  | 
                 
                 
                  | Tomorrow's stars? Kids practise at the 
                    DLTA courts in New Delhi | 
                 
               
              $10 billion. Rs 43,000 
                crore at the then exchange rate. That was the value Fortune magazine 
                put on hoop-meister Michael Jordan's contribution to the us economy. 
                It also put him on the cover of the magazine. That was way back 
                in 1998. Sure, the calculation included sales of clothing and 
                footwear lines that were either named after or endorsed by the 
                man, but $10 billion is a lot of money (and 12,192, the number 
                of baskets Jordan has scored in his lifetime in the NBA, is a 
                lot of baskets).  
               The number is significant because it is about 
                the same value this magazine puts on the size of the sports market 
                (leaving out sales of products endorsed by sportspeople, but including 
                pretty much everything else) in India by 2010. That's five years 
                from now, and if the number still looks like an exercise in inspired 
                extrapolation (it isn't and is actually based on sound math and 
                plain common sense) blame it on the Indian psyche. For instance, 
                were the estimate to be about the size of the offshored Indian 
                it services industry and were this magazine to say $80 billion 
                (Rs 3,52,000 crore) by 2010 (the actual number, according to India's 
                software lobby nasscom will be $48 billion or Rs 2,11,200 crore) 
                no one would have any problems accepting the number. That's because 
                India is an it nation. Not a sporting one.  
              
              It's one thing to look at the size of a nation's 
                population and economy and derive the ideal 'sporting-quotient' 
                for it, something similar to what audit firm PricewaterhouseCoopers 
                did before the Athens Olympics (the study showed that India should 
                win 10 medals; see A Sporting Nation...). It is another to realise 
                that the way Indians look at sports is changing, something that 
                could eventually result in an Indian winning Wimbledon or earning 
                a podium-finish in f1, and something that will definitely mean 
                that the sports economy grows beyond this magazine's Rs 40,000 
                crore projection by 2010. "In our current culture of consumerism 
                and self-assuredness, sports are kind of becoming a make-me-feel-good-about-myself 
                thing," says Santosh Desai, President, McCann Erickson. Sports 
                is still far from being a way of life in India, unlike in Australia, 
                where an average household spends upwards of 10 per cent of its 
                monthly household budget on the pursuit of sports, perhaps every 
                kind known to man and more. But what is important is that the 
                very idea of sports in India is morphing from mere entertainment 
                (huge television audiences) and enchantment (the culture of the 
                sports celebrity) to also become an attractive activity and indulgence, 
                if not a serious career option as yet, for the affluent middle 
                class in India, a good 40 million households across the country. 
                "Indians are realising the importance of giving their kids 
                a well-rounded and healthy upbringing and, therefore, you see 
                lots more kids on tennis courts and more men on golf courses now," 
                says Ravi Krishnan, CEO of sports marketing company IMG India. 
                With obesity amongst middle class Indian kids taking epidemic 
                proportions, smart parents are pushing their kids towards outdoor 
                sports as means to expend those extra calories. 
              
                 
                   THE RS 40,000-CRORE OPPORTUNITY 
                     By 2010, that's how big the Indian 
                    sports economy could be. | 
                 
                 
                  |  COACHING: Today, 
                    around 10 million Indians spend an average of Rs 2,000 a month 
                    on tennis, cricket, swimming, squash, or basketball classes 
                    for their children. That's Rs 24,000 crore a year. Even conservatively, 
                    that number would grow to Rs 30,000 crore by 2010 
                      BROADCASTING: Today, sports 
                      broadcasting is a Rs 600-700 crore industry; by 2010, even 
                      if nothing changes, it would be a Rs 1,500-2,000 crore one. 
                      However, pay-per-view, broadband and non-television broadcasting 
                      could change everything and the industry could well be worth 
                      Rs 5,000 crore by 2010 
                     ENDORSEMENTS: A mere Rs 
                      150-200 crore worth today, things will change once India 
                      is represented in the top 10 in the really rich sports, 
                      tennis, say, or golf. Maria Sharapova, for instance, makes 
                      around $20 million (Rs 88 crore) from endorsements. By 2010, 
                      then, this slice of the pie could be worth at least Rs 1,000 
                      crore in India 
                     TICKET SALES: Across sports, 
                      this is an insignificant statistic in India right now. The 
                      English Cricket Board made £5 million (Rs 39.5 crore) 
                      from the sale of tickets for the recently concluded Ashes 
                      2005 test series. If any professional league, either in 
                      football, or hockey, even cricket takes off in India in 
                      the next few years, it would contribute significantly to 
                      revenues from ticket sales  
                     TITLE SPONSORSHIPS: Linked 
                      to the success of a professional league in any sport, this 
                      too, could contribute significantly to revenues 
                   | 
                 
                 
                  | Source: All figures are BT estimates with 
                    inputs from industry players | 
                 
                 
                   Do Economically Developed 
                    Countries Do Better? 
                    It would seem so; should India be happy? 
                     | 
                 
                
                  |  Though sporting 
                    success has a kind of correlation to a country's population 
                    and more so, to economic wealth, the correlation is far from 
                    simple or straight. For it is in fact developed countries, 
                    and those belonging to the former Soviet block and China, 
                    that tend to punch above their weight at most big international 
                    sporting events such as the Olympics. "Sport it seems 
                    is one area where a planned economy can succeed," says 
                    a PricewaterhouseCoopers report (published: 2004), titled 
                    Modelling Olympic Performance. And other unquantifiable invariables, 
                    like relative levels of state and corporate funding, hungriness 
                    for success, attitude and genes play a crucial role. So what 
                    explains India's dismal performance relative to its economy, 
                    for according to the same PwC report, it should have come 
                    home from Athens with 10 medals, not just Rajyavardhan Rathore's 
                    sole silver? "As people, we're not competitive. And till 
                    now the incentives for doing well in sports were minimal," 
                    says sociologist Ashish Nandy. | 
                 
               
              On A Cusp, And Prayer 
                 
              
                 
                    | 
                 
                 
                  | Rahul Dravid: #2 today | 
                 
               
              "The very idea of earning a living through 
                sports is alien to us, but it's changing," says sociologist 
                Ashish Nandy. That's because, as a nation and people we are close 
                to an inflection point where we are becoming less paranoid with 
                our concern for the future, partly because a whole new generation 
                has grown up working in a post liberalised economy. Today, these 
                individuals are in the 30-45 age group (that would mean they were 
                15-30 years old when India decided to throw open its economy). 
                They have benefited from an explosion in livelihood choices and 
                salaries. They have learned to celebrate consumerism, not denial. 
                And (thanks to TV) they have watched young Indians falteringly 
                make their way to the top echelons of their chosen sport. "And 
                that's when the only-good-education-brings-success-in-life thing 
                gets to loosen and the feel for nurturing natural talent (in sports, 
                for instance) rises up the ladder," says McCann's Desai. 
              
                 
                  |  A Career Choice | 
                 
                 
                   
                    
                      
                          | 
                       
                       
                        | Nike Bhupathi Tennis Village's C.K.G. 
                          Bhupathi: 14 it is | 
                       
                     
                    When do you take the call 
                      to pursue a game you are good at as a career option? According 
                      to C.G.K. Bhupathi, who runs the Nike Bhupathi Tennis Village 
                      on the outskirts of Bangalore (he is the father of Mahesh 
                      Bhupathi, probably the best tennis-doubles player India 
                      has ever produced), the magic age is 14. "From the 
                      age of seven to 14, they train really hard and essentially 
                      pull a double shift almost every day," he says, looking 
                      at a batch of students, "combining the rigours on the 
                      court with their academic requirements." With sports 
                      just beginning to emerge as a viable career option, however, 
                      it still doesn't make sense to focus exclusively on sport 
                      (unless you are very very good or very very rich or, ideally, 
                      both). That's because of the limited opportunities that 
                      exist, says Anirban Blah of Globosport, a sports management 
                      firm promoted by Mahesh Bhupathi. He points to the case 
                      of Shikha Uberoi, ranked 125 in the world and seen as another 
                      rising star, who "continues to struggle in terms of 
                      sponsorship".  
                    -Rahul Sachitanand 
                   | 
                 
               
              Not entirely, though. For, although aspirations 
                and the amount of money people are willing to spend on sports 
                (typically on lessons for their wards) have soared, infrastructure, 
                both physical and marketing, haven't kept pace (see The Business 
                Of Sport). If there are any heroes in this story, it has to be 
                the parents who perform a variety of roles ranging from sponsor 
                and cheerleader through ball boy and chauffeur to coach and when 
                the chips are down, motivational speaker. "My parents have 
                sacrificed a lot for my sake, right from the time in school when 
                they had to cart me around for practice to my dad helping with 
                my finances," says Joshna Chinappa, the world's #2 squash 
                player in the junior league. And when Aaron D'souza, now all of 
                13, showed promise in swimming, his father, Agnel D'souza, packed 
                up everything and moved the family from Mumbai's Thane district 
                (where full-size pools are non-existent) to Bangalore and the 
                expert coaching at Basavangudi Aquatic Centre, a place that shot 
                into limelight when the world discovered that the Millet sisters, 
                Nisha and Reshma, the brightest stars on India's swimming horizon 
                for some time, had trained there. "We did well in it because 
                Indian parents were willing to sacrifice everything to see their 
                kids succeed in engineering. We are now beginning to see some 
                kind of societal momentum building up for sports," says Anil 
                Khanna, Secretary General of All India Tennis Association (AITA). 
                "I have been in the tennis coaching business for over 17 
                years now, but the change in parents' and kids' attitude has been 
                phenomenal over the past one-two years. Now they're coming in 
                droves. The business for people like me is booming," adds 
                Shekhar Menon, who runs Shanti Tennis Academy in New Delhi. AITA 
                has set itself a target of producing 100,000 certified tennis 
                coaches in the next four-five years, up from under 10,000 currently. 
                It has also woken up to the fact that hundreds of tennis academies 
                are mushrooming across the country and is in the process of commissioning 
                a count to facilitate regulation and promotion.  
              
                 
                   Cricket Nation 
                    Blinkers or not, our obsession for cricket 
                    is enduring. | 
                 
                 
                  |  
                    
                     It's a simple case of a good 
                      product and great marketing. "Cricket perhaps is the 
                      single largest cultural product consumed in this country," 
                      says Santosh Desai, President, McCann Erickson. It is also 
                      the single largest builder of our national identity, perhaps 
                      even above our (mutual) animosity with Pakistan.  
                     Little wonder, then sports television rides on Indian 
                      cricket, with over 80 per cent of the total Rs 450 crore 
                      sports advertising spend (2004) going to cricket; in viewership 
                      terms, cricket accounts for 70 per cent of all sports eyeballs. 
                      And cricketers are only celebrities who walk shoulder to 
                      shoulder with film stars, both on popularity and earnings. 
                      "For any sport to become a success, you need icons 
                      whom media can hype," says L.V. Krishnan, Head of television 
                      monitoring agency, TAM. For all the glamour associated with 
                      tennis, and Sania Mirza notwithstanding, can anyone still 
                      think of making a Hindi blockbuster based on any other sport, 
                      but cricket, as Aamir Khan did with Lagaan (left)? This 
                      is something that non-cricket sport federations need to 
                      understand as they set out to promote their disciplines, 
                      something that the Board of Control for Cricket in India 
                      (BCCI) realised a long time ago. 
                     Yet, it is only at the international level that cricket 
                      has any appeal, for players, broadcasters, advertisers and 
                      the like. "BCCI is the richest cricket body in the 
                      world. It can easily support 50-60 academies to tap talent 
                      in small towns and villages," says Navjot Singh Siddhu. 
                      That it can.  
                     -Shailesh Dobhal and Kumarkaushalam 
                     | 
                 
               
              Cause And Effect 
               Everything has a role to play. Broadcasters 
                and marketers will rush to cover and sponsor events where Indian 
                sportspeople do well, and, in turn, this coverage and interest 
                will spur others to take up the sport. Sports broadcasters, such 
                as ESPN star Sports and Zee Sports, are picking up and repackaging-for-TV 
                sports such as hockey (Premier Hockey League; see The PHL Experiment) 
                and football that were once considered too insignificant to cover 
                in the Indian context. And Sania Mirza's fourth round appearance 
                against Maria Sharapova at the us Open, says former world billiards 
                champion Geet Sethi, will "be a big subconscious booster 
                for a whole generation of Indian tennis players, especially women". 
                  
              
                 
                   Children Of a lesser God? 
                     Not really, but it isn't quite 
                    cricket. | 
                 
                 
                   
                    
                       
                          | 
                          | 
                          | 
                       
                       
                        | The new ambassadors: Fast, 
                          driven, and on target, but will marketers bite? | 
                       
                     
                    Cricket 
                      still comes in first, but there seems to be a fatigue setting 
                      in for cricketers, and therefore openness for other sports," 
                      says Latika Khaneja, Director of Collage Sports Management, 
                      on changing corporate attitudes towards sponsoring other 
                      sports. It helps that non-cricket sportspersons, Sania Mirza 
                      (tennis), Arjun Atwal (golf) and Rajyavardhan Rathore (shooting), 
                      are winning international tournaments. Khaneja has already 
                      roped in Sahara and Hero Honda for Rathore, at Rs 75 lakh 
                      a pop, significant numbers even by cricketing standards. 
                      That it isn't always a case of happily-ever-after is evident 
                      from the case of long-jumper Anju Bobby George who is, as 
                      this magazine goes to press, in India, trying to raise some 
                      of the Rs 55-60 lakh she needs to continue to compete in 
                      the international circuit. "Indian companies looking 
                      at going global should sponsor (Indian) golfers in the USPGA," 
                      says Ravi Krishnan, Managing Director, IMG and TWI for India 
                      and South Asia. That's a thought. After all, if Accenture 
                      can get Tiger Woods for its campaign, why can't Infosys, 
                      TCS, or Wipro sponsor an Atwal or a (Jyoti) Randhawa? 
                     -Amanpreet Singh 
                   | 
                 
               
              Read in the larger societal context, the question 
                of the business popularity of cricket versus other sports, in 
                terms of broadcast or endorsement money, is actually irrelevant. 
                "In sports, success and popularity loop into each other," 
                says B. Narayanswamy, Director of Indica Research. In cricket 
                it was India's victory in the Prudential World Cup 1983, and the 
                presence of icons such as Sunil Gavaskar, Kapil Dev and Sachin 
                Tendulkar that made the sport an Indian obsession. Such icons 
                are emerging in other sports now, and, surprise surprise, some 
                of them are actually going out and winning events.  
              
                 
                    | 
                 
                 
                  | Maria Sharapova: Her 2004-Wimbledon 
                    win set off the rush | 
                 
               
              "Sania's success, though ephemeral, will 
                certainly prop up tennis as popular culture," says sports 
                writer and sociologist Ramchandra Guha. Last year, according to 
                media monitoring agency tam, the average viewership of a Formula 
                1 race was 0.1; this year, with India's Narain Karthikeyan in 
                the fray, the number has increased to 0.3, a jump of 7 lakh households. 
                "Globally, celebrity and celebration have become the core 
                value of sports," says McCann's Desai. With celebrities arriving, 
                though belatedly, marketing across sports federations and broadcasters 
                getting slicker, and consumer mindsets and purse strings loosening, 
                the party for sports for India has just begun. 
               -additional reporting by 
                Rahul Sachitanand 
             |