I
have been in the profession of picking winning teams for over 32
years now, and, in the process, have had the opportunity to closely
observe, evaluate, and influence potential leaders at levels and
disciplines and across industries. I usually start a search with
research on the company, its competitors, the management culture,
the industry, and the key drivers of a particular business. This
is followed by a critical evaluation of a company's strategic situation,
which helps me define what to look for in terms of qualification,
experience, and skills.
The research, the mapping of candidates, and
behavioural and competency-based interviews are the main tools of
the science of executive search. However, I will attribute a large
part of my track record to what can best be described as the art
of executive search. When I look for a particular candidate, I rely
extensively on my creativity and judgement. I try to see if the
person will blend into the organisation and evaluate him to see
if he will be able to lead the company successfully. Last, but not
the least, I rely extensively on intuition.
Almost 20 years ago, I was seeking a managing
director for a reputed, but run-down paint company. I had the opportunity
of evaluating several well-qualified professionals from a host of
companies. My intuition led me to recommend a deputy general manager
from a fan factory. I prevailed upon the paint company's chairman
to hire this young man. The young man turned around the company
in the very first month of his successful stint.
Without science, the process of choosing leaders
will lack substance. But without art, it would be mundane. My recommendation
to managements is that they should be very clear about what they
seek and follow their instincts while choosing leaders.
|