| 
               
                |  |   
               Turn 
              the clock back to September 17, 2001. Barely six days after two 
              hijacked jets crashed into the World Trade Center towers, Enam Financial, 
              a leading Indian stockbroking firm, put out a startlingly bullish 
              forecast for the Indian bourses, predicting that the Sensex would 
              stunningly rebound from around 2,650 to 4,000, nearly 50 per cent, 
              in a year's time. Well, it's been a year since then and the Sensex, 
              as we go to press, is nowhere near that level-it's languishing at 
              3,024 (September 20, 2002). We don't know whether the strategists 
              who put together the report-it was Enam's India strategy report-actually 
              ate their words. But if they did, they ought not to be too embarrassed. 
              Because they would have had company at that prandial exercise. Enam's 
              report, titled "Did You Miss The Rally Of 2002?", which 
              predicted that the bounce-back would be led, in rotation, by the 
              pharma, psu, cement, and infotech stocks (none of which happened), 
              wasn't the only upbeat voice on Dalal Street. There were other bulls-in-league. 
              Big trader-operators, like Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, Ramesh Damani, Rakesh 
              Kacholia, and Ajay Dadi, were among the others who bet big on a 
              bounce-back led by PSU stocks. These operators are now in deep hibernation, 
              presumably far away from the Street, where the current mood is quite 
              the opposite of what theirs was.   Says S. Naganath, Chief Investment Officer, 
              DSP Merrill Lynch Investment Managers: ''In the short run (the next 
              three-to-four months) the markets could re-test the lows of September 
              2001.'' Agrees Arun Kejriwal, CEO, Kejriwal Research and Investment 
              Services: ''A weakness has set in and the market could hit a bottom 
              about four-to-eight weeks from now.'' 
               
                | NEXT SCAM OR FALSE ALARM? Is derivatives trading a scam waiting 
                  to happen? Some brokers think so.
 |   
                | Trading in derivatives 
                  is a relatively new phenomenon in India; it was introduced in 
                  June 2000. And while it has become quite the norm to trade in 
                  derivatives on National Stock Exchange (the total turnover in 
                  futures and options on September 20 was Rs 1,430 crore), it 
                  isn't popular at all on Bombay Stock Exchange (turnover on September 
                  20: Rs 0.77 crore). However, some brokers believe the position-limit 
                  of Rs 50 crore per broker per scrip is way too high. Their logic? 
                  The individual position limits are high when compared to the 
                  market-wide limit for a scrip. For instance, they argue, an 
                  open position of 12 members could theoretically breach the Rs 
                  581 crore market-wide limit on the Satyam Computers scrip. Ergo, 
                  they conclude, the concentration of positions could trigger 
                  a crash. These arguments are almost invariably backed by references 
                  to the crash of 2001, which many of these brokers believe to 
                  have been caused by the lack of any limits on the positions 
                  of lenders in the Automated Lending and Borrowing Mechanism 
                  (a securities lending product that provided a window for traders 
                  on NSE to borrow securities to meet their payment obligations) 
                  and bless (Borrowing and Lending Securities Scheme), although 
                  there were stringent limits on the positions of borrowers.  Still, it may be alarmist to predict a scam in the making 
                    in derivatives. First, ALBM and bless did not have marketwise 
                    limits; trading in derivatives does and these change in relation 
                    to the underlying cash market (as the cash market volumes 
                    grow, so does the marketwide limit). Second, close to 600 
                    brokers trade in derivatives and it is pretty difficult (albeit 
                    theoretically possible) for 10 brokers to corner the entire 
                    market. Finally, margins on derivatives are paid upfront, 
                    and have been as high as 50 per cent (they're a function of 
                    the volatility of a scrip). Still, there's a debate of sorts 
                    raging about the concentration of derivatives and Professor 
                    J.R. Varma has presented a report comparing derivatives trading 
                    with the carry forward system to SEBI . Remember, if there's 
                    a scam, you read it here first. And if there isn't... |  According to the India Domestic Fund Managers 
              Survey, a DSP-Merrill Lynch study that covers the 10 top fund managers 
              who together manage $48 billion (Rs 2,35,200 crore), while no fund 
              manager is downright bearish over a 12-month period, most have turned 
              more sceptical than they were a year ago and nearly half of them 
              expect the Sensex to remain below 4,000 even a year from now.   The Bears Rule  A tell-tale sign of their mood: fund managers 
              are now increasing the proportion of their funds that they want 
              to keep uninvested in the markets. According to the Merrill study, 
              only 10 per cent of equity and diversified funds are underweight 
              in cash. And a third of the fund managers surveyed now have cash 
              levels of over 12 per cent in their portfolios. The flow of bad 
              news in September hasn't helped boost confidence levels either. 
              The most recent one was when Standard & Poor's downgraded India's 
              domestic debt rating to junk bond grades on September 19. And earlier, 
              the same month, the Cabinet Committee on Disinvestment announced 
              its decision to postpone disinvestment of two state-owned oil majors. 
              The day after the decision, the 30-listed PSUs lost Rs 11,067 crore 
              in market capitalisation.   There's been more to help perpetuate the bearishness. 
              A possible clamp-down on foreign direct investment and a likely 
              stalling of MTNL's disinvestment programme all add to a generally 
              'feel-not-so-good' factor, with the market interpreting all of it 
              as a serious setback to the overall economic reforms programme. 
              Says Samir Dholakia, Director, Balance Equity: ''Investors as well 
              as traders are tired of the prolonged phase of a range-bound market 
              where nobody is making money.''  The seamier side of a bearish market is when 
              a few dubious players start taking advantage of the lack of genuine 
              players in the market. Last July, suddenly the BSE consumer durable 
              index, comprising stocks like Videocon and BPL, shot up 40 per cent 
              despite the fact that there wasn't any sound fundamental reasons 
              for it to do so: demand for consumer durables has remained flat 
              for the past year or so. The sudden spurt in consumer durable stocks 
              was followed by a sharp slump-a telltale sign perhaps of market 
              manipulation by big operators as large cap stocks peaked. Such are 
              imperfections of the Indian stockmarket that recently, the BSE Sensex 
              and NSE Nifty moved in opposite directions on the very same day 
              because rumours fuelled speculative trading in the shares of one 
              infotech company, whose floating stock (number of outstanding shares 
              that are freely available for trading) is notoriously small.   Indeed, there are whispers on the Street that 
              Ketan Parekh, the main protagonist of last year's scam, may be back 
              in action, with his favourite stocks like Aftek Infosys and HFCL 
              beginning to move once again. Remember the K-10 stocks? Well, now 
              it appears that a number of new favourites may be on the big bull's 
              favourites' list.  Lack Of Action  With trading volumes depressed-average daily 
              trading volumes on BSE in September were down by 10 per cent to 
              Rs 1,160 crore from Rs 1,278.99 crore in May this year-and stock 
              prices moving within a narrow band, it isn't surprising that even 
              day traders, who accounted for 90 per cent of total volumes in May-June 
              this year, are crying off the market. Although day traders (who 
              buy and sell and square up their trades on a daily basis) are still 
              around, they account for around 60 per cent of volumes. Points out 
              Dholakia of Balance Equity: ''Day traders make money in a volatile 
              market or if they can predict a trend. As of now the market seems 
              to be directionless leaving them with limited opportunities.''  The market's bearish listlessness is also reflected 
              in the action of the foreign institutional investors (FIIs). In 
              September, FIIs were net sellers, with net outflows of Rs 595 crore 
              ($122.3 million). Says Brian Brown, CEO and Head of Equities, Salomon 
              Smith Barney: ''There is nothing exciting and the attitude of the 
              FIIs towards India is one of indifference.'' In contrast, FIIs are 
              bullish on a range of other emerging markets, like Korea, Indonesia, 
              and Taiwan. In Korea, a long-drawn process of corporate restructuring 
              has led to FIIs pumping in funds in the last eight months. In India, 
              it has been just the opposite. In July, Credit Lyonnais Securities 
              put a 'stop loss' or 'sell' at Sensex 3,100 level. Given the fact 
              that the Sensex is well below that, a number of FIIs have turned 
              sellers. The Government of Singapore, a big investor usually bullish 
              on Indian stocks with large market capitalisation, has also reportedly 
              turned bearish on India.   Why? After all, Indian companies haven't done 
              too badly-despite the overall slowdown, a sample of 675 companies 
              showed a 36 per cent increase in profits in the first quarter of 
              the current financial year. But stalling of the process of privatisation 
              and a severe setback to the reforms process that could have been 
              a catalyst for attracting FII funds have made FIIs bearish. Says 
              Naganath: ''Emerging markets are getting increasingly localised. 
              You need to improve the local sentiment and tell your story interestingly.'' 
              Plus there are micro-deterrents. Like the uncertainty over the double 
              taxation avoidance treaty with Mauritius, where many of the FIIs 
              active in the Indian market are registered.   Plus, of course, there is the larger US factor. 
              In the US, in July 2002, individual investors withdrew $52.4 billion 
              (Rs 2,56,760 crore) from stock funds, the second biggest cash-out 
              as a percentage of total assets, and the largest ever in sheer dollar 
              volume. Many market watchers interpret this as evidence that individual 
              investors have given up on the market and the economy, suggesting 
              that things will only get worse. Says Ajit Surana, CEO, Dimensional 
              Securities: ''The weakness in the US economy is also dampening sentiments 
              in India. The market believes that without the US economy on a sound 
              footing, we may not see FII inflows.''  Cheap Yet Shunned   Indian stocks are cheap. Yet there are no takers. 
              Take blue-chip Hindustan Lever. Currently quoted at a three-year 
              low of around Rs 165, the Lever stock is down from the Rs 266 it 
              touched on March 1. Like Lever, stocks of as many as 192 companies 
              are quoting near their 52-week lows and around 1,000 at three-month 
              lows. And, according to the DSP Merrill Lynch survey, 30 per cent 
              of fund managers believe that the markets are undervalued.  Yet there's scant interest in picking stocks 
              up cheap. And while conventional Street wisdom suggests that selling 
              isn't the best of strategies when valuations are low, analysts don't 
              rule out a further dropping of valuations.   As for the paradox of lack of demand at cheap 
              prices, it could be that the general sentiment-based on macro dampeners 
              like the slowing down of reforms, the postponement of the disinvestment 
              process and the recent S&P downgrade-have overshadowed the opportunities 
              that low stock valuations offer.  Some believe that the market is waiting for 
              a fresh trigger to kick start demand. Like positive announcements 
              on the reforms process, or perhaps a reversal of trends in global 
              markets, including the US, or even a cut in personal taxes, as has 
              been hinted at by the Finance Minister. Good tidings from the corporate 
              sector may also help. Says Dileep Madgavkar, Chief Information Officer, 
              Prudential ICICI MF: ''If a few large corporates come out with good 
              results for q2 in October, especially against the backdrop of overall 
              gloom, that could be the simplest trigger.''  If triggers like those happen, the markets 
              will certainly respond. For instance, if the government gets serious 
              once again about the economic reforms process, you could expect 
              the markets to bounce back. And if the finance minister, as he has 
              been hinting, comes up with some measures that boost consumer confidence 
              and the economy perks up, you could expect the market to stir alive. 
              But if things like that don't happen, resign yourself to cohabit 
              with the bear for a while. |