|   Shankar 
              Varma was already a legend. The company he had started in a garage 
              some 25 years ago, Bharat Datasystems Ltd (BDL), was the pioneer 
              of India's computer hardware revolution. But the future was software, 
              and here, service firms such as PCX, Powertech, Mercury, and TruSoft 
              had stolen ahead of it.  Varma's original business had recently been 
              split into two-and he was running the software unit, BDL Technologies. 
              These were tough times, given the spend-cuts and client attrition 
              caused by the tech slump.   Varma needed clarity on the future, and that's 
              what this meeting was about. "First of all," he said to 
              his strategic team, "I want everyone's opinion on how we could 
              have mitigated the slowdown."   Voices spoke. Varma listened intently for an 
              hour. Finally, Raj Singh, Vice President (Marketing), summed up 
              the meeting with three concluding points. "One, we are over-dependent 
              on a niche business serving the software needs of telecom equipment 
              firms. Two, we need to improve relationships with corporates. And 
              three, we must watch for signs of value migration."   
              Value migration. That was the phrase that had become central to 
              Varma's future analysis chart. He had already seen value migrate 
              from hardware manufacture to software services, and any company 
              that couldn't keep up with 'dematerialisation' would suffer, he 
              knew. In the DEMAT future, information was value, and it wanted 
              to be as free of material entrapments as possible. The challenge 
              was to identify precisely what kind of information could add the 
              most value to business processes-and these were the sub-migrations 
              he had to detect, ahead of the curve, to gain an edge.  Some 25 years ago, Varma's garage team was 
              a revolutionary force. Today, BDL was not even a change agent, and 
              Varma worried whether his company had become too bureaucratic, risk-averse 
              and preservation-minded, to reshape the market. Could he inject 
              it with the raw entrepreneurial passion that created BDL to begin 
              with? 
               
                | Software is a global business. There is 
                    nothing like a good alliance to stimulate ideas and encourage 
                    talent. |   The founder looked at his executives. Then, 
              "Acquisitions," he announced. All eyes turned to him. 
              "Global acquisitions."   That was enough to charge the room with excitement. 
              "Our balance sheet has Rs 1,200 crore in reserves," smiled 
              H. Mathur, the CFO, "And valuations have never been lower. 
              We can bargain hunt."  "Yes," said Varma, "We've had 
              valuable foreign partnerships in the past, and we can rework the 
              magic now. Software is a global business. There's nothing like a 
              good alliance to stimulate ideas, encourage talent, and energise 
              business."  Thus, the meeting ended. Things worked speedily, 
              after a merger team was instituted, headed by T.P. Rangachary, who 
              made it clear that the idea was to correct deficiencies in the product 
              portfolio. Mathur wanted the deal structured to minimise integration 
              problems. "We won't pay more than 1.5 per cent of market cap," 
              he said.  The next few months saw BDL snap up 51 per 
              cent of MES, an enterprise application software firm, for $2.9 million. 
              Next, it acquired a majority stake in the Germany-based Mondo Software, 
              a banking software company, for $25 million. Then it got 90 per 
              cent of an Irish call centre, Delfast Diana, for $11.5 million, 
              followed by Gulf Tech, which was working for many US state departments, 
              for $13 million.  For just $63 million, BDL Technologies had 
              got businesses delivering revenues of $85 million for the latest 
              quarter, and that too, from diverse fields of enterprise, with clients 
              so different that they'd probably need an interpreter to converse 
              with one another.   As Varma assured the managements of the acquired 
              firms, BDL was not interested in taking day-to-day control. "You 
              guys run the show," he told them. The performance chart that 
              BDL brought in, to judge the management, was no different from what 
              was the standard worldwide.   The idea was not to let the 'takeover' word 
              scare anybody. The strategic reason for the acquisitions, Varma 
              told the CEOs privately, had nothing to do with the imposition of 
              BDL's worldview. But yes, BDL wanted a direct line on customer feedback. 
              It also wanted its Indian marketing professionals to gain access 
              to global customer satisfaction benchmarks, particularly on 'DEMAT' 
              issues.   The overseas staff appreciated it. But back 
              in Delhi, the BDL board was asking pointed questions.  "What's the point?" asked a boardmember. 
              "What's the strategy? These are a completely ill-fitting bunch 
              of firms from all across the world, and their value remains what 
              it was when we bought them. If we're not running them, how are we 
              gaining anything?"  "Shankar," began another board member, 
              "We're with you. We've always been with you, and we trust your 
              gut. But seriously, Shankar, we can't let these firms drain our 
              resources. Why be soft on them?"  The first board member re-entered the argument. 
              "Shankar," he said, "we don't want to be a pain. 
              But this business has come from a garage to this place because it 
              has always been clear about its future. HDL has always been able 
              to confront facts fair and square. That's why I ask: isn't this 
              an open-and-shut case of buying revenue?"  The question was blunt, but Varma had handled 
              bluntness before. He cleared his throat to speak.   What should Varma say to defend his acquisitions? 1 2 |