|
Wipro's Premji: The company is in good
shape, but questions about that 81.44 per cent stake refuse
to go away |
This
soaps-to-software conglomerate has made its largest shareholder,
Chairman Azim H. Premji, the richest Indian. While Infosys and
TCS can trace their origin to tech roots, Wipro proudly points
out its top management's business orientation, crucial, the implication
goes, in a market that places emphasis on business and not just
technology solutions.
Actually, conglomerate might be a bit of
a stretch for what is essentially India's third largest it company.
Truth be told, while Wipro does manufacture and sells everything
from soaps and bulbs, to furniture and powdered glucose, 92 per
cent of its revenues and 95 per cent of its profits comes from
the it business. And while CEOs and other members of the management
may come and go, one steadfast hand has guided the Wipro ship
through shoals and gales, that of Azim Premji. Infosys and TCS
might resemble each other in some respects, but Wipro stands out
for its unique revenue and market mix. While a vertical like bfsi
(banking, financial services and insurance) brings the bulk of
revenues for the other two-41 per cent for TCS and 36 per cent
for Infosys-Wipro derives a mere fifth from this important segment.
That's an important number to note because BFSI is the largest
chunk of the market, accounting for nearly 60 per cent of all
technology spending. The number reflects Wipro's late start in
the segment; outsourced R&D, termed product-engineering services
in industry jargon, accounts for 31 per cent of the company's
revenues, energy and utilities, 10.9 per cent, and telecom, 5.7
per cent. These are its core areas, its strengths.
THREAT PERCEPTION |
»
Net margins lowest among Tier-I Indian players
» Some
acquisitions may work and some may not (like Spectramind almost
didn't)
» Pure
play consulting revenues have declined Y-o-Y. So the moving
up the value chain proposition might be affected, also harming
chances of bagging end-to-end deals
» Attrition
rates are higher than the other two companies
» Long-term
management stability and succession issues remain string of
pearls |
Another key differentiator is that Wipro has
always focussed on the domestic market. It derives 21 per cent
of its revenues from the Indian market. The corresponding number
for Infosys is less than 2 per cent and TCS, a more respectable
12.5 per cent. And this, say execs at the company, isn't just
about broad-basing revenues and reducing risk. Several service
offerings such as infrastructure management services (IMS), testing
and validation, and system integration actually grew out from
the domestic market. As Sudip Nandy, Chief Strategy Officer of
Wipro, points out, "If we can satisfy the Indian customer
who demands the biggest bang for the buck and drives a hard bargain
for value proposition, it is much easier to satisfy international
clients." Some of these offerings have grown into significant
differentiators. IMS, for one, is one area where Wipro has an
edge over Infosys and TCS. "While a TCS or an Infosys has
an edge when a TOS (total outsourcing solution contract) emphasises
ADM (application development and maintenance), Wipro has an edge
if it includes substantial portion of IMS," says one industry
analyst.
Wipro's dependence on the US as a market
is also the least among the Big Three, with that geography accounting
for 50 per cent of its revenues as compared to 65 per cent for
Infosys and 60 per cent for TCS. Thus, in case of any slowdown
in the American markets, Wipro is likely to be impacted the least.
The issue of succession, however, continues
to haunt Wipro. Premji owns an 81.44 per cent stake in Wipro and
while he has repeatedly stressed that ownership and management
are not really related, this is one question that refuses to go
away.
However, what has really set Wipro apart
from its peers is its aggressive acquisition strategy. Alok Shende,
Head (ICT Practice), Frost & Sullivan, points out that Wipro
has been the most visible in the M&A space, with decidedly
mixed results. Though now dubbed as the "string of pearls"
strategy (something that implies strategic fitment), Wipro started
off on the M&A trail as a way to buy growth in 2002 when the
market was slowing down. Since then, there has been a considerable
change in the IT ecosystem itself. Wipro has made eight acquisitions
in the last four years for a total value of $231 million (approximately
Rs 1,000 crore).
WHAT THE SCORE SAYS |
Wipro, on the basis of scores,
is #3 in a three-horse race. That's because the company
comes in last on seven of the 10 parameters used (see Who
Will Get To $10-billion-in-revenues First? on page 71).
However, of the three, it is Wipro that has made the most
rapid strides over the past few years. And of the three,
it is Wipro that has been the most aggressive when it comes
to M&As. One large acquisition is all it will take to
tilt the balance in favour of the company.
|
Unlike Infosys, which has completed just one
acquisition (Expert InfoSystems, Australia, for $23 million or
Rs 108 crore then, in December 2003), or TCS, which has made a
few, Wipro has been aggressively chasing M&A deals to grow
its technology and industry capabilities. The company sees inorganic
growth as a key to expanding its business and one day challenge
global technology giants such as IBM and EDs on their own turf.
"Acquisitions will be a cornerstone of our growth strategy
and we will continue to look for viable opportunities both to
enhance our technology skills and enter new markets," says
Nandy who also heads the company's M&A initiatives. "Building
scale is going to be a huge challenge in the services business
and these deals are going to help us gain the required size."
The company has acquired everything from
a plain vanilla BPO firm to high-end chip design hotshop. Its
acquisition of third-party BPO vendor Spectramind e-Services (renamed
Wipro BPO) in January 2003 gave it a huge boost in the then fledgling
BPO market, since it inherited nearly 3,000 employees and seven
customers. If this deal was at the low end of the market, then
the $18.7 million (Rs 87.89 crore then) it spent on buying NerveWire
(with billing rates nearing $200 an hour and net profit margins
of 40 per cent) gave it a toehold in the high-end financial services
consulting arena. While Wipro's M&A activity has spanned a
wide gamut of areas, its deals have their share of critics. "The
Spectramind acquisition was not done after complete business due
diligence," alleges one analyst, implying that in its hurry
to enter the space, Wipro overlooked several details. "Spectramind
had several problems like a very high ratio of the low-margin
voice business and high attrition rates." He adds that in
the NerveWire instance, Wipro didn't really do a good job of integrating
the boutique us-based consulting firm with itself, an Indian software
services company, resulting in "several exits".
Despite such hiccups, Wipro's senior executives
clearly see inorganic growth as a very important ingredient of
their overall plan. "Our experience with acquisitions has
been satisfactory and it has given us confidence to pursue this
strategy more aggressively in the future," says K.R. Lakshminarayana,
Corporate Treasurer, Wipro. "Inorganic initiatives can help
accelerate our strategic and operational plans to supplement our
organic growth rate." As this magazine goes to press, Wipro
is on the prowl again, this time in Europe for a niche technology
buy. Right now, Wipro's "string of pearls" for its chain
is far from complete. And a substantial acquisition could catapult
Wipro into the pole position in the race to $10 billion (Rs 45,000
crore).
|