack of floating stock, do not behave like shares, and, moreover,
trade at hefty discounts to their Net Asset Values (NAVs).
A Mutual Fund Unit Is Not An Initial Public Offering (IPO).
Because the mutual fund unit was novel, and listed on a stock exchange immediately after
its allotment, the investor equated it with an IPO. However, units did not behave like
IPOs, which quoted at premiums on the stock exchange after they listed. Moreover, the
unit's launch expenses of 6 per cent scared the investor since it took the NAV on
allotment to Rs 9.40.
Three Things The Mutual Fund Is
Essentially, the mutual fund is a trust; not a share, a
debenture, or a fixed deposit. Whatever profits it earns have to be distributed amongst
the unitholders in the mutual fund on an equitable basis. So, high profits, high
distribution; low profits, low distribution.
Equity-based schemes yield dream returns in a bull market,
but, in a bear market, they become a nightmare. Debt-based schemes yield more modest, but
more-or-less assured returns that are higher than those offered by the banks. And the
balanced schemes are both a little risky and a little safe.
By-passing the problems of the close-ended schemes, the
open-ended schemes have, virtually, become savings bank accounts with higher returns.
Especially when the difference between the sale and repurchase prices fall to a marginal
level, and the funds become no-load, both on entry as well as at exit.
Of course, what I like most about the mutual funds is the
concessional tax that is levied on the long-term capital gains from them.
All over the world, economists recognise the retail investor
as the artery supplying lifeblood to the heart of the economy: its stockmarkets. Unless he
returns to the stockmarkets -- on his own or, better still, through the mutual funds --
they will not rise on a sustained basis. And that is why the cobwebs about the mutual
funds must first be cleared.
It may take some more time but, eventually, the mutual fund
will prove to be the most plausible parking-place for your investible funds in this
country.
Remember: I said it here first. |