| 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  | M&A
 Who'll Win Air India?
 Wanted: a fair partner with sound
      finance, managing expertise, and (preferably) a strong lineage. By   Suveen
      K. Sinha  Everyone
      loves happy-endings. And what could be happier than the return of the
      national carrier Air India to the Tata fold. ''It'll be nice to be back in
      Air India,'' mused Ratan Tata, while announcing India's largest business
      house's desire to become what he termed a 'strategic partner' in Air
      India. ''I wish he were here today.'' The 'he' referred to was J.R.D. Tata,
      Ratan Tata's predecessor as the Chairman of the Group, the man who piloted
      the first Tata Airlines flight from Karachi to Mumbai via Ahmedabad in
      1932, and the Chief Executive who headed the airline till its
      nationalisation (and rechristening) in 1948.
 Well, Tata may have been the only one to
      have made his intentions public, but he certainly isn't the only one in
      the race (although given the GoI's stately divestment pace it can hardly
      be called that). There are the Ambanis of Reliance, if one were to go by
      Arun Shourie, the candid Minister for Disinvestment. Then there is the
      usual clutch of foreign airlines. Singapore International Airlines (SIA),
      which made an abortive bid to build a domestic airline with the Tatas, and
      two others whom Ratan Tata refuses to name, are not averse to being part
      of the Tata consortium. Virgin, Tata clarified at the press conference,
      wasn't one of them. That doesn't rule out Richard Branson's
      airline though, which already has a load-linked seat-sharing deal with Air
      India. ''We will be watching the privatisation process closely, very
      closely... And when it happens, we will be an interested party,'' Branson
      told BT during his visit to India earlier this year. Delta, Air France,
      and KLM Northwest are said to be looking for Indian partners. Swiss Air, and British Airways (people BT
      spoke to claimed) weren't averse to the idea of a stake in Air India. And
      BT learns that Indian Pilots' Guild is all set to submit an expression of
      interest. That's an impressive list of suitors for a lame duck. So, What's In It For The Suitors? 
        
          | Waiting
            for the wedding  |  
          | Tata |  
          | (+)
            Fathered AI, sound finances, services experience (-) An earlier abortive try at building
            a domestic airline
 |  
          | Reliance |  
          | (+)
            Immense financial strength, excellent track record (-) No experience in aviation or
            service sector
 |  
          | SIA |  
          | (+)
            Huge fleet, known expertise, likely to partner Tata (-) Previous bid to enter aviation in
            India proved abortive
 |  
          | Virgin |  
          | (+)
            Already has a seat-sharing deal with AI (-) Not very rich, just sold 49 per
            cent equity to SIA
 |  It isn't sentiment that is behind the Tata
      announcement. The cold calculus of reason is the moving force fanning the
      interest of the Tata Group and other companies in Air India.
      Aviation-although the performance of several domestic carriers may not
      show it-is a profitable business. And some of the facts now being aired as
      AI's weaknesses, are, in truth, (air) pockets of opportunity. The airline
      uses just around 60 per cent of routes that are rightfully its own under
      bilateral agreements (routes are allotted by two countries to their
      respective 'flag carriers' on a reciprocal basis, and if one country, like
      the US, does not have a flag carrier, the allocation is shared among
      several designated carriers). Fleet constraints have forced Air India to
      discontinue some flights to UK, and it doesn't service Frankfurt-both
      lucrative sectors. This will come in handy for someone like SIA, with its
      immense financial strength, and its huge fleet that can be utilised better
      if it can make use of Air India's bilateral rights. Then there is the huge infrastructure owned
      by Air India, which puts it in a unique position to provide handling
      services to most foreign airlines touching down here. For instance, at the
      Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport in Mumbai, practically all the
      buildings are either owned by Air India or taken by it on lease from
      Airports Authority of India (AAI). ''It's some of the less noticed rights
      and privileges of Air India that make it lucrative for a strategic
      investor,'' says Ranjit Walia, a lawyer specialising in aviation. Along
      with Indian Airlines and AAI, Air India has exclusive rights to provide
      aviation-linked security services. This is a big business in many
      developed countries, big enough for Swiss Air to float a subsidiary to
      take care of it. Another intangible is India's geographic location. The intangibles make it difficult to assess
      the true worth of Air India and an indication will be available only after
      the GoI comes out with a package on its assets after all the expressions
      of interest have been submitted (deadline: November 10, 2000). A Suitable Boy Choosing the strategic partner, on the face
      of it, should be a rather simple exercise for the GoI. The chosen one
      ought to have a balance-sheet that shows enough muscle to make the airline
      soar again. It must have a network that is vast and, at the same time, one
      that can be synergised with Air India's. The trend in the global aviation
      sector is towards alliances: these extend to reservations and ground
      services and mean lower costs for all members of the alliance. And it will
      certainly help if the country of origin of the foreign airline that is
      part of the bidding consortia enjoys good diplomatic relations with India.
      Indeed, the most likely scenario is that the government divests its stake
      to a consortium where an Indian company or a corporate group is the
      dominant partner, although the operations of the airline itself will be
      looked after by a foreign airline that is the lesser partner. Says Manushi
      Roy, Deputy Director-General, Confederation of Indian Industry: "A
      good track record in whatever business they are in is important, as is
      financial strength.'' If this line is taken, the Tata Group and the
      Ambanis do have an edge. They do have the brand-cadence (and the coffers)
      to attract one of the large global airlines as a partner. Still, by making
      his intention public, Tata may have forced the hand of other companies
      interested in Air India and gained an edge. His group, after all, runs one
      of the better hotel chains in the country (a service business like
      airlines). The Pilots' Guild, too, fancies its chances. Says its President
      S.B. Varma: "We have the expertise. And when expertise is available
      in-house, why look outside?" The guild is now looking for an Indian
      corporate house or financial institution as partner to add financial
      muscle. Will The Menage-A-Trois Work? Although GoI will retain a 40 per cent
      stake in Air India even after the disinvestment, the bidders are confident
      that it will give the strategic partner a free hand in running the
      operations. ''Otherwise, what's the point in choosing a strategic
      partner?'' asks Tata. But many free market economists believe a total
      privatisation, like in the case of British Airways, may be a better
      option. Some good may come out of the high
      government holding in a privatised Air India. ''It may encourage the
      government to retain Air India's monopoly on security services even after
      the privatisation,'' says Walia. The immediate task for the strategic
      investor, however, will be to revive Air India, whose operations have
      shrunk considerably. Tata, who has served a three-year tenure as AI's
      Chairman, says it's now an ethnic carrier. He flies it sometimes, but
      never out of choice.
     |