EDUCATION EVENTS MUSIC PRINTING PUBLISHING PUBLICATIONS RADIO TELEVISION WELFARE

   
f o r    m a n a g i n g    t o m o r r o w
SEARCH
 
 
DEC. 17, 2006
 Cover Story
 Editorial
 Features
 Trends
 Bookend
 Money
 BT Special
 Back of the Book
 Columns
 Careers
 People

Placements Aplenty
It's raining opportunities this year at the summer placements of management colleges. Global investment banks, consulting firms, etc., all are lining up to hire the best brains. Intern stipends too varied, depending on the location and jobs offered. For interns based in India, stipends for the two-month stint ranged from Rs 90,000 to Rs 4.5 lakh. International stipends ranged from $12,000 to $22,000. A look at the job mart.


New Games Biz
What are young, urban Indians playing? Computer and internet games are finding growing numbers of takers. With Xbox and other gaming consoles entering many Indian homes, the rules of entertainment are surely changing. There are a variety of game titles now available-including racing, sports, action and adventure. A guide for gaming enthusiasts.
More Net Specials
Business Today,  December 3, 2006
 
 
JOINT VENTURES
The Art of Living Together
India Inc's tryst with joint ventures hasn't been encouraging, but there is always something to be learnt from them till they last.
Will this tie-up last or not? M&M's Mahindra (left) with Renault's Ghosn

There are two dilemmas that rattle the human skull: How do you hang on to someone who won't stay? And how do you get rid of some who won't go?

It was Hollywood director, producer and actor Danny DeVito, in the role of a philandering divorce lawyer, who uttered those memorable lines in the classic film of the late eighties, The War of the Roses (directed by DeVito himself), a wicked black comedy about a bitter marriage, an impending property settlement that predictably turns ugly, and DeVito's hilarious attempts at mediation. Now, dark humour may be an inappropriate backdrop for a buoyant India Inc, yet the relationship between the partners in marriage in TWOTR, and DeVito's succinct reading of their quandary, in many ways mirror the discomfort between partners in a clutch of Indian joint ventures (JVs). Some allies want to pack up and leave, others are in a mood to dump their partner, and a few have succeeded at one of the two. At the same time, obviously unfazed by the bitter experiences of bedfellows who couldn't quite hit it off and the perilous nature of such collaborations themselves, a spate of JVs has been announced by partners driven by their own conveniences.

JVs are Back in Fashion
A list of recent joint ventures
Tata Motors-Fiat
The JV will manufacture cars from the Tata Motors and Fiat stables.
Details with respect to capital infusion and technology transfer are still awaited

Mahindra-Renault
A significant JV simply because it is the first time that an Indian partner will hold a majority stake in a car JV. The project will manufacture the Logan

Mahindra-Renault-Nissan
This three-way JV will have M&M as the single largest shareholder. The JV will manufacture future Logan variants

Bharti for the retail project
The group is currently in talks with all the retail giants, including Wal-Mart and Tesco. Once the partner is decided, there is certain to be a whole host of retail formats

Kalyani Group-Singapore Technologies Kinetics
The JV will design, engineer and manufacture high technology and critical systems for the Indian defence market

Pantaloon Retail-Alpha Group
The duo will set up duty-free shops at Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi

Three recent, high-profile JVs that seem to have all the trappings of a bitter marriage are Britannia Industries, in which the Wadia group and Groupe Danone of France are equal partners; Hutchison-Essar, the partnership between the Hong Kong-headquartered conglomerate and the Ruias; and HDFC-Chubb, an insurance JV in which the partners appear to have different strategic visions. Nusli Wadia, Chairman, Britannia, and Danone are at loggerheads over the Indian partner's apparent refusal to part with financial information as well as disputes on royalty arising from the usage of established brands like "Tiger" and "Little Hearts." The Hutch-Essar JV, in which the foreign partner holds 67 per cent and the Ruias the rest, has transformed into a legal slugfest, with the Mumbai operations of BPL Mobile (a company Essar acquired on its own) in the eye of a storm. Those involved in the JV, which is spread over 16 circles and with a subscriber base in excess of 20 million, acknowledge "it's going to be a long-drawn battle, and none of the partners is willing to relent. It's not just about BPL but goes back a long time." In the process, the opportunity for an initial public offering (IPO) for a company said to be valued at roughly $9 billion (Rs 40,500 crore) has been lost, prompting even Canning Fok, Managing Director, Hutchison Whampoa to mutter to the English media that "the time (for an IPO) has gone now." In the HDFC-Chubb case, it is gathered that Chubb wants to go about the insurance business in a fairly conservative manner while HDFC is keen on being among the top three players in the game. "Obviously, there is a clash of ideologies and culture," says a source (the company has declined to comment officially). Although there has not been a formal announcement on a break-up yet, it is clear that HDFC may just have to acquire Chubb's 26 per cent holding or get in a new partner.

High hopes: Future Group's Biyani is counting heavily on JVs

Observers from the outside reckon that the hiccups being displayed at such JVs are symptomatic of a larger malaise. At a time when the Indian economy is ticking swimmingly on the back of rollicking consumption-led growth, the stakes are getting higher in high-growth consumer and services-led sectors like foods, telecom and insurance. Partners may be now seeing the benefits of going it alone, and picking at trivial disputes might be one way to rock the boat and hope that somebody eventually falls off it. It may be unfair to tar the Wadia-Danone, the Hutch-Essar JVs and the HDFC-Chubb alliances with such a sweeping brush, but India's track record at JVs isn't exactly flattering (for the record Danone maintains it has been working together with the Wadia group successfully for the last 15 years. "We value the input of all our local partners. We respect the opinion of the independent board members who constitute the Audit Committee at Britannia and their interpretation of the Indian laws and regulations," is how a Danone e-mail response to BT goes).

Triggers for a JV
TECHNOLOGY: The foreign partner can bring in high-class technology while the Indian partner has a good understanding of the local market. Telecom and automobiles are examples where this is most visible

GEOGRAPHY: This could be a case where a foreign player has a presence in many key markets and India is necessary to complete the story. Insurance here is a relevant example where large players like Prudential and Standard Life are large global players. For the Indian partner, it is a big opportunity to participate in this story

REGULATION: This is normally a case when a highly regulated sector opens up. Insurance, which for a long time was closed to foreign investment, today allows upto a 26 per cent equity participation. This has seen a flow of foreign players with players like Bajaj and ICICI being the Indian partners

SHARING OF RISK AND CAPITAL: This includes sectors like heavy-engineering that require large amounts of capital apart from technological expertise. Here, both the partners look for a scenario where risks can be equally shared

INTELLECTUAL EXCHANGE: Here, a sector like the legal business could serve as an example. Though there is no clear-cut law on the entry of foreign law firms, the intellectual advantage at both ends is hard to ignore

To be sure, right from the Godrej-Procter & Gamble joint venture that came apart in 1996 to the more recent Tata-Birla partnership in Idea Cellular (see JVs that Fell Apart) Indian promoters have walked a thin line between control and losing it. "I think JVs last only for short periods of time. The reason for getting into a JV is that you are looking for an advantage that you do not possess," explains Godrej Group Chairman Adi Godrej. Over the past decade, Godrej was involved in two significant JVs-one with GE for home appliances and the other with P&G for soaps. Both the JVs didn't last, yet Godrej has few regrets. "In the case of the JV with P&G, both of us realised that we were better off on our own. From our perspective, we had the experience of working with an MNC while for them it was about the need to have a presence in India," he recalls.

Another promoter, who has had his share of learnings via JVs, is B.K. Modi, who over the years struck partnerships with global majors like Xerox, Alcatel, Motorola and Olivetti, only to bid goodbye to them some years down the line. Today, Modi's cellular play Spice Communications, where he is the Chairman, has had partners like Australia's Telstra and Distacom in the past. The latest affiliate is Telekom Malaysia, which has picked up 49 per cent in Spice. But Modi today is sitting pretty. Or at least that's what he says. "I will call the shots, even once we go public, after which I will retain a majority holding," he explains. Clearly, Modi has realised that equal stakes ventures-as in those with Xerox and Alcatel in the past-don't go very far.

Division bells: Tata-Birla partnership in Idea Cellular landed up on the rocks

Sharing the same objectives right from the start is vital in making a JV work. Consider, for instance, the tie-up between Bajaj Electricals and Black & Decker of the US, which was a 50:50 JV. One reason it didn't last is, as Shekhar Bajaj, Chairman & Managing Director, Bajaj Electricals, points out, "The us way of thinking is about high margins while in India, we are looking for a high turnover with low margins." Bajaj adds that an ideal way to go about a JV would be to begin with a licensing agreement, and then gradually extend the scope of the relationship.

It's not as if all JVs are destined for disaster; if they're well-thought out for the long term, they can prove to be a win-win equation for both sides. "At a group level, we look for complementarity and mutual benefits," explains Kishor Chaukar, Managing Director, Tata Industries. The Tatas have AIG as a partner for the insurance businesses since the foreign partner can bring in its expertise even though its holding cannot exceed 26 per cent today. The Tatas have also looked at JVs as an entry strategy into overseas markets. Example: VSNL in South Africa. "Factors like regulations, how much a market has opened up and the relationship between two countries are considered while deciding on a JV," adds Chaukar. Recently, Tata Motors announced a 50:50 JV with Fiat of Italy to sell Fiat cars through Tata dealers. Partners in Indian auto JVs in the past haven't emerged smelling of roses, with equity alliances between Mahindra and Ford, Daimler Benz and Tata Motors, Suzuki and TVS, Piaggio and LML and PAL and Peugeot being some relationships that didn't endure.

Why JVs Fail
Reason Implication
CHANGE OF STRATEGY For a foreign partner, it is possible that India ceases to be a priority market. This happened in the case of Bell Canada when the company decided that Asia as a market was not strategic. Following this decision, it sold its stake in Tata Cellular to the Indian promoters
REGULATORY CHANGES Often, this is beyond the control of the partners. This could work against the JV when either the limit on FDI has not been hiked in time or if it has been reduced. Insurance has been a sector where the 26 per cent FDI limit for sometime now has not gone down too well with the foreign partners
THE JV DOING VERY WELL If the JV is on a very good wicket, one of the partners becomes very keen on increasing its holding which is not acceptable to the other partner. Suddenly, a scenario like a 50:50 JV becomes hard to manage
THE PARTNERS DECIDE TO GO IT ALONE Sometimes having a partner can hamper growth prospects. In the case of Tata Telecom, the Tatas decided to sell their holding to the other partner, Avaya Inc. It worked well for both the partners who felt that they would be better off on their own
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY It is very important that the ground rules are laid down well in advance. If information is withheld, it can cause considerable levels of mistrust among partners. This can have very serious consequences. The recent case of the Hutchison-Essar JV is one where the lack of transparency has been one of the key reasons for the current state of affairs.

Yet, there are always lessons to be picked up from a JV, no matter how long they last. "If you ask me today if I would go about the JV with P&G in the same manner, the answer will be an emphatic yes," adds Godrej. Perhaps some of that experience is reflected in Godrej Consumer Products, which is today growing smartly in the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Kishore Biyani, CEO, Future Group, is counting heavily on JVs. He has one for insurance, with Assicurazioni Generali Group for life and non-life insurance, and another for duty-free shops at Delhi airport with the UK-based Alpha Airports Group Plc. "My partners have a good knowledge of their business. Someone like Generali is a 175-year-old company. We bring to the table our knowledge of the Indian consumer...True partnerships always last."

Other Story Links...
 
 

    HOME | EDITORIAL | COVER STORY | FEATURES | TRENDS | BOOKEND | MONEY
BT SPECIAL | BOOKS | COLUMN | JOBS TODAY | PEOPLE


 
   

Partners: BT-Mercer-TNS—The Best Companies To Work For In India

INDIA TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS | BT EVENTS
ARCHIVESCARE TODAY | MUSIC TODAY | ART TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY