One
of the more popular questions in junior-level quizzes goes something
like this, "Where was the first-ever international cricket
test played and between whom?" The answer: the game was played
at the St. George's Cricket Club ground in the borough of Manhattan,
New York City, between the United States and Canada way back in
1844. For the record, Canada won the game by a margin of 23 runs.
At this point of time, it is unlikely, despite what Ashutosh Gowarikar
(of Lagaan fame) would have you believe, that cricket was played
on the Indian subcontinent, and Australia was little more than a
collection of prisons.
But while the game has gone from strength to
strength in most of the erstwhile British Empire, in the original
colonies of the us it has been consumed by a maelstrom of locally-developed
sports. But if Gary Hopkins has his way, cricket will be resurrected
in the us. A Briton with a cheery disposition, Hopkins, who is based
out of the north-eastern city of Philadelphia, is the chief executive
of Project USA, the International Cricket Council's (ICC's) effort
that was started six months ago to popularise cricket (again!) in
the us.
Last summer, the rest of the world got a taste
of this rebirth when the us cricket team, a motley crew of part-timers,
qualified for the ICC Champions Trophy when they managed to win
the ICC Six Nations Challenge that had been held in the UAE, a tournament
held to promote the spread of cricket in non-traditional cricketing
nations. Tied at the top with three wins, the US had managed to
win this tournament on the basis of run rate and they were just
0.0276 runs ahead of Scotland.
|
Having played a major role in transforming
soccer into a multi-million dollar industry in the United States,
Hopkins is now entrusted with the job of doing an encore for
cricket |
But when facing stiffer competition, namely
New Zealand and Australia, the Yanks wilted (by tremendous margins).
However, the game has managed to find some roots in the country,
egged on by a growing number of immigrants from the West Indies
and the subcontinent. Now, every weekend in summer, thousands of
cricket players all over the country make their way to makeshift
grounds-in some instances counties have been considerate enough
to earmark small grounds-to play the game.
And it is this that heartens Hopkins, because
he played a tremendous role in popularising football, or, as the
Americans would call it, soccer, in the land of the free. About
15 years ago, Hopkins was part of a group of executives that played
a crucial role in the development of soccer in the US, as a precursor
to the country's hosting of the 1994 World Cup. Some of the world's
top teams from Europe and Latin America were brought to play competitive
games in front of American audiences and this rubbed off on the
national team. From a sport that only used to attract crowds of
under 3,000 and measly sponsorship deals totalling less than $500,000
(Rs 2.2 crore), the us soccer team now plays to full stadia of 90,000
and generates several millions in revenue from sponsors. Today,
it is a regular in the final stages of the soccer World Cup, and
the women's team is regarded as one of the best in the world. It
has even spawned a professional league-Major League Soccer.
Again, the first step involves taking some
top-tier teams and bringing them stateside. Exhibition cricket has
been big in the US for some time, very often involving current and
some washed out cricket stars. But Hopkins' job is to labour to
put together the bare bones that will allow the us to host its first-ever
ICC-accredited tournament by September of this year, all envisaged
under the ICC's euphemistically named 'Project USA'. After all,
that is his brief, written originally by Jagmohan Dalmia, who was
then the ICC chief.
JUST HOW MUCH IS CRICKET WORTH? |
A major reason
the international Cricket Council is promoting the sport in
the us is the tremendous commercial potential of that nation.
But just how much is cricket worth?
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI)-supposedly
the richest cricket board in the world-is estimated to have
revenues of around Rs 220 crore per annum, say $50 million.
Endorsements by members of the Indian cricket team add approximately
Rs 60-70 crore ($15 million) per annum. Extrapolating this
figure, cricket players and organisations worldwide make around
$250 million (Rs 1,100 crore) annually. Let's assume (rational)
investors would value the company at 10-times' earnings, and
that would make global cricket worth $2.5 billion (Rs 11,000
crore) if it were a traded scrip as of today.
To compare:
World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE):
Market cap $855 million (Rs 3,762 crore)
Manchester United: Market
cap $1.3 billion (Rs 5,720 crore)
Formula One: Annual revenues
$2 billion (Rs 8,800 crore)+ endorsements
And the granddaddy of them all
National Football League (US):
Annual revenues $5 billion (Rs 22,000 crore)+endorsements
-Kushan Mitra
|
Hopkins' work involves accompanying Andy Atkinson,
ICC's pitch consultant, to select the ideal venue for the match.
Going by indications, the venue is likely to be in the Governator's
(Arnold Schwarzenegger's) backyard, under the glitzy lights of Los
Angeles, and will feature India, Pakistan and England. Given that
tinsel town, USA, is little more than a few hours' drive from the
Bay Area where thousands of desi techies work, full houses will
be more or less guaranteed. The emotional outbursts of a subcontinental
cricket clash in the us would make for 'must-see' TV and be a lot
more interesting than watching car chases.
And TV itself is gearing up to telecast, nay,
webcast even more cricket, given the huge appetite driven by the
nearly 1.8 million Indian-Americans (out of a total of 3 million
cricket audience) in the us. During the 2003 World Cup, the webcasting
of the matches was possibly one of the first examples of a commercially
successful deployment of this rather overhyped medium; the reason
being the large geographical spread of the audience across the country.
And one of the companies pioneering this method of delivery is aptly
named 'Willow TV' (cricket equipment is made from the wood of willow
trees). Another company is Setanta, which saw revenues and viewership
by South Asians in North America increase dramatically, exceeding
all estimates, when they started showing matches involving India.
But the growth of the sport in the US depends
on the success of the country itself. Cricket is felt by many to
be a dull, boring sport. However, with new formats like 'Twenty20'
cricket catching on in England and Australia, it might not be too
long before international cricket will find a permanent home back
where it all began. Who knows in a few years' time, American politicos
will be chasing votes not from soccer moms, but cricket moms.
|