|
At the head of the class: Actually,
Ramadorai heads a company in a class of its own |
Visitors to the
verdant, large, showpiece campuses from which Nandan Nilekani,
President, CEO and Managing Director, Infosys, and Azim H. Premji,
Chairman, Wipro, operate from in different parts of Bangalore,
usually come away impressed, even overwhelmed. In stark contrast,
the 11th floor offices at the Air-India building in Mumbai's central
business district of Nariman Point, where TCS' CEO and MD S. Ramadorai
works from, are almost spartan and functional. The difference
isn't just an issue of aesthetics. Nor is it a function of real
estate costs in each of these cities (though this is important).
The thing is, the three offices are fairly accurate reflections
of the character of the organisations they lead.
For all its spartan looks, though, TCS is
the big daddy of India's it services industry. It ended 2005-06
with revenues of close to $3 billion (Rs 13,500 crore); it hit
the mark a mere three years after touching $1 billion (Rs 4,500
crore) in revenues; and it is nearly a third larger than its nearest
Indian competitor. If it continues with the 30 per cent plus growth
rate which it achieved last year for the next five years, it will
easily cross the $10-billion mark. If it grows faster, which is
possible, given the company's recent track record in pitching
and bagging big deals, worth several hundreds of millions of dollars,
over the past few months, it will reach the magic figure even
faster. And the company's vision, 10 by 2010 (revenues of $10
billion by 2010), outlined initially as a stretch target, will
become reality.
With 66,480 employees and another 30,000
to be added in the next 12 months, the company, which pioneered
the factory system in it, has rewritten the dictionary when it
comes to the word scalability, a rewrite that hasn't gone entirely
unnoticed. "In terms of scalability, TCS seems to be out
in front in this regard and is always thinking ahead about 'where
next'," says Dana Stiffler, Research Director, Consulting
and it services, AMR Research. "It leads in terms of global
scope and reach by a margin that Infosys and Wipro will be hard
pressed to catch up with, unless we see a major acquisition by
either."
THREAT PERCEPTION |
»
Emphasis on bagging large deals might come at the
cost of margins
» Higher
share of onsite revenues, that push margins down
» High
component of milestone-linked fixed price contracts
» Billing
rates are lowest among Tier-I Indian players
» Over
dependence on BFSI segment |
Despite a reputation of being conservative
when it comes to compensation, TCS' attrition rate of 9.9 per
cent is the lowest among large it services firms in India. That
could be a critical factor; a study by India's software lobby
nasscom and consulting firm McKinsey estimates that the Indian
it sector will face a shortfall of half a million people by 2009.
"While our compensation matches industry standards, the fact
that we have the lowest attrition, shows that culture in the company
makes people stick around," says the soft-spoken Ramadorai.
Numbers are not the sole reason why TCS is
best placed to hit the magical $10-billion mark first, though
that helps. The breadth, width and depth of its portfolio of offerings
make it a clear favourite. While other Indian vendors like Wipro
and Infosys have their own strengths in key verticals, TCS' substantial
presence in banking, financial services, insurance, telecom, manufacturing,
retail and consumer goods, transportation, energy and utilities,
life sciences and healthcare, media and entertainment, and business
process outsourcing (BPO) makes it a player to reckon with. It
has 929 clients compared to Wipro's 502 and Infosys' 460.
Already, this unmatched breadth and depth
is translating into clear gains in the marketplace if the large
deals the company has bagged in the recent past are any indication.
The $250-million (Rs 1,125-crore) ABN Amro deal it bagged in September
2005 and the $847-million (Rs 3,811.5-crore) Pearl contract it
bagged a month later, gave TCS the kind of visibility across the
world that most companies covet. "We are now an automatic
contender for large, long-term contracts, across the globe,"
says Ramadorai.
WHAT THE SCORE SAYS |
TCS comes in first, or joint
first in five out of the 10 parameters (see who Will Get To
$10-billion-in-revenues First? on page 71) used to assess
the three companies. It doesn't come in last on any. Simply
put, if nothing changes in the way the three companies do
business, TCS will get to the $10-billion mark first. The
company's portfolio of offerings is the widest, and it has
displayed an ability to scale up that one wouldn't have thought
possible of TCS just a year-and-a-half ago. |
TCS has not only been bagging large deals
but also making specific niche acquisitions to augment its already
strong portfolio of offerings. In October 2005, it made two acquisitions
within a span of two weeks. First, it acquired fns, an Australian
banking solutions firm, for $23 million (Rs 103.5 crore); then,
it snapped up Comicorm, a Chilean BPO, for serving the IberoAmerican
market at a price of $26 million (Rs 117 crore). "Acquisitions
are a part of our growth strategy and we will make them where
it makes sense either in getting into a new service line or a
geography or obtain key customers but never for the sake of revenue
accretion alone," explains Ramadorai.
Not that there is nothing to fix. Partha
Iyengar, Vice President (Research), Gartner, believes the company
needs to work on marketing and branding. "If only it came
out of its marketing and branding 'hole', it'd be able to put
plenty of space between itself and the other two companies (Wipro
and Infosys)," he says, adding that because the company doesn't
do this, it continues to get clubbed with the others. "Strangely
enough, in many cases, even though TCS is the 800- pound gorilla,
the smaller companies, often including the fourth in the 'India
4', Cognizant, tend to have greater brand awareness and mindshare."
Understandably, Ramadorai disagrees with
this analysis. "It is not (about) the noise we make in the
marketplace," he says. "While there might have been
certain gaps in communicating our strengths because of our privately
held status in the past, customers focus on execution and value
delivered." There, he says, the company's "track record
speaks for itself". Still, TCS could do with some branding,
and it could do worse than look to one of its closest rivals,
Infosys (see The Brand Is Us), for some tips.
Then, there is the large onsite component
(62.5 per cent as compared to Infosys' 49.3 per cent and Wipro's
53.7 per cent) of TCS' revenues that, while enhancing the revenue
per employee, depresses profit margins considerably. For the record,
the company has managed to increase the offshore component from
28.6 per cent five years ago to 37.5 per cent now.
TCS: The
breadth, width and depth of its portfolio of offerings makes
TCS best placed to hit the $10-billion mark first. Big deals
won in the recent past and specific niche acquisitions have
helped augment its formidable position |
In an oblique reference to TCS' largescale
deployment of its employees at customer sites, Nandan Nilekani,
CEO, Infosys, says, "We are not body shoppers. While every
work has a component which has to be done onsite, our systems
and processes allow us to ship a substantial amount of work offshore."
Given that offshore (read India) means lower salary structures,
margins are naturally higher. In defence, Ramadorai says that
a large onsite presence has helped TCS bag contracts which require
deployment at customer sites or near-shore (a term that refers
to a growing preference among some customers to ship the work
not to India, but to some third destination, that is closer to
home). In her latest report on TCS, Priya Rohira, an analyst with
Mumbai-based Enam Securities, a brokerage, states that the company's
growth in revenues and net profit for 2006-07 will be 34 per cent
and 31 per cent, respectively (higher than the guidance). She
adds that growth in operating profit will have to come from "gains
from fixed price contracts and improvement in offshore share".
And while TCS has managed attrition admirably,
it could face tougher problems on the people-management front.
Today, around 6.5 per cent of TCS' workforce is composed of people
from countries other than India. As the company hires more people
at the senior level, and as it grows either organically or through
acquisition, it will have to move to a more decentralised management
structure, since that is what these senior 'on-site' hires will
expect. "What can also hold it back is its perceived (and
in many cases real) plodding bureaucracy, centralised (slow) decision
making, and its 'stealth' approach to marketing and branding,"
sums up Gartner's Iyengar. These are issues Ramadorai and his
team would do well to handle as they eye 10 by 2010, maybe earlier.
At the head of the class? Actually, Ramadorai
heads a company in a class of its own
|