CASE GAME
The Case of The Hysterical
IT Company
Buffeted by the slowdown in the US, what
should A1 Technologies do? P. Erinjery of Thirdware Solution, S.
Mandrawadkar of IONA, and A. Desai of Mastek discuss.
By R.
Chandrasekhar
As
his shot fell somewhere in the middle of a ragged clump of trees that
passed for woods in this part of India, Rajneesh Dham couldn't help but
think how his game had deteriorated over the first six months of 2001.
Golf was the only other thing in the life of Dham, a bachelor, who, at 43,
looked at least five years younger.
The 'main' thing, of course, was the company
he had founded, A1 Technologies, and that too, had seen its performance
tumble over the past six months. It was either one of those irritating
coincidences, Dham thought to himself, or it was just that work was
affecting his game. After all, hadn't he shot that magnificent 4 under
par, the day after his company's stock touched an all-time high.
Hunting for his golf ball in the woods, Dham
found himself remembering an incident from work. The occurrence concerned
Chirag Dave, the company's head of hr. Dave had been his hire from the
campus of one of India's best b-schools, and he'd never had occasion to
regret the decision: over time, the fresh-faced recruit had grown into an
astute manager when it came to managing knowledge workers.
But yesterday, Dham had seen a different side
of Dave: at a meeting of the company's executive committee, the man had
come across as an almost hysterical individual muttering statistics about
how the slowdown in the us economy was forcing companies to cut their
infotech-spend.
HURDLES
BEFORE A1: |
The Areas Of
Concern
» Margins
under pressure due to decline in billing rates
» Idle
capacity on the rise due to drying up of projects
»
Competitors
cutting prices to gain customers
»
Limited
customer base |
IMMEDIATE
OBJECTIVES: |
A Four-Layered
Gameplan
» Safeguarding
the niche positioning
»
Retaining
existing customers
»
Finding new
streams of revenue
»
Enhancing
volumes and margins |
Dham tried to play things down. ''Remember
the Y2K? Or the euro-dollar conversion business that followed? We were on
a high. But we were also worried: What next? Well, we got over it, didn't
we? We used those opportunities to build relationships. We will do the
same thing now.''
But Dave wasn't to be silenced so easily.
''However, the situation was different then; business was booming. There
was room for all. Besides, every client was hiking it spend. There was no
talk of cost-cutting. No one in the IT sector thought of idle capacity.
Today, 40 per cent of our engineers are on the bench. The fundamentals of
business have changed.''
Now, placing the ball on the tee at the 9th
hole, Dham was thankful for the conference call that had terminated their
meeting. He really had not had the answers to the questions raised by Dave
and other members of the executive committee.
''We'll continue this on Monday,'' he had
reassured Dave, and the rest of the team. He didn't find that prospect
appealing at all.
Dham had always been the cheerleader. What
his colleagues didn't know was that, this time, even he was worried.
Several software biggies, with whom A1 had
consciously avoided competing in the past were now invading its territory;
a price-war was looming large on the horizon; and all major customers had
unilaterally reduced billing rates, between 25 per cent and 40 per cent.
''If our existing vendor cannot match these billing rates,'' a missive
from one customer had said, ''we have no option, but to look for new
vendors.''
The Beginning And The Beginning Of The End
Dham had founded A1 in the heady days of the
early 90's infotech boom. The company soon carved out a niche for itself
in linking companies to their suppliers, partners, and customers. The
task, as Dham never tired of telling anyone who cared to listen, involved
some programming, and lots of maintenance.
Software biggies gave this niche the go-by:
there was more money in pure programming. And A1 managed to tap the
booming small and medium enterprises (SMEs) segment in the US. It didn't
boast any Fortune 500 companies in its client-list, but it have more than
a dozen SMEs that swore by A1, and kept coming back to it.
But now, that very focus was beginning to
hurt. The US was A1's single largest market; worse, the bulk of the
company's revenues (about 75 per cent) came from 12 SMEs. Dham, and his
senior management team had thrashed the issue threadbare at the meeting
where Dave seemingly lost it. Marketing, everyone had agreed, was one area
A1 could do with some improvement in. Rajeev Marwah, the company's
Vice-President (Accounts), had been scathing in his comments. ''We have to
correct some mistakes of the past. Marketing has always been our weakest
link. Now the link is in danger of snapping altogether.'' Marwah had
suggested that A1 build a stronger marketing team by co-opting engineers
who were on the bench. With 40 per cent of A1's workforce on the bench,
that hadn't appeared like a bad idea to Dham.
It wasn't that the company hadn't seen things
coming. It had. Since early 2001, a team of engineers had been working on
two initiatives under the guidance of Hemanth Shah, the head of A1's
projects function. One was to conduct courses and workshops on e-biz for
A1's customers; and the other was to develop a set of products that would
support the design, implementation, and management of e-biz applications.
''Both initiatives,'' Shah had pointed out in
a tone that suggested he wouldn't have anyone imply he hadn't done his job
well, ''are ready to roll out''.
Dave's concern, though, wasn't about the
long-term strategy of attracting new clients; it was about the short-term
imperative of retaining existing clients, by reducing billing rates if it
was necessary.
''We should go for topline growth even if it
means reduced margins. The latter must be offset against improvements in
productivity and operational efficiency. When we help customers reduce
their costs, the customers will stay on with us. We must make sure that we
go that extra mile for them,'' he had argued.
The rest of the meeting had passed in a
chaotic blur. Shah had warned about software biggies cutting their rates,
and Chintan Parekh, the CFO, had insisted that moving to a fixed-fee
contract would solve all problems.
Dham had been weakly suggesting a possible
alliance with a software major, which could outsource projects to A1 when
the call had come. ''Only,'' Dham said aloud, as he readied to take a
swing, ''I don't have any better ideas now.''
CASE
SOLUTIONS
Send us your solution
Readings List
|