|
CORPORATE FRONT: STRATEGY
Does Amrutanjan Face A Painless
Future?This single-product company
must fight several headaches simultaneously.
By R Sridharan
Last year, when the Rs 52-crore Amrutanjan
wished the millions watching Doordarshan's New Year's Eve Special ''A Painless 1998,''
everyone chuckled at its implications for the sponsor.
Paradoxically, while the prescription hasn't worked for
viewers, it sure has for the Chennai-based Amrutanjan, which manufactures and markets the
country's oldest Over-The-Counter pain-relievers. For the first time in its 105-year
existence, the company's turnover, at Rs 51.83 crore, breached the Rs 50-crore mark in
1997-98. Better, its net margins went up dramatically: from 1.60 per cent in 1996-97 to
9.66 per cent in 1997-98.
Explains S. Radhakrishna, 65, the CEO of Amrutanjan: ''The
previous year, we had an excise-related problem, the prices of raw materials had shot up,
and there was widespread demoralisation in the company. That is now over.'' True. In
another sense, his troubles may just be beginning: the good news makes Amrutanjan more
attractive than ever to the predators who have been eyeing the low-profile company for
some time now.
Don't forget, in the 3-year period between 1994 and 1997-when
its net profits fell from Rs 93 lakh in 1993-94 to Rs 62 lakh in 1996-97-Radhakrishna
deftly parried several takeover bids from giants like the Rs 8,574.90-crore Hindustan
Lever and the Rs 426.94-crore Procter & Gamble India (P&G). Despite the promoter
family holding almost 50 per cent of Amrutanjan's equity, they had sniffed out chinks in
this seemingly-insurmountable citadel.
For one, Radhakrishna's brother, Nageswar Rao-who holds a 10
per cent stake-has pledged it privately, and wants to sell out. Secondly, his son and
heir-apparent, Sambhu Prasad, is, apparently, reluctant to join the family business, and
is pursuing a career in the US instead. And, finally, at the scrip price of Rs 77 per
share on the Madras Stock Exchange on August 3, 1998, the acquisition of the Rao family's
stake will cost a measly Rs 50 crore even if a premium of Rs 400 per share is paid to
them.
However, Radhakrishna rules out the possibility. ''Selling
out was never an option. Neither is it today.'' In which case, he faces another problem:
Amrutanjan is largely a single-product company. Agrees Bharat Patel, 53, the CEO of
P&G: ''Apart from Amrutanjan balm, none of its other products have a national
presence.'' Worse, the Amrutanjan balm is targeted at adults-unlike P&G's Vicks
Vaporub, which is aimed at children-and, thus, has a limited market, where it could soon
face competition from a potentially strong global brand, Elder Pharma's Tiger Balm.
So, although Amrutanjan has a lion's share of 70-75 per cent
in the Rs 90-crore pain-balms segment, it is losing out in the Rs 250-Rs 300-crore pains-
and cold-relieving products market. On the other hand, P&G has maintained its 38.70
per cent share of the market in the last 4 years. Not surprisingly, P. Easwaradas, 45,
Executive Vice-President, Amrutanjan, is trying to tackle the problems related to a
limited product portfolio. He explains: ''While Amrutanjan used to focus on
segment-leadership rather than category-leadership, we no longer do so.''
For instance, in September, 1997, the company launched Cold
Snap-a pain-relieving gel that directly competes with Vicks Vaporub-which has garnered an
8 per cent share of the Kerala market. Unfortunately, the other products launched by
Amrutanjan haven't done as well. For instance, its Agni revitaliser capsules, and
mentholated drops, like Tingle and Swas, have received only a tepid response so far.
Reasons Easwaradas: ''To be honest, the company hasn't pushed these brands the way it has
its other products.''
Perhaps it should. With the barbarians at the gates, boosting
marketshare-and profits-may just be the balm the Raos will need to assuage the headache of
another raid on Amrutanjan. |