|
Mumbai floods: Made insurers run for
cover |
GIC'S REINSURANCE UMBRELLA |
Coverage area
Risk Cover Limit
Catastrophic
Peril Cover
Rs 850
crore
Earthquake Peril Protection
Rs 750 crore
Marine Hull Cover
Rs 250 crore
Terrorism Pool
Rs 500 crore
War Exposure
Rs 400 crore
|
(Source: GIC 2004-05) |
That reinsurance
is a must for every insurance company was borne out during the
July 26 and 27 floods in Mumbai. The four state-owned non-life
(general) insurance firms have been hit with some Rs 2,400 crore
in claims. In the US, insurers transfer as much as 60 per cent
of their risks to reinsurers; in India, the corresponding figure
is around 4-5 per cent. General Insurance Corporation (GIC) of
India is the biggest reinsurer (a natural, given that its four
subsidiaries once enjoyed a monopoly over the non-life insurance
business in India) in the market. Foreign companies are allowed
to own a 26 per cent stake in their reinsurance ventures in India
(just as they can in life and non-life insurance ventures); however,
most reinsurance majors (think Swiss Re, Munich Re, and Lloyd's)
have been content to reinsure business in India out of their offices
in other parts of the world. And the Indian non-life firms have
not felt the need to reinsure their retail business (although
July 26 and 27 should make them rethink that). "We reinsure
more in the wholesale business whereas the retail business is
not reinsured that much," says Sandeep Bakhshi, MD, ICICI
Lombard. One reason for this is that risk retention levels in
India have traditionally been high (over 90 per cent of the premium
is retained). That can be seen as a sign of over-confidence. Or
it could be testament to the superior underwriting skills of Indian
general insurance firms.
Regulatory changes could help the cause of
reinsurance. Right now, any private sector insurance firm wishing
to reinsure business has to first approach GIC. "The first
right is always with GIC," says Shrirang Samant, MD, HDFC
Chubb. Although he adds that companies such as his have no problems
dealing with GIC or with foreign reinsurers operating out of India,
a change in this rule could see more activity on the reinsurance
front in India (the foreign reinsurers could get aggressive, for
instance). Even without that, 2006 could see some activity; most
reinsurance renewals are due in April of the year. There is also
a chance that reinsurance rates could move North in areas such
as household and motor policies.
|