|
Over the next 10 years, India needs to use
technology to solve its problems. It has to start working on
products and services for the Indian market |
I
left India in 1973. It is hard for me to say whether I would have
been successful had I stayed back. I believe one's career (and life)
is a series of accidents; that it is hard to predict how things
will turn out; and that it is even harder to predict how things
would have turned out. However, it is possible to look back and
see how things were in the past. In the 1970s the difference between
India and the US, in terms of technology, was vast. I graduated
in 1973 from Indian Institute of Technology, Madras-and I specialised
in computers and communication-but I never saw a computer till I
moved to Canada.
There are several things Indian that helped
me succeed. The work ethic inherent in India's culture provided
a solid foundation; its philosophical roots, a sense of balance.
There is also a big advantage to being an immigrant because new
opportunities can be created only when one changes something in
the system; it is sometimes easier to do that when you are an immigrant.
Then, there's thrift. In India, most of us grew up with few resources
and learnt to do with them. The ability to manage with little gives
one the leverage to explore new opportunities and take risks. The
pay-off is that if you win, you win big. Business in the US is,
and has always been, a meritocracy.
If you look at people like me who moved to
either the US or Canada in the 1970s, you'll find several similarities.
In the 1970s, we excelled in universities as graduate students.
In the 1980s, we made a name for ourselves in universities, as distinguished
researchers, and in industry, as technical leaders. In the early
1990s, we proved we could be technical managers, and by the end
of the decade we had arrived: Indians were accepted as managers
in sales, marketing, and business and general, as CEOs, as entrepreneurs,
and as founders of companies.
What I have listed is a broad trend and several
of us participated in it. It would have been very difficult to get
a similar trend going in India. That it isn't impossible has been
proved by the likes of Narayana Murthy. The result is that it is
now possible to build profitable global companies in India.
Today, there isn't very much of a technology
gap between India and the rest of the world. Advances in telecommunications
have created a global economy and we are rapidly getting to a point
where something has the same value anywhere in the world irrespective
of where the 'value' has been added.
Over the last 10 years, India's success in
software has proved that it can compete with the world's best in
the knowledge-based service sector. As is evident from hectic industrial
activity, this can be extended to call centres, business process
outsourcing outfits, financial services back offices, and biotech
research centres. India can continue to position itself as a low-cost
provider of highly-skilled knowledge-based services. This will create
huge opportunities for all kinds of business activity in India.
I see several great entrepreneurs and great companies coming out
of India in the next 10 years.
That won't be enough. Over the next 10 years,
India needs to use technology to solve its problems. It has to start
working on products and services for the Indian market. There's
an opportunity for India to become the world leader in applying
advanced technology to solve problems vital to the global economy;
management guru C.K. Prahalad calls this 'technology for the masses'.
The government, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and scientists
need to work together to harness this opportunity.
I am working on a theme along these lines.
I am the Chairman of a Bangalore-based company called Tejas Networks.
I am excited about the role this company can play in the rollout
of telecom networks across India over the next few years. Once it
has successfully established its presence in the Indian market,
it can cater to a global market. Around the time I left India, it
would have been difficult to visualise such a progression. Today,
it isn't just a dream; it is reality.
|