|
L&T's Naik: Not one to rest on laurels,
the CMD is focussing on cutting costs and improving margins
in the construction group within a two-year time frame |
The façade
of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) house, a stately brownstone mansion
in Ballard Estate, Mumbai's colonial era business district, conforms
to the architectural style of its neighbours-they were all designed
by the same architect (one George Wittet) in the European Renaissance
style to ensure uniformity. It's more than just passing trivia
to note that most of the other corporate headquarters in the district
remain family-run businesses to this day. But more on that later...
Inside the building, the dimensions of the
hallways (and the foghorns of ships anchored in the neighbouring
docks) are like a step back in time. One barely has time to soak
in the sight of polished teakwood and cane boardroom chairs when
A.M. Naik, 63, Chairman and Managing Director of l&t, strides
in, shattering the genteel, old world ambience with his here and
now aggression.
This reporter has to field a volley of questions
on the hows, whats, wheres and whys of the Business Today Best
Managed Companies survey, before attempting a few of her own.
Naik is an old l&t hand who's been there, done that, and most
importantly, believes in straddling the here and now as well.
Having joined the company as a junior engineer some 40 years ago,
he has risen through the ranks.
Seamlessly rolling l&t's past, its future
strategies and the odds that the management has had to battle
over the years into one comprehensive low-down on the company,
Naik spells out clearly where l&t is coming from and where
it is headed. "You are probably too young to even conceive
of what the license era was like. Who got what licenses and how
policies were framed all depended on the maliks of Indian businesses;
we were just professionals with next to no clout. I remember we
wanted to make boilers, turbines, offshore platforms and earth
moving machinery... every licence application was rejected under
public sector opposition. It makes me unhappy when I think where
l&t could have been if...," he reflects.
That pretty much sums up how l&t is genetically
different from its neighbours in Ballard Estate, almost all of
whom are controlled by business families. But why the fuss about
licences today? Simple! The company lost the opportunity to gain
expertise and scale up operations in crucial business segments.
|
Leadership @L&T: (Front row L to
R) M.V. Kotwal, Sr. VP (Heavy Engineering); Y.M. Deosthalee,
Director & CFO; A.M. Naik, CMD; K.V. Rangaswami, Sr. VP
(Construction); and J.P. Nayak, Director & President (Operations).
Back row (L to R) K. Venkataramanan, Director & President
(Operations); V.K. Magapu, Director & Sr. VP (IT &
Technology Services); and R.N. Mukhija, Director & Sr.
VP (Operations) |
When Naik took over as Chairman in 1999, he
had his task cut out-l&t was a lumbering giant with no less
than 65-odd businesses across 12 verticals. It was growing steadily
and had an excellent dividend record, but its share price had
remained range-bound at Rs 170-180 levels for almost a decade.
"Yes, we 'Made The Things That Made India Proud' and were
the 'Builders to the Nation' and all that, but our share price
didn't reflect this. Much of our growth had come in the earlier
protected environment, but we had to learn to survive in a competitive
environment-where someone is butchering someone else all the time,"
says Naik.
The management set about the task of changing
the l&t mindset, particularly on the issue of shareholder
value. This led to the company's first Vision Statement in 1999
(see Best Practice). "Everyone was required to look at value
creation. It could be operational excellence, better use of working
capital or even looking at new geographies-the efficacy of any
new idea was (and is) measured using the return on capital employed
(roce) and debt-equity parameters. Over the last three years,
the roce has gone up markedly and debt is down from 1.07 times
equity to 0.3 times equity in the same period," says Y.M.
Deosthalee, cfo, l&t.
But how much of these financial gains are
related to the demerger of l&t's Rs 2,600-crore cement division?
"It didn't have much effect on the debt-equity ratio since
cement was never a huge user of working capital. We were down
to 74 per cent (debt-equity) even before the demerger," explains
Deosthalee.
The company is not resting on its laurels.
"Effective costs need to be brought down to a level where
they are half a percentage point lower than the competition's.
To do this, we are looking at costs across materials, overheads
and labour," says Naik, adding: "This year, we have
launched a two-year programme to bring down costs and improve
the margin in the construction group from 6-6.5 per cent to 8
per cent. The goal is clear: I don't want only growth; I want
profitable growth; I want return on capital."
KEY DIFFERENTIATOR |
The
vision is clear: emerge as an Indian multinational with
a core focus on technology-led manufacturing, engineering
and construction, and it and engineering services. And giving
this vision a leg up, ironically, is the law of unintended
consequences. The A.V. Birla Group raid on, and the subsequent
demerger of, l&t's cement division was the first step
towards a greater focus on its core competence (see main
story for details). "In one shot we achieved multiple
goals. The share price rose and we brought down our debt
equity ratio over the last three years. Moreover our Economic
Value Added, which was (-) Rs 400 crore two years before
the demerger is Rs 50 crore now," gloats A.M. Naik,
Chairman & md of l&t. The markets have rewarded
this performance; l&t share prices have risen to about
Rs 1,100 against Rs 160 when the Birlas launched their takeover
bid and the debt equity ratio is down from 1.07:1 to 0.3:1.
|
L&T has also launched an extensive business
rationalisation process that will kick off with the unveiling
of the company's next strategic plan next month. This will involve
the sale of businesses in the Rs 50-100-crore range and the acquisition
of others that complement its core competence. About 65 businesses
will come under the microscope. "It will be a continuous
portfolio review. You will hear something on this rationalisation
every second or third month," says Naik.
The company's largest business is the Engineering
& Construction (e&c) Division, which comprises construction,
e&c projects and heavy engineering and contributes 83 per
cent to l&t's Rs 11,000-crore turnover. The Electrical &
Electronics (e&e) Division accounts for 10 per cent of sales.
Others (including infotech) make up the remaining 7 per cent.
"Currently, the mix at the e&c Division-which includes
both manufacturing and projects-is skewed in favour of the latter.
We plan to plan to rejig this portfolio to get a more even balance;
in the next four-five years we are looking to earn a greater proportion
of our revenues from it, e-engineering and embedded software services,"
says Deosthalee.
There are sound business and financial reasons
for this. Turnkey projects, typically, introduce an element of
volatility into earnings, given that they involve time and cost
management by the company. This, coupled with global competition,
means that maintaining margins-rather than the more desirable
growth of margins-can itself become a challenge. Thus, the growing
emphasis on services! Deosthalee expects this initiative to "increase
margins by 1-1.5 per cent across the company" in the next
four-five years.
The bigger picture is also very much in place.
"By the end of this period (four-five years), 60 per cent
of sales should come from turnkey projects and construction compared
to 70 per cent now, 25 per cent should come from manufacturing-which
includes the e&e Division-up from 16-17 per cent now, and
the balance from it, engineering and embedded software against
their current contribution of 4-5 per cent," he informs.
BEST PRACTICE |
|
Global foray: Acrylonitrile
reactors made by L&T are headed for a plant in China |
Larsen
& Toubro went on a value creation drive in 1999. A massive
interactive process involving 7,500 people generated the
company's first vision statement. Value creation was at
the core of the philosophy and was defined differently for
different constituents of the "value tree"-and
ranged from operational excellence, to better use of working
capital or even tapping new geographies. "We involved
people down to the supervisor level in this process so they
understood exactly how they could make a difference,"
says Y.M. Deosthalee, cfo, l&t. The results are already
visible: Strict monitoring of working capital has resulted
in a doubling of the asset-turnover ratio in the last four-five
years. l&t has been climbing steadily up the value chain-from
fabrication and construction projects to engineering and
project management. It is now gunning for a presence in
technology-intensive projects to differentiate itself from
scores of smaller players that take up construction and
fabrication jobs. "We focus on quality growth and outsource
jobs that don't require major engineering talent to smaller
companies," says K. Venkataramanan, President (Operations),
l&t. The company has also adopted a crucial de-risking
strategy through geographical diversification. "Our
revenues had remained stagnant between 1998 and 2001. The
overall investment level in the country was low and we had
to compete with international majors in the domestic market;
so we embarked on a strategy to create a global footprint,
thus insulating ourselves against the vagaries of the Indian
market," says Deosthalee.
L&T is making an aggressive foray into the international
markets, particularly in the manufacturing space. Its heavy
engineering division's order book has grown 55 per cent
in the last year alone and its Hazira Works was recognised
as a "Most Valuable Supplier" by Fluor Daniel,
a major US-based EPC contractor.
|
The company is also climbing up the value
chain within the e&c business. Explains K. Venkataramanan,
President (Operations), l&t: "There is an increasing
degree of complexity (in skill sets) as you move up from construction
and fabrication into engineering, project management and technology-based
projects. And as India enters a massive growth phase, we are moving
away from the construction and fabrication orbit into engineering
and project management."
His answer should pacify investors who are
growing concerned over margins. "The company needs to differentiate
itself from others. In construction, there are at least 15-20
smaller players who can execute the large projects l&t does,"
says an analyst with a domestic brokerage firm.
In the last five years, it has aggressively
moved into the West Asian construction and turnkey project market.
"The strategy has been to treat West Asia as an extension
of India. In construction and turnkey projects, we have a presence
in seven West Asian nations, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka,"
says Naik, adding that he expects to have an l&t House in
Abu Dhabi within the next two years. In addition, the company
has bagged heavy engineering orders worth Rs 275 crore from the
us in the last 10 months alone. China is another focus market.
l&t will open an office in Beijing this May. "We have
already sold high tech equipment worth Rs 700 crore in China and
I am targeting Rs 500 crore sales there this year," says
Naik. This global foray is beginning to pay off: Five years ago,
international sales contributed next to nothing to the company's
turnover; they now account for about 17 per cent of revenues.
The goal is to step this up to 25 per cent by 2009-10.
Overseas turnkey and construction projects
could mean lower margins for the time being, but "they will
improve as we establish more beachheads", assures Venkata-ramanan.
He adds, "The important thing is to guard our turf in India.
Global companies are entering India and China. There will be qualitative
changes in requirements as massive infrastructure projects are
launched. We have begun to prepare for that scale. Even now, we
are the only Indian company operating in several of the niches
we occupy; the others are all multinationals. In that sense, you
could call us the 'national champions'."
National champion it may be, but it still
faces some major risks and challenges. Key among them will be
the ability to attract the best talent and manage the attrition
of top performers. Also, the sizes of most of its businesses are
still quite small by world standards. This raises questions about
their global competitiveness.
How it addresses these issues will decide
if the "national champion" can go on to become a world
beater. For now, investors can rest assured that its domestic
turf is reasonably well protected.
|