|
Turn
the clock back to September 17, 2001. Barely six days after two
hijacked jets crashed into the World Trade Center towers, Enam Financial,
a leading Indian stockbroking firm, put out a startlingly bullish
forecast for the Indian bourses, predicting that the Sensex would
stunningly rebound from around 2,650 to 4,000, nearly 50 per cent,
in a year's time. Well, it's been a year since then and the Sensex,
as we go to press, is nowhere near that level-it's languishing at
3,024 (September 20, 2002). We don't know whether the strategists
who put together the report-it was Enam's India strategy report-actually
ate their words. But if they did, they ought not to be too embarrassed.
Because they would have had company at that prandial exercise. Enam's
report, titled "Did You Miss The Rally Of 2002?", which
predicted that the bounce-back would be led, in rotation, by the
pharma, psu, cement, and infotech stocks (none of which happened),
wasn't the only upbeat voice on Dalal Street. There were other bulls-in-league.
Big trader-operators, like Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, Ramesh Damani, Rakesh
Kacholia, and Ajay Dadi, were among the others who bet big on a
bounce-back led by PSU stocks. These operators are now in deep hibernation,
presumably far away from the Street, where the current mood is quite
the opposite of what theirs was.
Says S. Naganath, Chief Investment Officer,
DSP Merrill Lynch Investment Managers: ''In the short run (the next
three-to-four months) the markets could re-test the lows of September
2001.'' Agrees Arun Kejriwal, CEO, Kejriwal Research and Investment
Services: ''A weakness has set in and the market could hit a bottom
about four-to-eight weeks from now.''
NEXT SCAM OR FALSE ALARM?
Is derivatives trading a scam waiting
to happen? Some brokers think so. |
Trading in derivatives
is a relatively new phenomenon in India; it was introduced in
June 2000. And while it has become quite the norm to trade in
derivatives on National Stock Exchange (the total turnover in
futures and options on September 20 was Rs 1,430 crore), it
isn't popular at all on Bombay Stock Exchange (turnover on September
20: Rs 0.77 crore). However, some brokers believe the position-limit
of Rs 50 crore per broker per scrip is way too high. Their logic?
The individual position limits are high when compared to the
market-wide limit for a scrip. For instance, they argue, an
open position of 12 members could theoretically breach the Rs
581 crore market-wide limit on the Satyam Computers scrip. Ergo,
they conclude, the concentration of positions could trigger
a crash. These arguments are almost invariably backed by references
to the crash of 2001, which many of these brokers believe to
have been caused by the lack of any limits on the positions
of lenders in the Automated Lending and Borrowing Mechanism
(a securities lending product that provided a window for traders
on NSE to borrow securities to meet their payment obligations)
and bless (Borrowing and Lending Securities Scheme), although
there were stringent limits on the positions of borrowers.
Still, it may be alarmist to predict a scam in the making
in derivatives. First, ALBM and bless did not have marketwise
limits; trading in derivatives does and these change in relation
to the underlying cash market (as the cash market volumes
grow, so does the marketwide limit). Second, close to 600
brokers trade in derivatives and it is pretty difficult (albeit
theoretically possible) for 10 brokers to corner the entire
market. Finally, margins on derivatives are paid upfront,
and have been as high as 50 per cent (they're a function of
the volatility of a scrip). Still, there's a debate of sorts
raging about the concentration of derivatives and Professor
J.R. Varma has presented a report comparing derivatives trading
with the carry forward system to SEBI . Remember, if there's
a scam, you read it here first. And if there isn't...
|
According to the India Domestic Fund Managers
Survey, a DSP-Merrill Lynch study that covers the 10 top fund managers
who together manage $48 billion (Rs 2,35,200 crore), while no fund
manager is downright bearish over a 12-month period, most have turned
more sceptical than they were a year ago and nearly half of them
expect the Sensex to remain below 4,000 even a year from now.
The Bears Rule
A tell-tale sign of their mood: fund managers
are now increasing the proportion of their funds that they want
to keep uninvested in the markets. According to the Merrill study,
only 10 per cent of equity and diversified funds are underweight
in cash. And a third of the fund managers surveyed now have cash
levels of over 12 per cent in their portfolios. The flow of bad
news in September hasn't helped boost confidence levels either.
The most recent one was when Standard & Poor's downgraded India's
domestic debt rating to junk bond grades on September 19. And earlier,
the same month, the Cabinet Committee on Disinvestment announced
its decision to postpone disinvestment of two state-owned oil majors.
The day after the decision, the 30-listed PSUs lost Rs 11,067 crore
in market capitalisation.
There's been more to help perpetuate the bearishness.
A possible clamp-down on foreign direct investment and a likely
stalling of MTNL's disinvestment programme all add to a generally
'feel-not-so-good' factor, with the market interpreting all of it
as a serious setback to the overall economic reforms programme.
Says Samir Dholakia, Director, Balance Equity: ''Investors as well
as traders are tired of the prolonged phase of a range-bound market
where nobody is making money.''
The seamier side of a bearish market is when
a few dubious players start taking advantage of the lack of genuine
players in the market. Last July, suddenly the BSE consumer durable
index, comprising stocks like Videocon and BPL, shot up 40 per cent
despite the fact that there wasn't any sound fundamental reasons
for it to do so: demand for consumer durables has remained flat
for the past year or so. The sudden spurt in consumer durable stocks
was followed by a sharp slump-a telltale sign perhaps of market
manipulation by big operators as large cap stocks peaked. Such are
imperfections of the Indian stockmarket that recently, the BSE Sensex
and NSE Nifty moved in opposite directions on the very same day
because rumours fuelled speculative trading in the shares of one
infotech company, whose floating stock (number of outstanding shares
that are freely available for trading) is notoriously small.
Indeed, there are whispers on the Street that
Ketan Parekh, the main protagonist of last year's scam, may be back
in action, with his favourite stocks like Aftek Infosys and HFCL
beginning to move once again. Remember the K-10 stocks? Well, now
it appears that a number of new favourites may be on the big bull's
favourites' list.
Lack Of Action
With trading volumes depressed-average daily
trading volumes on BSE in September were down by 10 per cent to
Rs 1,160 crore from Rs 1,278.99 crore in May this year-and stock
prices moving within a narrow band, it isn't surprising that even
day traders, who accounted for 90 per cent of total volumes in May-June
this year, are crying off the market. Although day traders (who
buy and sell and square up their trades on a daily basis) are still
around, they account for around 60 per cent of volumes. Points out
Dholakia of Balance Equity: ''Day traders make money in a volatile
market or if they can predict a trend. As of now the market seems
to be directionless leaving them with limited opportunities.''
The market's bearish listlessness is also reflected
in the action of the foreign institutional investors (FIIs). In
September, FIIs were net sellers, with net outflows of Rs 595 crore
($122.3 million). Says Brian Brown, CEO and Head of Equities, Salomon
Smith Barney: ''There is nothing exciting and the attitude of the
FIIs towards India is one of indifference.'' In contrast, FIIs are
bullish on a range of other emerging markets, like Korea, Indonesia,
and Taiwan. In Korea, a long-drawn process of corporate restructuring
has led to FIIs pumping in funds in the last eight months. In India,
it has been just the opposite. In July, Credit Lyonnais Securities
put a 'stop loss' or 'sell' at Sensex 3,100 level. Given the fact
that the Sensex is well below that, a number of FIIs have turned
sellers. The Government of Singapore, a big investor usually bullish
on Indian stocks with large market capitalisation, has also reportedly
turned bearish on India.
Why? After all, Indian companies haven't done
too badly-despite the overall slowdown, a sample of 675 companies
showed a 36 per cent increase in profits in the first quarter of
the current financial year. But stalling of the process of privatisation
and a severe setback to the reforms process that could have been
a catalyst for attracting FII funds have made FIIs bearish. Says
Naganath: ''Emerging markets are getting increasingly localised.
You need to improve the local sentiment and tell your story interestingly.''
Plus there are micro-deterrents. Like the uncertainty over the double
taxation avoidance treaty with Mauritius, where many of the FIIs
active in the Indian market are registered.
Plus, of course, there is the larger US factor.
In the US, in July 2002, individual investors withdrew $52.4 billion
(Rs 2,56,760 crore) from stock funds, the second biggest cash-out
as a percentage of total assets, and the largest ever in sheer dollar
volume. Many market watchers interpret this as evidence that individual
investors have given up on the market and the economy, suggesting
that things will only get worse. Says Ajit Surana, CEO, Dimensional
Securities: ''The weakness in the US economy is also dampening sentiments
in India. The market believes that without the US economy on a sound
footing, we may not see FII inflows.''
Cheap Yet Shunned
Indian stocks are cheap. Yet there are no takers.
Take blue-chip Hindustan Lever. Currently quoted at a three-year
low of around Rs 165, the Lever stock is down from the Rs 266 it
touched on March 1. Like Lever, stocks of as many as 192 companies
are quoting near their 52-week lows and around 1,000 at three-month
lows. And, according to the DSP Merrill Lynch survey, 30 per cent
of fund managers believe that the markets are undervalued.
Yet there's scant interest in picking stocks
up cheap. And while conventional Street wisdom suggests that selling
isn't the best of strategies when valuations are low, analysts don't
rule out a further dropping of valuations.
As for the paradox of lack of demand at cheap
prices, it could be that the general sentiment-based on macro dampeners
like the slowing down of reforms, the postponement of the disinvestment
process and the recent S&P downgrade-have overshadowed the opportunities
that low stock valuations offer.
Some believe that the market is waiting for
a fresh trigger to kick start demand. Like positive announcements
on the reforms process, or perhaps a reversal of trends in global
markets, including the US, or even a cut in personal taxes, as has
been hinted at by the Finance Minister. Good tidings from the corporate
sector may also help. Says Dileep Madgavkar, Chief Information Officer,
Prudential ICICI MF: ''If a few large corporates come out with good
results for q2 in October, especially against the backdrop of overall
gloom, that could be the simplest trigger.''
If triggers like those happen, the markets
will certainly respond. For instance, if the government gets serious
once again about the economic reforms process, you could expect
the markets to bounce back. And if the finance minister, as he has
been hinting, comes up with some measures that boost consumer confidence
and the economy perks up, you could expect the market to stir alive.
But if things like that don't happen, resign yourself to cohabit
with the bear for a while.
|