When
dealing with an issue as contentious as reservations, it makes
sense to begin with the context and the caveats: first, this magazine,
a die-hard proponent of free-market philosophy, has always been
partial to the merit thing. Second, the timing of Union HRD Minister
Arjun Singh's announcement/interview/response about an additional
27.5/whatever per cent reservation for Other Backward Classes
(OBCs) in Central universities was deplorable. Third, there is
no denying the fact that in combination with the 22 per cent already
reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, this will
mean that around half the seats in such institutions are now blocked
to most young people known to this writer, as well as to the readers
of this magazine (in short, to 'people like us'). Why, then, is
this magazine pumping for reservations?
Simple, because it would seem to be the most
pragmatic affirmative action. So, are people like Kris Lakshmikanth,
the CEO of The Headhunters, a Bangalore-based hr consultancy ("Reservations
can play havoc in it because people are the most important asset;
that's why companies choose the best talent."), N.R. Narayana
Murthy, the Chairman of Infosys ("The solution is not reservation
in education or in employment; the solution is to make the disadvantaged
people more competition-worthy."), and Rahul Bajaj, the Chairman
of Bajaj Auto ("This could lead to job reservations in the
private sector; if need be, we will fight this to the Supreme
Court.") wrong? Let's add one more question mark to the profusion
that decorates this composition. Would this magazine support job-reservation
in the private sector? Yes.
India
Inc., actually, is no stranger to reservations. There is reservation
for the progeny and assorted relatives of the families that control
several business groups (let's take this professionalisation thing
with a pinch of salt, shall we?). There is reservation for men
(over women; yes, the glass ceiling is real). And, in the case
of companies founded by defection capital (professionals who go
out, raise money, and start a company), there is reservation for
the founders themselves. Merit is recognised, of course, but only
up to a level. Then, there's the fact that the better-known and
the better-performing Indian firms (or subsidiaries of multinationals)
boast systems that can make average, even mediocre managers look
good.
India Inc. is no stranger to reservations.
Merit is recognised, but only up to a level |
From an entirely different perspective, existing
quotas in engineering and medical schools appear to be either
inadequate (based on data provided by the state of Tamil Nadu
which indicates that the ratio of SC/ST/OBC: 'open category' students
in Class XII is 3.5: 1) or not strictly enforced (again, in Tamil
Nadu, some 10,000 to 15,000 seats blocked for students belonging
to SCs/STs/OBCs in engineering schools go abegging). In West Bengal,
according to the West Bengal University of Health Sciences, 783
of the 2,374 students in various medical schools (a third), belong
to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, or Other Backward Classes.
The corresponding proportion in engineering schools, according
to the West Bengal University of Technical Education, is 26 per
cent. And according to the Directorate of Technical Education
in Maharashtra, only 2,162 of the 46,575 students admitted to
engineering schools in the state every year come from a SC/ST/OBC
background.
There are two ideal approaches to deal with
the underprivileged: one involves family income-based reservation
(not possible in a country where only 2 per cent of the population
pays taxes, which means that incomes of the others cannot be verified);
and another requires the government to focus on bettering the
quality of primary education (now, that's a real challenge). With
neither being practicable in the medium-term, a policy of reservation,
with all its accompanying systemic inefficiencies would appear
to be the solution (and, at one level, reservations are not very
different from tax holidays provided by the government to companies).
Would the quality of education at engineering and business schools
such as the IIMs and the IITs suffer? Would the performance of
companies deteriorate? Only if there is something radically wrong
with their much-touted teaching methodologies or training programmes.
-Reported by Krishna Gopalan, Ritwik
Mukherjee, Nitya Varadarajan and Rahul Sachitanand
INSTAN
TIP
The fortnight's burning question.
Is there a need to restructure compensation
in the public sector?
Yes, but not
across the board. U.K. Sinha, CMD, UTI Asset Management Company
Compensation at the entry level is higher
in the public sector than the private sector, but is much lower
at the middle and leadership levels. There is a need for incentive-based
compensation, but not an across the board hike.
Yes, absolutely.
G.P. Goenka, Chairman, Duncan Goenka Group
The level of salaries in the public sector
is ridiculous. How do they expect to retain talent? It is high
time they do something about it. (If things go on like this) There
will come a time when no one wants to join a PSU.
Yes, but
with caution.
Hema Ravichandar, Consultant
We must take a cost to company perspective.
Public sector salaries involve several unique benefits. Also,
how do you cost job security and a greater work life balance?
There could still be a gap, and including a significant variable
pay component in salaries is a way out.
--Compiled by Shaleen Agrawal
Q&A
"R&D Is A Cog In Our India Plan"
From
screening urine samples at the Olympics to testing 70 per cent
of the world's mobile phones, there isn't much that isn't done
on Agilent equipment. Since 2000, however, the Palo Alto, California-based
firm has faced rough weather and seen revenues halve from the
high of $11 billion (Rs 48,400 crore then) in 2000. The company's
President and CEO Bill Sullivan,
however, tells Rahul Sachitanand that
the firm is back.
What is different about the new Agilent?
We have exited some non-core areas, including
our semiconductor business and made some acquisitions to strengthen
our core test market.
How crucial is India to your strategy?
India and China are two of our fastest growing
markets in the world and we see this gesture (of investing $25
million or Rs 112.5 crore in a 2,000-person facility in Gurgaon)
as a sign of our commitment. The massive growth in wireless telecom
is a huge plus; the local pharma, biotech and bioinformatics market
rely on our equipment. We also see software development and R&D
as another cog in our India plan.
Finally, will we see more drug cheats
caught in Beijing in 2008?
The bad guys always seem to be a step ahead
of the cops. We were rather successful at Athens, but the emergence
of newer techniques such as 'blood doping' (which increases the
red cell mass in an athlete's body and therefore, oxygen supply)....
We now have to focus on upgrading our tests or devising new ones.
|