|
Lanco's Rao: Troubled times |
Ultra-mega power projects
invite ultra-mega controversy. In end-December, a combine of Globeleq-Singapore
(GS) and Lanco Infratech is awarded one of two 4,000 mw ultra-mega
power projects (the other goes to Tata Power). The gs-Lanco consortium
bags the Rs 16,000-crore Sasan project in Madhya Pradesh as it
has submitted the lowest power tariff of Rs 1.196 per unit for
the project, which is just 10 paise less than the quote of the
next bidder, Reliance Energy. It's a major victory for the Hyderabad-headquartered
group. Not for long, though.
Just a month later, GS's parent Globeleq of the UK decides to
withdraw from the project. By mid-February, the ownership at the
consortium that bid for the project changes from Lanco-Globeleq
to Lanco-Jindal (Jindal acquired equity stake in Globeleq Singapore
after the award of the project to the Lanco-Globeleq consortium).
This follows the acquisition of 100 per cent of Globeleq's equity
in GS by Prince Stone Investments, a Mauritius-based holding company
of Lanco Infratech, and Jindal Steel & Power (JSPL). Prince
Stone is to hold 60 per cent of GS, and JSPL the rest.
Current status: Even as the consortium awaits an approach from
the government and the Power Finance Corp (the nodal agency for
implementing the project) to buy Sasan Power Company and to execute
a power purchase agreement, there are calls to disqualify the
Lanco-Jindal combine as the lead bidder has had a change of parent.
There's also a call to either go in for a re-bid or to award the
project to the second-lowest bidder. Speculation also abounds
that there could have been elements of MIS-representation of facts
in the GS-Lanco bid, relating to the financials of GS, which has
been dismissed as a "shell company".
Lanco Group Chaiman L. Madhusudhan Rao rubbishes these charges.
His argument: The change of entities supporting the lead bidder
does not go against the bidding process and the lead bidder (Globeleq
Singapore) will continue to hold 26 per cent of the equity for
12 years from the date of commercial operations. On the issue
of MIS-representation, he says: "There is no MIS-representation.
At best, there is a misunderstanding based on the contention of
one of the bidders and this would be cleared once the bid document
is read in full and not in pockets as both the annual report of
Globeleq and their banker's statement have been included."
Globeleq Singapore, he says, submitted the numbers of its parent,
Globeleq. This, therefore, says Rao, "only shows that Globeleq
Singapore qualified for the bid based on the strength of its $1.8
billion (Rs 7,920 crore) asset-based Globeleq
We have secured
and submitted the legal opinion from two former chief justices
of India, who have given legal opinions in favour of the consortium
for taking up the power project," he adds. He is, however,
not willing to comment on the speculation that the bid evaluation
committee headed by HDFC Chairman Deepak Parekh had met recently
and has perhaps decided to ease out Lanco. "We have no communication
and perhaps they have had an informal discussion."
For the moment, Rao maintains that he is confident about the
consortium continuing to be with the project. To support this,
he points to the strengths of the consortium which, he says, has
produced bank guarantees worth Rs 300 crore, is in a position
to acquire Sasan Power Company (for around Rs 20 crore) and is
capable of achieving financial closure in 12 months for the Rs
16,000-crore project. As BT goes to print, the first 90 days since
the award are already over and Lanco is still keeping its fingers
crossed!
-E. Kumar Sharma
Posco's
Not Leaving
But the Korean steel giant may be irked with
delays.
|
MP Kamal Nath: No more delays |
Will India have to bid
adieu to Rs 52,000 crore? If Posco is indeed getting more despondent
by the day on account of delays in getting approvals for its proposed
12 million tonne steel plant in Orissa, that may well be the case.
However, days after the reported threat of the world's fourth-largest
steel maker to review investments in India, the South Korean steel
giant appears to have changed its mind. "Posco is very serious
and committed about the Orissa project. We've already paid the
money for 1,135 acres (of the 4,004 acres needed) and as soon
as possession is given we'll start work," a Posco India spokesman
told BT. This comes on the heels of Posco CEO Ku Taek Lee's meeting
with Union Commerce and Industry Minister Kamal Nath and subsequent
assurances from the Centre and Orissa government over land allotment
and mining leases.
Posco had signed a memorandum of understanding with the Orissa
government in June 2005. However, in the wake of stiff resistance
from locals (who allege the company wanted to acquire land at
throwaway prices) at its project site in the Jagatsinghpur district,
and delays in awarding mining lease, the company reportedly started
contemplating a shift to Vietnam. That plan may have been shelved,
for now. On the vexed issue of mining leases, the spokesman says:
"It's only that the mining ministry has asked for clarifications
and we are confident that the state government will furnish these
in due time." The Orissa government had agreed to give Posco
a lease to mine 600 million tonnes of iron ore. But permission
has yet to come from the Centre, which is reviewing the country's
49-year-old mining laws.
-Ritwik Mukherjee
Why
VCs Love SKS
It gives loans to the poor and returns
to the loaded!
|
SKS' Akula: With hotshot investors in
tow, he can empower more |
If your interests lie
in the bottom line you are likely to stay away from the poverty
line. If that is how we have come to define investors, it is perhaps
time to think again. Sequoia Capital, whose track-record boasts
of providing venture capital to the likes of Google, Yahoo!, and
YouTube, has now chosen to invest in SKS Microfinance, one of
the fastest growing micro-finance institutions (mfis) in the world.
It has an outreach of nearly 600,000 women borrowers in 7,200
villages in India, with 260 branches in 11 states.
Last year alone, SKS grew by nearly 160 per cent and disbursed
nearly Rs 700 crore with a 99 per cent on-time repayment rate.
SKS-happy being referred to as the 'Starbucks of Microfinance'
as they are both aggressive in business rollouts-announced last
fortnight its latest equity investment of $11.5 million (Rs 50.6
crore) with Sequoia Capital as its lead investor. Other investors
included Unitus Equity Fund, Vinod Khosla, Ravi Reddy, Odyssey
Capital, and-from a previous round-SIDBI. SKS's total equity now
is Rs 65 crore and funds raised are to provide the stimulus to
achieve its ambitious goal to provide financial services to over
5 million poor families by 2010. This goes to make SKS the largest
venture-backed MFI in the world.
According to Vikram Akula, founder & CEO, SKS Microfinance,
"the move is also significant from the point of the microfinance
sector as it will encourage more commercial capital to come into
microfinance, ultimately to enable greater financial inclusion
for India's 400 million poor people." Mohit Bhatnagar, Operating
Partner, Sequoia Capital India, says: "We're always looking
for young and dynamic entrepreneurs to fund, and SKS has the two
pre-requisites we look for in companies-a large market and a platinum
team. It is truly wonderful to be an investor in an enterprise
that not only makes economic sense, but that also helps to empower
people across our nation."
Other than rapid growth, SKS has today gone beyond just providing
loans. It offers life insurance to 1.2 million customers and has
recently piloted innovative new ventures, including health insurance
for the poor and urban microfinance for India's thousands of slum-dwellers.
SKS charges an average interest rate of 25 per cent, which is
cheap compared to money lenders and other financial organisations
who charge anywhere between 35 and 75 per cent; add to that transaction,
travel, brokers' fees and costs in bribes that the villagers have
to dole out, and they're only too happy to pay the no-strings-attached
25 per cent.
SKS also has an NGO (non-governmental organisation) affiliate,
SKS Ultra PoorProgram, which is focussed on bringing the very
poor into the realm of mainstream microfinance. SKS changed its
NGO status into a for-profit company in late 2006, but Akula is
quick to add that this change in status has made little difference
to the company and the way it is run. "When we were an NGO
we worked with the business rigour of a for-profit company, and
now that we're for-profit, we work with the same drive as we did
when we were a non-profit company. Apart from the legal status,
we're the same thing."
Interestingly, the 2,500 field staff that make up 90 per cent
of the company's employees-who are 10 plus 2 graduates from rural
areas-are most often the sons and daughters of SKS' borrowers.
As Akula puts it: "We initially started it as a social development
effort. It turned out to be a great business strategy, because
even if they've never worked on a computer or in an office before,
they've got very good field skills; they know the customer."
For Vikram Akula, 38, who raised $50,000 in 1996 by hosting
tea parties for about 356 friends and relatives in the US, to
return to India from the US and set up SKS in 1998, it is perhaps
time to take credit!
-E. Kumar Sharma and Deepti Khanna
Bose
|