| 
               
                |  |   
                | Kalyanpur: Now, where did Cyclops go? |  At 
              4.40 pm one Tuesday, St Luke's hospital in Bradford, Masschusetts 
              receives a 37-year-old accident victim. The hospital performs the 
              requisite diagnostics-an X-ray and assorted scans. In the next three 
              minutes, a radiologist in Whitefield, Bangalore receives the scanned 
              images, studies them, and sends in his report. The entire process, 
              from the time the patient was admitted, has taken 20 minutes.   Meet India's only teleradiologist, Dr Arjun 
              Kalyanpur, CEO of Teleradiology Solutions, visiting Assistant Professor 
              of Radiology at Yale, and consultant to 12 American hospitals. ''There 
              is a 25 per cent gap between demand and supply of radiologists in 
              the US,'' says Kalpanpur.  Availability apart, there are other factors 
              that make it for US hospitals to tap Indian radiologists: the cost 
              is over 30 per cent lower in India and the time difference makes 
              it easier for them to look to India. It isn't easy becoming an offshore 
              radiologist: to offer services over the wire radiologists need to 
              be licensed in the US, comply with the American Health Insurance 
              Portability and Accountability Act, and, given the litigious nature 
              of doctor-patient relationships in the US, take (malpractice) insurance 
              cover. These apart, Kalyanpur has a broadband connection, a back-up 
              (after some roadwork downed his connection for 24 hours), and complete 
              power back-up.   Kalyanpur has already been approached by several 
              venture capital firms wishing to get into the 'doctors call centers' 
              business. ''Clinical Process Outsourcing, unlike Business Process 
              Outsourcing is a high-end operation,'' says Kalyanpur. ''It is a 
              distinct possibility bas more doctors of Indian origin come back 
              to India.'' Meanwhile, the lone ranger soldiers on with his X-ray 
              vision. -Venkatesha Babu 
   BEAN COUNTINGActivist Accountants
 The apex body 
              of CAs wakes up from its slumber to crack the whip on some of its 
              members.
 
               
                |  |   
                | ICAI: Policing auditors |  The 
              institute of chartered Accountants of India isn't usually known 
              for speed. That's why the recent suspension of two partners from 
              accounting firm C.C. Choksi, another one from A.F. Ferguson, and 
              a move towards rotation of auditors have surprised the industry. 
              People in the know point out that the institute's alacrity may have 
              something to do with the Naresh Chandra Committee report, which 
              is due in October this year. The committee had been constituted 
              by the government to sort out issues relating to, among other things, 
              the independence of auditors.   Ashok Chandak, President of the Institute, 
              which in recent times has been relegated to conducting ca exams 
              rather than policing auditors, thinks all's well. ''Everything is 
              in place with regards to rules, what is needed is stricter implementation,'' 
              says he. (That may well be a dig at the Department of Company Affairs, 
              with which the institute has been having a quiet row.) ICAI's proposal 
              to rotate auditors isn't winning approvals. Says Kashi N. Memani, 
              Chairman and MD, Ernst & Young India: ''This would increase 
              the risk of audit failure and push up audit cost.'' The issue will 
              come up at ICAI's next meeting. Hope that doesn't put an end to 
              the institute's new-found activist zeal.  -Seema Shukla 
  WHO'S NEXTThe Long Goodbye
 It's still five years away, but everyone wants 
              to know who'll succeed Ratan Tata.
 
               
                |  |   
                | Noel Tata: Will he, won't he? |   
                |  |   
                | K. Dadiseth: Invaluable experience |   
                |  |  
                | Ishaat Hussain: The trouble shooter |  When I turn 65 
              this December, I will step down from my executive function, which 
              is today only in Tata Sons, where I am the executive chairman. But 
              I will remain the non-executive chairman and we will function the 
              way we have over the years.... At the age of 70, I will step down 
              and away from the group, and there will be somebody who will take 
              over as the chairman of Tata Sons...   Ratan Tata, chairman of Tata group, in an interview 
              to BT, March 31, 2002 so, who'll take over the reins of the Rs 41,500 
              crore Tata Group after Ratan Tata? There's Noel Tata, a dark horse 
              12 months ago, but now a contender. He's 45, has the right surname, 
              is the son-in-law of the largest shareholder in Tata Sons, Pallonji 
              Shapoorji Mistry, and is CEO of the group's retail company Trent. 
              And retail competitiveness will play a key role across the group's 
              businesses in the future. However, there is a school of thought 
              that he may have to wait (he is young, goes the argument) a while 
              before taking charge of the group.   In December 2007, then, when Ratan Tata turns 
              70, Tata Sons may decide to appoint another chairman till such time 
              that Noel Tata is ready for the job. One name that has done (and 
              continues to do) the rounds is Keki Dadiseth, the former chairman 
              of HLL and now a Director on the board of parent Unilever. He is 
              already on the board of Tata Group company Indian Hotels, and his 
              experience in working for a MNC at the global level will surely 
              be considered valuable.   The third name in the ring is reportedly that 
              of Ishaat Hussain, one of the three key executives who constitute 
              the Group Executive Office and the group's main trouble shooter 
              in L'affaire Tata Finance. Still, five years is a long time and 
              anything can happen in that period. Watch this space.  -Roshni Jayakar 
 
               
                |  |   
                | Union Industries Minister Murasoli Maran: 
                  Just what do we want? |  BORDERLESS WORLDService Capital To The World
 India has lots to lose, and gain, from the ongoing 
              General Agreement on Trade and Services negotiations. And it has 
              gotten off to a bad start.
 The services sector 
              accounts for 51 per cent of India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 
              and services brought in Rs 63,700 crore in exports in 2001-02. It's 
              a pity then that India doesn't seem to be taking the gats talks 
              in Geneva seriously. The scope of gats is 161 services, everything 
              from education to consulting to healthcare to software. The government 
              maintains it has time till 2005 to put its cards on the table but 
              it is already late. Its request list-areas where it wants greater 
              market access-was due on June 30, 2002. The country could be late 
              with its the offer list-what the country is willing to give in return-too 
              (deadline: March 2003). Analysts say the delay is because the Indian 
              services industry doesn't understand the issues at hand. That can 
              explain the inertia. It doesn't condone it. -Ashish Gupta 
  IDBIDesperately Seeking...
 Can IDBI sell part of its stake in IDBI Bank 
              in time?
 
               
                |  |   
                | IDBI's Vora: Where's the buyer |  As this magazine 
              went to press, less than a week remained to the Reserve Bank of 
              India deadline to IDBI to reduce its stake in IDBI Bank from 58 
              per cent to 49 per cent. On September 21, the board of the financial 
              institution considered a proposal from investment bank JP Morgan. 
              The I-bank bid for 26 per cent of IDBI Bank, but insisted on an 
              exit option with a 15 per cent return on its investment in the event 
              of a merger of IDBI bank and IDBI, and a tag-along clause wherein 
              it would have the right to sell its stake (or part of it) if IDBI 
              did any part of its. IDBI isn't willing to dilute its stake below 
              49 per cent, but is willing to consider the put option. By the time 
              this magazine hits the stands, IDBI would have conveyed its decision 
              to JP Morgan. The financial institution's Chairman P.P. Vora was 
              unavailable for a comment and JP Morgan refused to speak about its 
              bid. Still, if the deal goes through, Morgan will gain by acquiring 
              a piece of a commercial bank. And the money will come in handy for 
              the ailing IDBI.  -Roshni Jayakar |