Shankar
Varma was already a legend. The company he had started in a garage
some 25 years ago, Bharat Datasystems Ltd (BDL), was the pioneer
of India's computer hardware revolution. But the future was software,
and here, service firms such as PCX, Powertech, Mercury, and TruSoft
had stolen ahead of it.
Varma's original business had recently been
split into two-and he was running the software unit, BDL Technologies.
These were tough times, given the spend-cuts and client attrition
caused by the tech slump.
Varma needed clarity on the future, and that's
what this meeting was about. "First of all," he said to
his strategic team, "I want everyone's opinion on how we could
have mitigated the slowdown."
Voices spoke. Varma listened intently for an
hour. Finally, Raj Singh, Vice President (Marketing), summed up
the meeting with three concluding points. "One, we are over-dependent
on a niche business serving the software needs of telecom equipment
firms. Two, we need to improve relationships with corporates. And
three, we must watch for signs of value migration."
Value migration. That was the phrase that had become central to
Varma's future analysis chart. He had already seen value migrate
from hardware manufacture to software services, and any company
that couldn't keep up with 'dematerialisation' would suffer, he
knew. In the DEMAT future, information was value, and it wanted
to be as free of material entrapments as possible. The challenge
was to identify precisely what kind of information could add the
most value to business processes-and these were the sub-migrations
he had to detect, ahead of the curve, to gain an edge.
Some 25 years ago, Varma's garage team was
a revolutionary force. Today, BDL was not even a change agent, and
Varma worried whether his company had become too bureaucratic, risk-averse
and preservation-minded, to reshape the market. Could he inject
it with the raw entrepreneurial passion that created BDL to begin
with?
Software is a global business. There is
nothing like a good alliance to stimulate ideas and encourage
talent.
|
The founder looked at his executives. Then,
"Acquisitions," he announced. All eyes turned to him.
"Global acquisitions."
That was enough to charge the room with excitement.
"Our balance sheet has Rs 1,200 crore in reserves," smiled
H. Mathur, the CFO, "And valuations have never been lower.
We can bargain hunt."
"Yes," said Varma, "We've had
valuable foreign partnerships in the past, and we can rework the
magic now. Software is a global business. There's nothing like a
good alliance to stimulate ideas, encourage talent, and energise
business."
Thus, the meeting ended. Things worked speedily,
after a merger team was instituted, headed by T.P. Rangachary, who
made it clear that the idea was to correct deficiencies in the product
portfolio. Mathur wanted the deal structured to minimise integration
problems. "We won't pay more than 1.5 per cent of market cap,"
he said.
The next few months saw BDL snap up 51 per
cent of MES, an enterprise application software firm, for $2.9 million.
Next, it acquired a majority stake in the Germany-based Mondo Software,
a banking software company, for $25 million. Then it got 90 per
cent of an Irish call centre, Delfast Diana, for $11.5 million,
followed by Gulf Tech, which was working for many US state departments,
for $13 million.
For just $63 million, BDL Technologies had
got businesses delivering revenues of $85 million for the latest
quarter, and that too, from diverse fields of enterprise, with clients
so different that they'd probably need an interpreter to converse
with one another.
As Varma assured the managements of the acquired
firms, BDL was not interested in taking day-to-day control. "You
guys run the show," he told them. The performance chart that
BDL brought in, to judge the management, was no different from what
was the standard worldwide.
The idea was not to let the 'takeover' word
scare anybody. The strategic reason for the acquisitions, Varma
told the CEOs privately, had nothing to do with the imposition of
BDL's worldview. But yes, BDL wanted a direct line on customer feedback.
It also wanted its Indian marketing professionals to gain access
to global customer satisfaction benchmarks, particularly on 'DEMAT'
issues.
The overseas staff appreciated it. But back
in Delhi, the BDL board was asking pointed questions.
"What's the point?" asked a boardmember.
"What's the strategy? These are a completely ill-fitting bunch
of firms from all across the world, and their value remains what
it was when we bought them. If we're not running them, how are we
gaining anything?"
"Shankar," began another board member,
"We're with you. We've always been with you, and we trust your
gut. But seriously, Shankar, we can't let these firms drain our
resources. Why be soft on them?"
The first board member re-entered the argument.
"Shankar," he said, "we don't want to be a pain.
But this business has come from a garage to this place because it
has always been clear about its future. HDL has always been able
to confront facts fair and square. That's why I ask: isn't this
an open-and-shut case of buying revenue?"
The question was blunt, but Varma had handled
bluntness before. He cleared his throat to speak.
What should Varma say to defend his acquisitions?
1 2
|