| As the union 
                commerce and Industry Minister of two years, 
                Kamal Nath has been a tacit supporter of FDI in retail. 
                Recently, Nath managed to get consensus on and approval for 51 
                per cent ownership by single-brand retailers. However, allowing 
                multi-brand retailers like Wal-Mart in may be some time away. 
                In an interview to Business Today's R. 
                Sridharan, the minister-whose book rack at his office 
                in Delhi's Udyog Bhawan sports a copy of Sam Walton's autobiography 
                Made in America-explained why:  At the Hanover Technology Fair in late 
                April this year, you said that you would announce the "second 
                stage" of retail reforms by mid-June. Are you on track, and 
                what exactly does it entail? Retail is not an easy sector to deal with 
                when it comes to FDI (foreign direct investment). As you know, 
                97 per cent of the trade is dominated by mom-n-pop stores and 
                the sector is the second-largest employer after agriculture (6-7 
                per cent of the total workforce is employed in retail). Opening 
                of FDI in retail should not displace or replace the existing small 
                players, and any decision on this has to be based on the widest 
                possible political consensus and stakeholder consultations.
 But the threat to kirana stores is from any big player, it 
                doesn't matter whether he is Indian or foreign.
 You have a point, but the general apprehension 
                is that global retail chains, with their deep pockets, would be 
                able to sustain losses for many years till their immediate competitors 
                are wiped off. The predatory pricing strategy of large retailers 
                would drive out small retailers, resulting in job losses. Again, 
                these are only general apprehensions.  Yet, you have allowed single-brand retailers 
                to come in with 51 per cent equity ownership.  I think consumers would benefit from foreign 
                investment in segments like consumer durables, apparel or even 
                home improvement. We are going to host the Commonwealth Games 
                in 2010, can you think of any one big retail store where you can 
                get all sorts of sports goods? Is there a hardware store you can 
                go to for do-it-yourself home improvement? So far, investments 
                in the organised formats have only taken place at the front end 
                (outlets), while the back-end (supply chain) has not attracted 
                investment.  Unless you allow big retailers why will 
                anyone invest in the back-end-even if you allow FDI here? We have not taken any decision in this regard, 
                but we must evolve a model that results in an incremental growth 
                of the organised retail sector, generates new jobs, and attracts 
                investment not merely in outlets, but also in the entire supply 
                chain, logistics and other services.  When do you think some further opening 
                up of retail to FDI will happen?  We are looking at how to address all the 
                issues I mentioned earlier and we have asked foreign retailers 
                also to give us a tear-free model, but I don't think we have set 
                a date for it.  Do you think your allies' victories in 
                the five states will strengthen the UPA government's hand and 
                allow for greater reforms, and in retail in specific? Certainly, we believe that much more consolidation 
                is happening in Indian polity, and that bodes well for reforms 
                in general. |