|
PERSONAL FINANCE: INCOME FUNDS
The Thing
About MIPs
An MIP doesn't assure returns. But if you
can do without a monthly dividend or two, your average returns in the
long-run will be reasonable.
By
Roshni
Jayakar
Sun
F&C Monthly Income Plan has, as a result of the fall in both equity
and debt markets, seen nav fall from Rs 10.01 at the beginning of the
month to Rs 9.70 on July 25, 2000. As a result of this, we have been
unable to declare a dividend on the scheme for the month of July, 2000.
Extract from Sun F&C Asset Management CEO Nikhil Khattau's note
to investors.
The NAV of Templeton MIP declined by 0.08
paise and the NAV as on July 24, 2000, stands at Rs 10. Therefore, due to
lack of distributable profits, the fund will be unable to pay any dividend
for the month of July.
Extract from Templeton Asset Management CEO & Country Head Rajiv
Vij's note to investors.
The mail brought bad news in August.
Dear John type letters from two of the country's best-known funds
shattered the belief (prevalent among investors) that Monthly Income Plan
schemes (MIPs) were safe investments that promised assured returns. Till
the early August missives from Sun F&C and Templeton, they were: while
returns from income funds hovered in the 10.08 per cent region, those from
MIPs ranged around 14.09 per cent. Then, Templeton and Sun F&C went
and skipped monthly pay-outs and investors grew cold towards the entire
genre of MIPs. After all, if an MIP does not pay a monthly dividend,
conventional investment-logic states there is no reason to stay invested
in it. Conventional investment-logic sucks. An MIP doesn't assure returns;
and if you, dear investor, can do without a monthly dividend or two, your
average return over the year is certain to be respectable.
Why MIPs Missed Out in July
The reason for a dividend-less July lies in
the battering the two-monthly income schemes (and other schemes) received
at the hands of the debt and equity markets. Most MIPs invest up to 15 per
cent of the funds they manage in equity, and the rest in debt. ''The
equity portion,'' explains Milind Nandurkar, 32, Fund Manager, Sun
F&C, ''gives a better return in the medium term than a pure debt
scheme would.'' And the debt portion generates a steady return.
In July, 2000, though, the Reserve Bank of
India upped the Bank Rate by 1 per cent. The increase in interest rate was
unexpected and fund managers were caught with a debt portfolio with a
not-insignificant maturity profile (when fund managers expect a hike in
the market rate of interest, they try and substitute long-term debt with
short-term government securities so as to reduce the maturity profile of
the portfolio-getting the yield-curve to move down). This caused the
yield-curve to move up and reduced the value of the debt portfolios.
Nor were the equity markets kinder: the
Sensex dropped by close to 600 points in July, effectively wiping out, in
the case of MIPs, the return earned by the 85 per cent debt component. The
result of this double-whammy? The Net Asset Values (NAVs) of most MIPs
crashed. This, despite some of the funds in question, like Sun f&c
Asset Management, reducing their equity exposure and pro-actively pruning
the maturity profile of their debt portfolio. The end result of this D-W?
Sun F&C MIPs and Templeton Mutual Fund MIPs skipped pay-outs, and
Alliance Capital MIP slashed its from 10 paise a unit to 9 paise.
How to Live with MIPs
Yes, we know the Unit Trust of India's MIP
offers investors assured returns for a year. But the UTI doesn't fall
under the purview of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI);
all other funds do. Ergo, they have to adhere to the regulation of not
guaranteeing a certain quantum of returns. Indeed, the fine-print in most
offer documents for MIPs carry a disclaimer to that effect: ''The mutual
fund does not guarantee or assure a monthly or quarterly dividend. The
fund also does not assure investors that it will make monthly or quarterly
dividend distribution, though it has every intention of doing so. All
dividend distribution is subject to the investment performance of the
schemes.''
Are the UTI's MIPs better? Not really: while
the returns on other MIPs are between 10 per cent and 12 per cent, that on
the UTI's MIP 2000 (3rd scheme) is 9.75 per cent (assured for a year).
''Besides,'' says Nilesh Shah, 33, Fund Manager, Templeton Mutual Fund,
''with interest rates headed north, we could benefit from higher yields in
the debt market.'' If you invest in UTI's MIP, though, you won't.
Who Should Opt for MIPs
Monthly income plans are just right for
investors who are ready to stick it out for at least a year, and whose
cash flows won't be hit by a skipped pay-out or two. Consider the Alliance
Capital MIP. The scheme had declared a 2.5 per cent dividend in the first
month of its operation (October, 1999). This was followed by 1 per cent
every month, till July, 2000, except April, 2000, when it declared a
whopping dividend of 11 per cent. The annualised rate of return on the MIP
if one were to average out payments over the nine months of the scheme's
existence? 22 per cent.
If you decide to put your money in an MIP,
you should remember that all the MIPs invest some part of their funds in
debt. That means they fork out a 22 per cent tax on their income
distributed as dividend.
The smart choice is to opt for an MIP with a
growth option and a Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP). You could, for
instance, invest Rs 1 lakh in such a scheme and opt to receive Rs 1,000 a
month after a year. This quantum (Rs 1,000) is your systematic withdrawal
amount, and the number of units in your account (say 10,000 assuming an
offer-price of Rs 10) will come down by a number that is a function of the
SWA and the NAV of the unit on the redemption date.
Thus, if the NAV of the unit on the
redemption date is Rs 12, a total of 83 units (1,000/12) will be redeemed
that month. The exercise goes on till you exhaust your account (all 10,000
units are redeemed). And you pay a long-term capital gains tax of 10 per
cent on the units redeemed.
Last word? Stay with the MIPs; they are
certain to pay back in the long-term.
|