|
TCS' Ramadorai: On the brink of a consolidation
|
It's
the whisper of the season at d-street: ''Buy CMC.'' The CMC stock
may have risen some 350 per cent-it was quoting at Rs 682.40 on
April 22, 2002-since its acquisition by Tata Consultancy Services,
and it could go up some more. Driving the ascent is what TCS CEO
S. Ramadorai is expected to say when he releases TCS' first elaborate
financial statement to the world at large in the first week of May.
The market expects the financials to be accompanied by an announcement
on TCS' much-awaited initial public offering of a rumoured 10 per
cent of its stock and, hopefully, by another on how the Tata Group
plans to consolidate all its it businesses under one roof. ''The
logical thing will be to first list TCS, then consolidate all infotech
businesses of the group (the others being Tata Elxsi and Tata Infotech,
in addition to CMC), and then take the combined entity global,''
says a TCS insider, hinting at a possible listing on NASDAQ. Ergo,
the interest in the CMC scrip can be attributed to a growing perception
that it is perhaps the most economical way to acquire TCS stock.
And how!
However, no word is forthcoming
on the subject officially. All that vice-president Phiroz Vandrevala
is willing to reveal is that ''a valuation of all the assets and
capabilities of the two companies is going on to determine how the
synergies can be best leveraged''.
So, should you buy CMC stock? Not if you are
a believer in the fundamentals. But since when has that been a constraint?
-Suveen K. Sinha
BATA
The Emperor's New Sole
There's nothing
radically different about Bata's restructuring plan but this: it
could be the last.
A new CEO, labour
costs that are 25 per cent of sales, a plunging bottomline, and
yet another restructuring plan. That's the story of Bata India.
So, when the new man in the hot seat, Fernando Garcia speaks of
new launches and mentions brands like Weinbrenner, the initial reaction
is to step back and say, ''Didn't the company try that once?'' It
did. Ditto with Garcia's comment on ''creating a four-tiered hierarchy
of dedicated stores, each designed to meet the particular needs
of the customer''. Thus the International Store will stock Bata's
international range and imported brands (like Dr Scholl's); the
City Store will cater to the needs of the high- and middle-income
groups; the Family Store will vend mid-range footwear; and the Bazar
Store will typically feature merchandise that has to go (read: sale!sale!sale!).
That doesn't address the issue of the company's high wage costs.
Nor does it solve the gripe-of-choice of Bata distributors: low
channel margins that are rendered even lower by the carrying cost
of the inventory thrust on them by the company. We're watching your
next step, Mr Garcia.
-Moinak Mitra
JET AIRWAYS
The Case Of The Tainted(?) Airline
Even Arthur Conan Doyle couldn't have penned
a more gripping corporate whodunnit.
|
Jet's Naresh Goyal: The mystery deepens |
The
doggedness with which questions about ownership of Jet Airways keep
surfacing is matched only by its promoter Naresh Goyal's resolve
to reveal as little as possible. Ergo, last month, even as newspapers
were full of news about Goyal's alleged links with underworld dons
Dawood Ibrahim and Chota Shakeel, the NRI Goyal kept quiet, except
for issuing denials that took the form of ads. Last year in June,
a similar controversy had arisen, and Goyal had used a similar tactic.
This time round, Jet seems to be in hotter
water. The immediate provocation is a letter written by the Intelligence
Bureau to the Minister of Home Affairs, in which the agency is believed
to have aired its suspicions of Goyal using underworld money to
run the airline. In fact, the agency also claimed that it had a
transcript of a call that Goyal allegedly made to Dawood Ibrahim.
Now, there's talk of cancelling Jet's operating licence for security
reasons. But the airline, which claims not having received any formal
communication from the government in this regard, dismisses the
stories as baloney. ''We have complied with all rules and are ready
to cooperate with any investigative authority,'' says Saroj Datta,
Executive Director, Jet Airways.
The fact that Jet is owned by Tailwinds, a
company registered in secrecy-friendly Isle of Man, adds to the
controversy. Some Jet supporters say that the airline is being hounded
because Disinvestment Minister Shourie-who has openly expressed
his intrigue over Jet's ownership-thinks it was Jet that grounded
his Air India disinvestment plan. Who's right? It's hard to say.
But what's clear is that in this proxy war, truth is emerging as
the biggest casualty.
-Abir Pal
TEN SPORTS OPENS ITS ACCOUNTS
Abdulrahman Bukhatir's sports channel bags
the soccer World Cup rights.
If it's still India's
exploits on the cricket pitches of the Caribbean that are giving
you your jollies, wake up: World Cup soccer begins from May 31,
and beaming this one-month fiesta into your living room will be
Ten Sports, the channel promoted by Dubai-based tycoon Abdulrahman
Bukhatir's Taj Entertainment. ''The soccer World Cup is the world's
biggest sporting event,'' says Chris McDonald, CEO, Taj. Whilst
figures ranging from Rs 20 crore to Rs 200 crore are being bandied
about as the sum paid for the rights, McDonald says it's closer
to Rs 20 crore. ''If I paid Rs 200 crore, I would need to be fired,''
quips the former espn-Star Sports Senior VP. Meantime, Sony TV's
SetMax has bagged the telecast rights for world cricket, including
the next two World Cups, for $255 million (Rs 1,220 crore). There's
still some time to go for the next Cricket World Cup, which gives
Sony time to figure out how it's going to make that kind of money.
-Brian Carvalho
EIH
Strategic Investor Or Black Knight
ITC's 13.79 per cent stake in East India Hotels
sets tongues wagging even as the company says all's well.
|
P.R.S. 'Biki' Oberoi: Playing the Sphinx |
Long
ago the Birlas held more equity in Tata Steel than the Tatas. This
case isn't quite similar but ITC's 13.79 per cent holding in East
India Hotels has set tongues wagging in the marketplace about a
possible open offer. ITC now holds its stake in EIH through three
firms: Peninsular Investment, New Deal Finance, and Megatop Financial
Services. And the tobacco major's stake in the Oberoi-controlled
company has risen 3.39 per cent since August 2001. ITC is quick
to dismiss any predatory aspirations: ''We are investing purely
from a strategic point of view and have no takeover intent,'' says
K. Vaidyanath, Executive Director, ITC. EIH, too, is not unduly
perturbed and the promoters, the Oberoi family, have made no effort
to shore up their holding, which stands at 40.95 per cent.
The broker fraternity, however, has a different
story to tell. With ITC placing a great deal of stress in its non-tobacco
businesses, hotels, the story goes, could well be the focus of the
company's growth efforts. In fact, marketmen point to some statements
made by Chairman Y.C. Deveshwar at the ITC AGM last year and at
the EGM to consider the Bhadrachalam merger, that ITC would not
be averse to acquisitions that help the growth process.
So, why are both sides playing it cool?
-Debojyoti Chatterjee
INDIA
ONE
Why Is This Man Smiling?
After much dithering, BSNL agrees to provide
subscribers access to Bharti's long-distance services.
|
IndiaOne's N. Arjun: The smile is back |
On
April 22, 2002, N. Arjun, CEO of Bharti Enterprises' long-distance
arm IndiaOne, allowed himself a smile. And it wasn't just because
his company had just announced the launch of its international service
with tariffs half of the current rates. Few knew that Arjun had
just got news that IndiaOne would soon be able to connect to the
state-owned basic telephony companies Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
(subscriber base: 37 million), and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd
(subscriber base: 5.2 million).
''Interconnect for ILD (international long
distance) should happen this week and for domestic should happen
selectively by May 15,'' says Arjun. That's almost three months
after IndiaOne launched its service. Thus far, the company's service
has been limited to calls arising from cellular networks (where
it has a 90 per cent marketshare) and from its own basic services
network. Hypothetically (assuming IndiaOne would have been able
to get at least 40 per cent of calls arising from BSNL and MTNL's
networks in the past months), the company has lost some Rs 700 crore
of revenue. Industry sources claim that the state-owned telecom
companies have acted just as Bharti was considering legal recourse.
Still, Arjun's glee could be short-lived. BSNL and MTNL are yet
to work out how much of the revenue will go to IndiaOne and how
much they will keep. And BSNL will give IndiaOne access to its subscribers
in phases, first a few cities, then a few more. We'd like to see
what happens once the Competition Bill gets through a Parliament
obsessed with everything but the economy.
-Suveen K. Sinha
|