| Blame 
              it on Godhra. What should have been an open-and-shut case of communal 
              violence, is turning out to be corporate India's worst nightmare. 
              Not because business in a state that accounts for 6 per cent of 
              the country's GDP is in a shambles. Rather, it's because Godhra 
              has struck at something infinitely more precious-confidence. It 
              has uprooted optimism and planted uncertainty in its place-and fruits 
              of uncertainty are always bitter.  For an economy standing at the beginning of 
              a new fiscal just how shaky do things look? ''The situation is very 
              unsatisfactory,'' says R. Seshasayee, MD, Ashok Leyland.  Indeed. Nobody is sure how long the fractured 
              National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government will last. A change 
              in administration-possibly succeeded by an equally weak alliance-could 
              lead to changes in policies. That means companies will have to rework 
              their strategies. Those who are unable to, will pay for no fault 
              of their own.  Worse, key reforms needed to bolster industry's 
              competitiveness may be pushed back. Already, the government is rolling 
              back some cost-saving proposals made in Budget 2002 such as the 
              hike in the liquified petroleum gas prices, and some cuts in subsidies. 
              It's hard to quantify the damage such dithering may cause, but it 
              is easy to see that its impact will be severe. ''The heightened 
              political and social unrest is likely to depress growth and investments 
              in the country,'' contends Paul Rawkins, Senior Director, Fitch 
              Ratings, and the man in New York who does the sovereign rating for 
              India.  The vote of no confidence in India could not 
              have come at a worse time. As the first flush of corporate results 
              seem to indicate, there was some kind of a revival-or what S.S. 
              Bhandare, former economic adviser to the Tata group, calls the ''beginning 
              of a creeping recovery''-happening in the last quarter of 2001-02. 
              With industry cutting back on spending and consumers putting off 
              their purchases, how will the economy fare in 2002-03? To put together 
              a big picture, BT looked at five key components of the economy. 
              The findings weren't, to say the least, heart-warming. Let's take 
              up these five components one by one: 
               
                |  |   
                | "The overall situation is not at all 
                  conducive for growth and the nascent revival is likely to be 
                  hit." R. Seshasayee, Managing Director, 
                  Ashok Leyland
 |   
                |  |  
                | "Gujarat can easily say goodbye to foreign 
                  investment for the next 10 years." U.R. Bhat, CIO, Jardine Fleming 
                  Asset MGMT, Company
 |  Sectoral Growth  The Central Statistical Organisation's (CSO) 
              data for the third quarter (October-December) seems to corroborate 
              the notion of an economic revival. GDP growth at 6.3 per cent was 
              much higher than the 3.4 per cent growth recorded in the same quarter 
              last year. Where did the growth come from? Agriculture and services. 
              Thanks to good monsoon, agriculture grew by 7.1 per cent compared 
              to 0.8 per cent in the same period 2000-01. But the star performer 
              was the services sector, which clipped at 7.2 per cent. Worryingly, 
              though, industry grew by just 2.3 per cent.  If the demand for goods holds up, then the 
              industrial sector may end up with just 3-4 per cent growth in 2002-03. 
              That means agriculture and services will have to grow even faster 
              to make up for industry's shortfall. Is that likely? Services-which 
              comprise sectors like aviation, tourism, hospitality, and financial 
              services-could be affected if domestic travel drops. While airlines 
              and hotels are reporting improvements in capacity utilisation, it's 
              still not a boom scenario that they witnessed as recently as 2000. 
              The industry's best projections put the number of incoming tourists 
              at 24 lakh-that's 8.54 per cent drop over 2000, when 26.24 lakh 
              foreign tourists came to India.  The BT-NFO MBL survey of 178 CEOs, Vice Presidents, 
              and General Managers across Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad, 
              and Kolkata, reveals that 30 per cent of the respondents did not 
              expect to increase their capital spend in 2002-03. While M&A-thanks 
              largely to the government's disinvestment deals-brought booming 
              business last year, pure corporate deals may be harder to find this 
              fiscal. Agrees Ashwani Puri, Partner, Pricewaterhouse-Coopers: ''Mergers 
              and acquisitions will be affected, and the problem for the acquiring 
              company is that it will be unable to fix a proper valuation for 
              acquisition because of the uncertainty factor.''  While agriculture is likely to have recorded 
              a significant growth (6-7 per cent) last year (2001-02), most economists 
              believe that sustaining the performance next year will be difficult. 
              The reason is simple: last year's growth looks substantial because 
              its benchmark is a negative growth of 2 per cent in 1999-2000.  Add all the numbers up and the overall GDP 
              may grow by 5.5 per cent, half a per cent less than expected. Per 
              capita income, too, will inch up only by 3 per cent to Rs 17,200. 
              ''To catch up with the world we need to grow at a much faster rate, 
              but unfortunately the current environment isn't conducive for such 
              growth,'' says Saumitra Chaudhury, Chief Economist at credit rating 
              agency, ICRA.  Indeed, the impasse in Parliament over the 
              removal of Gujarat Chief Minister, Narendra Modi, has not only effectively 
              blocked the passage of important economic bills, but also put the 
              reforms agenda on hold. Instead of introducing the much-promised 
              second-generation of reforms, the Vajpayee administration is busy 
              rolling back critical proposals such as cuts in subsidies to food 
              and fertiliser, and tax sops. Other measures that would have reduced 
              non-plan expenditure and yielded Rs 8,000 crore to the cash-strapped 
              government are also being revoked. To make matters worse, some key 
              bills such as the Fiscal Responsibility Bill, the Competition Bill, 
              the Insurance (Amendment) Bill, and the Electricity Bill have been 
              hanging fire for months now.  Foreign Investment  Last year, India received a mere $2.4 billion 
              (Rs 11,640 crore) in foreign direct investment. Consider the country 
              lucky if it crosses that figure this year. Here's the problem: foreign 
              investors perceive the Godhra carnage as symptomatic of the country. 
              And when you have other countries-like those in Latin America-going 
              out of their way to woo foreign investors, there's no reason why 
              a multinational would want to put its investments at risk.  Purely in terms of economics, the recovery 
              of markets in America and other Asian countries makes it harder 
              for India to win investor dollars. Typically, most of India's foreign 
              direct investment goes into core sectors such as power, telecom, 
              and oil. These are all capital-intensive and long-gestation industries, 
              where constant change in government policies affect investor confidence. 
              ''Only those investors who believe that they can get higher returns 
              from India rather than other emerging markets, will now invest in 
              the country,'' notes Kaushik Dutta, Partner in the international 
              consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers. As for Gujarat, ''it can 
              easily say goodbye to foreign investment for the next 10 years,'' 
              says U.R. Bhat, Chief Investment Officer, Jardine Fleming Asset 
              Management Company.  At the moment India's sovereign rating hasn't 
              been affected, but if things worsen rating agencies may decide on 
              a downgrade. Warns Rawkins of Fitch: ''If (the Gujarat issue) distracts 
              the government from economic priorities of the day, which it appears 
              to be doing, and weakens its resolve to pursue economic reforms 
              and contain the deteriorating budgetary situation, then the implications 
              from a rating point of view could be significant.''  Consumer Confidence  More than Godhra, it is probably Finance Minister 
              Yashwant Sinha's Budget this year that has dampened consumer sentiment. 
              Consider how a consumer in India's middle-class looks at his situation 
              today: Companies are laying off employees, the cost of education 
              and contemporary lifestyle-neither is reflected in the index for 
              inflation-is going up, even as incomes are either stagnating or 
              growing only marginally.  Worse, apart from effecting an across-the-board 
              hike of 3 percentage points in income tax (through an additional 
              surcharge), the Budget slashed tax benefits on investments in small 
              savings and significantly reduced the number of people who could 
              avail these benefits. Again, taxing dividend income from mutual 
              funds and equity in the hands of the investors has added to their 
              misery. Says Bhandare: ''The Budget has done the biggest damage 
              to consumer confidence, which is reeling under the effects of a 
              slowdown.''  Already, growth in the FMCG and auto sectors 
              is eluding manufacturers. Hindustan Lever, India's largest FMCG 
              company, reported a fall in sales by 9.9 per cent in 2001. In automobiles, 
              while motorcycle sales are zooming, those of cars have grown at 
              a marginal 3.6 per cent. (Tractor sales are actually negative.) 
              Many analysts believe that if some low-end segments of consumer 
              goods are doing well, it's because consumers are trading down-moving 
              from relatively high-priced items to cheaper ones in the same category. 
              ''That's a typical consumer response, when she is not sure about 
              her future income,'' says Dutta of PricewaterhouseCoopers.  Still, if corporate results for 2001-02 have 
              been good, it's primarily because over the last six years of slowdown, 
              companies have learnt to be more efficient. A case in point again, 
              Hindustan Lever, which despite its 9.9 per cent fall in sales increased 
              its net profits by 26.2 per cent. Points out Bhat: ''What everybody 
              seems to be missing out is the fact that there have been dramatic 
              improvements in the capital efficiency of the companies.'' The point, 
              however, is that without real growth, there's only so much mere 
              efficiency can yield.  The Markets  Never the most stable of stockmarkets, the 
              Bombay Stock Exchange Sensex is currently less volatile. The Federation 
              of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) recently conducted 
              a poll in which 50 per cent of the respondents said that the Sensex 
              would hover between 4,000 and 5,000 by the year end. Unlikely, say 
              several others. Especially if foreign institutional investors limit 
              their exposure. And that is almost a certainty. Almost three-fourths 
              of BT's respondents felt that foreign portfolio investment would 
              be affected by the political uncertainty, and a third said the investment 
              would fall marginally.  Public sector scrips-typically those on the 
              block-that drove the stockmarkets in the recent months, appear to 
              be losing steam. For instance, Shipping Corporation of India is 
              3.8 per cent off its peak, and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd 
              (BPCL) is down to Rs 302.9 compared to Rs 351.40 just three weeks 
              ago. Explains Chaudhury of ICRA: ''Market players are just giving 
              expression to the foreboding of bad news and nervousness about upcoming 
              uncertainties.''  Exports  A steadily falling rupee is just about the 
              only good news the Indian exporter is getting. Otherwise, the scenario 
              is grim. Indian exports, already reeling under a worldwide recession 
              (exports are estimated to have grown by just 3 per cent last year), 
              could falter again. Higher oil prices are likely to negatively impact 
              the recovery in the US and European economies, and to that extent 
              depress their appetite for imports.  Gems and jewellery, dyes, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals-major 
              export items in the Indian export basket-have a significant presence 
              in Gujarat, and have been affected by the violence in the state. 
              Ramu S. Deora, Chairman of Basic Chemicals, Dyes and Pharmaceuticals 
              Export Promotion Council, while unwilling to guesstimate the potential 
              losses, believes that exports of chemicals, dyes, and pharmaceutical 
              products have been hit substantially because of transportation problem 
              and large-scale worker absenteeism that lasted nearly a month. So 
              the 11.8 per cent export growth for the next five years as envisaged 
              in the new export-import policy may remain a dream.  For the damage to be controlled, first the 
              sporadic violence in Gujarat and other places must die down. Then, 
              the Budget must get passed for industry to feel confident about 
              the Vajpayee government's staying power. Thereafter, the government 
              must get back to the business of governing-of creating an environment 
              where industry can compete globally, and consumers feel confident 
              about their tomorrow. But given the impasse in Delhi, all that seems 
              a tall order. |