| 
              
                |  |   
                | Barista outlet: Hope the mocha will taste 
                  the same |  Do-it-yourself 
              is taking on an entirely new meaning at the coffee chain. After 
              having opened 128 company-owned stores in the past three years (that's 
              one store every nine days), the Rs 65-crore Barista is changing 
              tack. Henceforth, its expansion into smaller towns will be driven 
              by franchisees. Some of the towns on its radar: Amritsar, Jalandhar, 
              Allahabad, Indore, Surat, Guwahati, Nagpur, and Cochin.    The first franchisee store 
              opened in Kolkata three months ago, and another one in Delhi is 
              in the offing. But why did it take Barista three years to come around 
              to an established retail practice? ''We invested our equity to establish 
              the concept (of coffee bars) with consumers, and now we have the 
              management resource to de-capitalise the business as we go forward 
              through franchisees,'' says Ravi S. Deol, Barista's Managing Director. 
              For the record, Barista is the first coffee chain to rope in franchisees, 
              who could also be handed some of the company-owned stores. Its two 
              key competitors, Qwiky's and Café Coffee Day, still run self-owned 
              stores.  Also on the anvil is a sharper segmenting of 
              its cafés, based on the kind of coffee and snacks the outlet 
              stocks, with sub-branding of the store's look and feel. That's all 
              fine, but franchising may create some challenge to the Barista model. 
              Currently, all of the chain's frontline staff gets stock options. 
              What happens to the employees of franchisee stores? ''Yes, convincing 
              the franchisees to follow (suit) will be a challenge,'' admits Deol. 
              The making of the first storm in Barista's cup, did you say? -Shailesh Dobhal 
  No 
              Stitch In TimeSARS and war cripple garment exports.
 Sharad 
              Mathur, partner in the Mumbai-based Essential Clothing Company, 
              a Rs 9-crore garment export company, has just cancelled his participation 
              in the Hong Kong Trade Fair to be held in July this year. Reason: 
              The US-Iraq war followed by the SARS epidemic and the general slowdown 
              in the world economy. As Mathur puts it: ''Even if I do participate, 
              important customers from Australia, the US and Europe will not be 
              there because of the SARS fear.'' The general impression, most exporters 
              point out, is that the ''buying sentiment'' is not just there now. 
                According to Virender Uppal, Chairman of the 
              Apparel Export Council of India, total export orders worth Rs 200-300 
              crore have either been cancelled or delayed. Compounding the problem 
              is the fact that most foreign buyers have put on hold travel plans 
              to India. That means vendors will have to wait for a few more months 
              before business picks up.   However, amidst all this gloom and doom, exporters 
              are seeing a glimmer of hope. If China continues to suffer due to 
              sars, a lot of its orders could well come India's way (China is 
              the country's biggest competitor in garments). Again, with the Office 
              for Iraqi Programme (OIP) slowly clearing goods stuck at Iraqi ports, 
              garment exporters are heaving a sigh of relief. According to a senior 
              Commerce Ministry official, as many as 22 contracts worth more than 
              Rs 500 crore have already been cleared, and the rest will be cleared 
              shortly. Now, all eyes are on SARS. -Ashish Gupta 
  Three 
              Heads On Globalisation Three London 
              Business School gurus, Saul Estrin, an expert on deregulation 
              and privatisation; George Yip, a strategy maven; and 
              P. Christopher Earley, a specialist in organisational 
              behaviour were in Mumbai recently to speak on what it takes to succeed 
              in a global economy. BT's Roshni Jayakar 
              caught up with all three for some valuable sound bytes. 
              Excerpts.   Saul 
              Estrin: "Acquisitions key to FDI inflow"  You have completed a survey on FDI inflows 
              into India. What do you think are the barriers to FDI?  The barriers include institutional weaknesses, 
              cost of labour, and barriers to (accessing) the domestic market. 
              The Indian market is complicated. It is expensive for foreign firms 
              to come in and get a grip of the country as a whole. The solution 
              to that would be acquisitions. In practice, even they are proving 
              difficult.   Has India lost the FDI race to China?  What is the race for? If you think you need 
              FDI to create more jobs, then India doesn't need it (FDI). But 15 
              years ago, China required FDI to do just that. In a country like 
              India, the real benefit of FDI is the spillover of technology and 
              the pressure to be globally competitive. That's where India is perhaps 
              losing out.  
   George 
              Yip: ''A global company has capability to go anywhere"  What is a global company? A global company does not have to be everywhere. 
              But it has the capability to go anywhere, deploy any assets, and 
              access any resources. And it maximises profits on a global basis.  How should Indian companies go global? They should start off with an Asia or regional 
              strategy before going global. Or they can gain global leadership 
              by exploiting low cost locations, moving into key markets preemptively, 
              and internationalising human resources.   How can we catch up with the rest of the 
              world?  First, become aware of the company's global 
              potential. Second, leverage a huge domestic market to go global. 
              Finally, expand into markets similar to the home base, using competencies 
              developed there. 
   P. 
              Christopher Earley: "Cultural intelligence is critical"  How is it that some managers work effectively 
              across cultures while others don't?  The answer is a global mindset. This is what 
              we call Cultural Intelligence or CQ. This is an individual's ability 
              to adapt and manage successfully across new cultures. It reflects 
              a capability to gather and manipulate information, draw inferences, 
              and engage in effective actions in a new cultural setting.   Cultural misunderstandings lie at the root 
              of failed business relationships. How can a company that needs to 
              work through multinational teams avoid this?   You need to build teams that are either homogenous 
              or heterogenous. Homogenous teams are good if you need to complete 
              a task quickly. If you have several months, then heterogenous teams 
              are better. The very process of searching for a commonality creates 
              a bond between members. |