PERSONAL FINANCE 
      
      
      Hidden Treasure
      Are close-ended funds a good bet? Shilpa
      Nayak thinks so. 
       Everytime
      the stockmarkets fall investors re-start their quest for innovative
      investing avenues. They don't expect much from these, only that they
      should provide reasonable returns over a period of time. Until last year,
      mutual funds, investors agreed, were it. But today most people who
      invested in them (and especially in their 'growth' varieties) are unhappy.
      That's still a shade better than the way investors in sector-specific
      schemes feel, downright miserable. 
      Succour comes from the most-ignored sibling
      of the fund-family, close-ended funds. If investors are indifferent to
      them, it isn't without reason: the holding-period is inordinately high.
      Indeed, the only close-ended schemes investors showed even a modicum of
      interest in were equity-linked ones that came with significant
      tax-benefits. 
      
        
          | 
             THE
            CLOSE-ENDED OPPORTUNITY  | 
         
        
          The
            Stake: Well-diversified
            close-ended schemes of mutual funds are a good long-term bet. But
            investors have a limited choice: Morgan Stanley and Master Share. 
            The
            Risk: The net asset value (NAV) and price of the unit
            will go down with the market. And in case investors need to
            liquidate, it will have to be at a loss. 
            The Strategy: Buy periodically.
            Understand that only an investment till the redemption of the scheme
            will pay, not an investment with a specific time horizon.
            
              
                | 
                   THE
                  BIG TWO ON OFFER  | 
               
              
                | Scheme | 
                NAV
                  (Rs) | 
                Price
                  (Rs) | 
                Discount | 
               
              
                | UTI
                  Master Share | 
                10.34 | 
                7.65 | 
                35% | 
               
              
                | Morgan
                  Stanley GF | 
                9.44 | 
                6.50 | 
                40% | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
      Today, close-ended schemes with diversified
      portfolios are available cheap. These schemes are a good investment bet
      for investors with a three-year perspective (at the very least) and
      looking to invest in markets through mutual funds. The timing couldn't be
      more right: close-ended schemes listed on the stock exchanges currently
      trade at a huge discount to their net asset values (NAVs). Take Morgan
      Stanley Growth Fund for instance. Its quoted price per unit on BSE is Rs
      6.50, but the fund boasts a NAV of Rs 9.40 Some elementary arithmetic
      shows that the units are available at a 40 per cent discount. 
      An investor can buy fund-units from the
      market, hold them to maturity, and redeem them at par. The only problem is
      that there aren't too many close-ended schemes that are traded regularly
      on the bourses. The most frequently traded units belong to the close-ended
      funds of Morgan Stanley and UTI (Master Share), which are to be redeemed
      on January 2009 and October 2003, respectively. 
      Investors can't really go wrong if they pick
      well-diversified close-ended funds with redemptions at the end of three,
      five or more years. The logic? The performance of the schemes over next
      three to five years will be in line with that of the markets, which are
      expected to move up. Ergo, a redemption at par at the end of the tenure
      will result in attractive returns. And the current discount of 35-40 per
      cent is by far the highest these units have ever been available at. The
      caveat? Investors will benefit only if they hold the units to redemption. 
      Any attempt to liquidate the units before
      that will, as is obvious from what has already been said, result in a loss
      for investors. But if they're willing to hold on, there's no way they can
      end up on the losing side. Corny as it may sound if it's investor-nirvana
      you're looking for, it's worth waiting for redemption.
      |