|
M&A
Who'll Win Air India?
Wanted: a fair partner with sound
finance, managing expertise, and (preferably) a strong lineage.
By Suveen
K. Sinha
Everyone
loves happy-endings. And what could be happier than the return of the
national carrier Air India to the Tata fold. ''It'll be nice to be back in
Air India,'' mused Ratan Tata, while announcing India's largest business
house's desire to become what he termed a 'strategic partner' in Air
India. ''I wish he were here today.'' The 'he' referred to was J.R.D. Tata,
Ratan Tata's predecessor as the Chairman of the Group, the man who piloted
the first Tata Airlines flight from Karachi to Mumbai via Ahmedabad in
1932, and the Chief Executive who headed the airline till its
nationalisation (and rechristening) in 1948.
Well, Tata may have been the only one to
have made his intentions public, but he certainly isn't the only one in
the race (although given the GoI's stately divestment pace it can hardly
be called that). There are the Ambanis of Reliance, if one were to go by
Arun Shourie, the candid Minister for Disinvestment. Then there is the
usual clutch of foreign airlines. Singapore International Airlines (SIA),
which made an abortive bid to build a domestic airline with the Tatas, and
two others whom Ratan Tata refuses to name, are not averse to being part
of the Tata consortium. Virgin, Tata clarified at the press conference,
wasn't one of them.
That doesn't rule out Richard Branson's
airline though, which already has a load-linked seat-sharing deal with Air
India. ''We will be watching the privatisation process closely, very
closely... And when it happens, we will be an interested party,'' Branson
told BT during his visit to India earlier this year. Delta, Air France,
and KLM Northwest are said to be looking for Indian partners.
Swiss Air, and British Airways (people BT
spoke to claimed) weren't averse to the idea of a stake in Air India. And
BT learns that Indian Pilots' Guild is all set to submit an expression of
interest. That's an impressive list of suitors for a lame duck.
So, What's In It For The Suitors?
Waiting
for the wedding |
Tata |
(+)
Fathered AI, sound finances, services experience
(-) An earlier abortive try at building
a domestic airline |
Reliance |
(+)
Immense financial strength, excellent track record
(-) No experience in aviation or
service sector |
SIA |
(+)
Huge fleet, known expertise, likely to partner Tata
(-) Previous bid to enter aviation in
India proved abortive |
Virgin |
(+)
Already has a seat-sharing deal with AI
(-) Not very rich, just sold 49 per
cent equity to SIA |
It isn't sentiment that is behind the Tata
announcement. The cold calculus of reason is the moving force fanning the
interest of the Tata Group and other companies in Air India.
Aviation-although the performance of several domestic carriers may not
show it-is a profitable business. And some of the facts now being aired as
AI's weaknesses, are, in truth, (air) pockets of opportunity. The airline
uses just around 60 per cent of routes that are rightfully its own under
bilateral agreements (routes are allotted by two countries to their
respective 'flag carriers' on a reciprocal basis, and if one country, like
the US, does not have a flag carrier, the allocation is shared among
several designated carriers).
Fleet constraints have forced Air India to
discontinue some flights to UK, and it doesn't service Frankfurt-both
lucrative sectors. This will come in handy for someone like SIA, with its
immense financial strength, and its huge fleet that can be utilised better
if it can make use of Air India's bilateral rights.
Then there is the huge infrastructure owned
by Air India, which puts it in a unique position to provide handling
services to most foreign airlines touching down here. For instance, at the
Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport in Mumbai, practically all the
buildings are either owned by Air India or taken by it on lease from
Airports Authority of India (AAI). ''It's some of the less noticed rights
and privileges of Air India that make it lucrative for a strategic
investor,'' says Ranjit Walia, a lawyer specialising in aviation. Along
with Indian Airlines and AAI, Air India has exclusive rights to provide
aviation-linked security services. This is a big business in many
developed countries, big enough for Swiss Air to float a subsidiary to
take care of it. Another intangible is India's geographic location.
The intangibles make it difficult to assess
the true worth of Air India and an indication will be available only after
the GoI comes out with a package on its assets after all the expressions
of interest have been submitted (deadline: November 10, 2000).
A Suitable Boy
Choosing the strategic partner, on the face
of it, should be a rather simple exercise for the GoI. The chosen one
ought to have a balance-sheet that shows enough muscle to make the airline
soar again. It must have a network that is vast and, at the same time, one
that can be synergised with Air India's. The trend in the global aviation
sector is towards alliances: these extend to reservations and ground
services and mean lower costs for all members of the alliance. And it will
certainly help if the country of origin of the foreign airline that is
part of the bidding consortia enjoys good diplomatic relations with India.
Indeed, the most likely scenario is that the government divests its stake
to a consortium where an Indian company or a corporate group is the
dominant partner, although the operations of the airline itself will be
looked after by a foreign airline that is the lesser partner. Says Manushi
Roy, Deputy Director-General, Confederation of Indian Industry: "A
good track record in whatever business they are in is important, as is
financial strength.'' If this line is taken, the Tata Group and the
Ambanis do have an edge. They do have the brand-cadence (and the coffers)
to attract one of the large global airlines as a partner. Still, by making
his intention public, Tata may have forced the hand of other companies
interested in Air India and gained an edge. His group, after all, runs one
of the better hotel chains in the country (a service business like
airlines). The Pilots' Guild, too, fancies its chances. Says its President
S.B. Varma: "We have the expertise. And when expertise is available
in-house, why look outside?" The guild is now looking for an Indian
corporate house or financial institution as partner to add financial
muscle.
Will The Menage-A-Trois Work?
Although GoI will retain a 40 per cent
stake in Air India even after the disinvestment, the bidders are confident
that it will give the strategic partner a free hand in running the
operations. ''Otherwise, what's the point in choosing a strategic
partner?'' asks Tata. But many free market economists believe a total
privatisation, like in the case of British Airways, may be a better
option.
Some good may come out of the high
government holding in a privatised Air India. ''It may encourage the
government to retain Air India's monopoly on security services even after
the privatisation,'' says Walia.
The immediate task for the strategic
investor, however, will be to revive Air India, whose operations have
shrunk considerably. Tata, who has served a three-year tenure as AI's
Chairman, says it's now an ethnic carrier. He flies it sometimes, but
never out of choice.
|