PERSONAL FINANCE: MUTUAL MONITOR
Tracker Funds
Index funds can give you wide exposure--at low costs.
By Dhirendra Kumar
Soon, the robot-schemes will be here.
Otherwise known as index fund schemes, they -- as their very name suggests -- hitch their
fortunes to those of a stockmarket index.
Not only does the portfolio of such a scheme consist of only
the stocks that make up an index, it is even weighted in exactly the same ratio.
Since index fund schemes mechanically track an index, instead
of choosing shares that may or may not outperform it, they simply buy all the shares in a
given index.
Thus, the performance of an index scheme will always mirror
that of the index, faring neither worse nor better than, on an average, the stockmarket.
That's why they are equated with robots, with the
fund-managers being described as black-box managers since they merely program a computer
to buy shares in proportion to an index as it changes.
You could discount the bit about novelty since the Unit Trust
of India manages the India Index Fund -- which mirrors the National Stock Exchange Index
(Nifty) -- but that is open only to the dollar investor.
Back home, at least four index funds are likely to be
launched in this financial year.
Already, JM Mutual Fund has announced its JM Index Fund,
which boasts of two variants: while Plan A will track the 30-share Bombay Stock Exchange
Sensitivity Index (BSE Sensex), Plan B will track the 50-share Nifty.
Investors who believe in the theory of efficient markets
favour index funds on the assumption that any attempt to beat the market is an exercise in
futility in the long run.
If you ask me, tracker funds are relevant in some
stockmarkets -- not all. My evidence suggests that the more mature the stockmarket, the
more difficult it is to add value to a portfolio.
That's because, in such markets, the information
fund-managers receive is the same as everybody else. So, unless he is taking big sectoral
or stock bets, any fund-manager will only underperform the index.
Our stockmarkets are fast gaining maturity, and beating the
market is, increasingly, becoming difficult. And they also seem to satisfy the other
pre-requisite for an index fund scheme: liquidity, since the stocks in the indices at
least are pretty liquid.
However, such a scheme will only work as long as everybody is
analysing all the companies listed in the stockmarket, which must also set fair prices for
scrips.
That's because an index fund scheme does not recognise the
performance of a company, but simply goes by its weightage in the index. If the weightage
of a scrip goes up in the index, the scheme will buy more of it to maintain parity -- and
vice-versa. For example, if X is heading for a disaster, all the active fund-managers in
the stockmarket will start selling it while the scheme will just keep buying it if it gets
new money. And if X does go bust, it will just write it out of its portfolio.
How efficient our stockmarkets really are is also rather
debatable.
Hopefully, with the recent emergence of a new breed of
professional fund-managers, the day of the index fund scheme may just have arrived in this
country. |