| The best thing about what the capital's 
              power-circles now term the Jash-Yash portfolio switch is an accompanying 
              move: the Department of Company Affairs (DCA) now reports to the 
              Finance Minister. That means Jaswant Singh has it within his means 
              to bring about significant changes in the way companies are run 
              and reform the scam-tainted financial markets. If the DCA's recent 
              activism is any indication, it seems to have rediscovered its teeth 
              under a new master.   Powers, the DCA has plenty: it can 'search and seize'; under Section 
              209A of the Companies Act of 1956, the Registrar of Companies and 
              field officers of the department can inspect the books of accounts 
              and other records of companies; and it can audit auditors to ensure 
              that they do what is expected of them. Only, all these powers didn't 
              exactly help the DCA cover itself with glory in its efforts to detect 
              frauds and punish erring companies. In 2000-01, the department investigated 
              a mere 221 companies; over 580,000 fall under its jurisdiction. 
              And between April and December 2001, it embarked on no new investigation. 
              All that has changed under 
              Singh: the DCA was quick to get into the Xerox Modicorp mess (the 
              office automation major made improper payments in an effort to generate 
              sales) and has sought a clarification from Videsh Sanchar Nigam 
              Limited on its decision to invest Rs 1,200 crore into the loss-making 
              Tata Teleservices, money that is to come out of its reserves.   The minister has also asked the department to re-engineer its 
              internals using technology. ''This will link the various offices 
              of the roc (Registrar of Companies) and bring procedural simplicity 
              to filings, and make surveillance easier,'' says a senior DCA official. 
              There's more affirmative action in the pipeline: stronger regulations 
              for companies delisting from the exchanges to protect the interests 
              of minority shareholders; more stringent rules for co-operative 
              societies that have been at the centre of several controversies 
              in the past two years; and a regulation that could make it mandatory 
              for companies to change auditors every three (or five) years, an 
              effort to prevent the kind of accounting scams that seem endemic 
              in the US.  Providence has played an important role in giving the DCA its 
              new, mean image. The department came out with a report on its investigations 
              into companies associated with the 2001 stockmarket scam (and a 
              few assorted others) in the last week of June; the department was 
              moved from the purview of the Ministry of Law to the Ministry of 
              Finance on July 1. Some credit for the DCA's activism, then-especially 
              its much-publicised investigations into companies such as Satyam 
              Computer and Ranbaxy-should go to the former Minister of Law, Justice, 
              and Company Affairs, Arun Jaitely. Still, as a famous brewer once 
              said, "it doesn't matter who gets the credit as long as the 
              work gets done". And the DCA sure has enough to do. -Ashish Gupta 
     FARE 
              DEALAnd Icarus Fell
 Airlines find some takers for their lower-than-low 
              fares, but riders on the promotional tariffs dampen things some.
 
               
                |  |   
                | Sahara Airlines: Unlike the team it sponsors, 
                  the Sahara Group's airline business is flying high |   The airports should have looked like 
              New Delhi Railway station, Mumbai's Victoria Terminus, and Chennai's 
              Central Station do before long-distance trains pull out. After all, 
              aren't airfares on the Mumbai-Delhi route, (Rs 3,920) not far away 
              from what one would pay for a second class (air-conditioned) railway 
              ticket (Rs 1,775), and on the Delhi-Chennai route, Rs 3,293, as 
              compared to Rs 2,279 for a second class (air-conditioned) railway 
              ticket? Still, the airports don't look crowded, and it has been 
              almost a fortnight since the reduced fares came into effect (they 
              were announced over a month back).   So, has the gambit to improve the plane-load factor from a sluggish 
              55-60 per cent failed? Not quite, says Saroj Datta, Executive Director, 
              Jet Airways. ''We have received an encouraging response to our Everyone 
              Can Fly scheme; we have seen over a 75 per cent utilisation of the 
              seats we are making available across our system.''   Travel agents are singing a different tune. Sharukh Kapadia of 
              Mumbai-based Magnum Travels says riders like the fact that one has 
              to book 21 days in advance, and the heavy penalty on cancellations 
              have resulted in poor offtake. ''Call it a quirk, but Indians don't 
              like to book a month in advance,'' adds Gus Barretto of Mercury 
              Travels. If the two agents are right, it would mean the anticipated 
              shift from rail to air hasn't happened: most train passengers book 
              tickets a month in advance and should have no problems with the 
              21-day rider. The airlines themselves are keeping their fingers 
              crossed. The surprise package has been Sahara's Sixer in the Air, 
              six one-way tickets to any destination for Rs 25,000. With no riders, 
              gushes Barretto, Mercury has sold three times the number of tickets 
              in the April-July quarter as compared to last year. That says a 
              thing or two about riders. -Abir Pal 
   MONEY QUOTIENTPoor, Did You Say?
 A new study has private bankers drooling over 
              India's potential high net worth individuals.
  Did 
              you know that last year there were some 7.1 million people in this 
              world with net worth in excess of $1 million? Or that of these 1.73 
              million were in Asia-Pacific? Equally revealing should be the fact 
              that a bare 1 lakh of them are in India (40,000) and China-otherwise 
              home to a third of the world's population. If you thought these 
              numbers from the Cap Gemini E&Y/Merrill Lynch World Wealth Report 
              2002 would send the nascent private banking industry in India packing, 
              think again. Starry-eyed P-bankers are actually digging their heels 
              in.
  Here's why: while the high net worth individuals (HNWI) in India 
              make up a minuscule 0.004 per cent of the population, the economy 
              is still growing. If the number of HNWIs grew in tandem with the 
              economy to the benchmark level of 0.05 per cent to achieve developed 
              economy status, there would be-according to Asian Banker estimates-nearly 
              4.5 million HNWIs in India (China would still have more at 6.5 million).  Private banking in India is young, with most of the players having 
              launched their offerings less than two years ago. And, according 
              to PricewaterhouseCoopers, a majority of the wealth managers seem 
              to manage between 21 and 40 per cent of their client's wallet. But 
              in another three years, most private bankers expect more sophisticated 
              clients to put the industry on a new growth trajectory. -Roshni Jayakar |